Of course they asked her that during the hearing, because it's important to get it on record. They, however, did not discredit and dismiss her long before that hearing, when she first spoke out, on the basis that she hadn't filed a police report or come out earlier, both of which they have done to Reade.I mean, they literally did both of those things, in a public hearing, under oath. But hey ho, please continue.
Who is this idiot? Someone with clout or someone like you?
Who is this idiot? Someone with clout or someone like you?
Any car crash fans here?
Your use of commas deserves lashing.listen guy,,,,,
To own the libsI'm going to kill myself
Not just are you voting for Biden so that "nothing will fundamentally change", you are voting for the next generation of Bidens to fundamentally change nothing
At least he's personally responded now. Where it goes from here, who knows. https://apnews.com/de6b2131cb75e1e61b5d35d15f9f957e
Friday's statement is the first detailed response from Biden to Reade's allegation.
"While the details of these allegations of sexual harassment and sexual assault are complicated, two things are not complicated. One is that women deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and when they step forward they should be heard, not silenced. The second is that their stories should be subject to appropriate inquiry and scrutiny," the former vice president and presumptive Democratic 2020 nominee said in the statement.
He continued, "Responsible news organizations should examine and evaluate the full and growing record of inconsistencies in her story, which has changed repeatedly in both small and big ways."
"But this much bears emphasizing," he said. "She has said she raised some of these issues with her supervisor and senior staffers from my office at the time. They -- both men and a woman -- have said, unequivocally, that she never came to them and complained or raised issues. News organizations that have talked with literally dozens of former staffers have not found one -- not one -- who corroborated her allegations in any way. Indeed, many of them spoke to the culture of an office that would not have tolerated harassment in any way -- as indeed I would not have
I agree. Of course if evidence now comes to light that contradicts him, he's done. He's not like Trump - the standard is and should be that if you lie about this you're disqualified. But at least it's not all shadow-y anymore.Biden has handled this quite well. Didn't call Reade a liar or attack her, instead called for an open investigation against any ethics charge filed against him during his entire career in the senate.
Not just are you voting for Biden so that "nothing will fundamentally change", you are voting for the next generation of Bidens to fundamentally change nothing
borg-like has a lot potential for the biden camp
perfectThe Bidenborgs
thread
Seems like that'll be the next stepThey have to open up the UDel files. As Mika said on MJ, simply get an independent commission set up and do it. Limit it to Reade.
I think it's unlikely he picks a 70 year old with whom he has had numerous run-ins as his VP regardless of what doners might of might not think.
the democrats have shown an eagerness to vote for a lot worse than fraud in recent daysHow didnt that end him...
Just good researchHow didnt that end him...
Not necessarily. Parties change over the course of time. Lincoln was a Republican president, now you see Republican protestors with confederate flags. Obviously, I took a very extreme example, but parties change over time. I don't think it is ridiculous to suspect that GOP will go a bit towards the left in the next few years, if the American average voter goes a bit towards the left (which might happen, with oldies dying and young people in average being more leftish at least cultural wise).Bless your innocent soul.