Trump, Graham, and Gingrich have said that they hope it is Bernie.
I don't get where does this idea that Bernie is the best candidate to defeat Trump. If he cannot win in a party that represents center and center-left, how is he gonna win over the entire population? He inspires turnout proved to be totally wrong, with the states that increased turnout going heavily in favor of Biden.
Bernie is easily the most popular in internet forums, but when it comes to the people who vote, he isn't standing that well. Even with massive financial advantage, he just got destroyed on Super Tuesday.
What @Siorac said.
And Trump ran and won a number of votes on "anti-establishment" and taking advantage of the distrust towards politicians and corporations. By coincident how Clinton was and is perceived by a number of voters. Biden is similar. The polls predicted that Bernie would win over Trump in 2016, Hillary was not a safe bet. Same indications now.
If the goal is to beat Trump, then Bernie is still the best bet.
If the voters want better healthcare over time. Bernie is the best candidate.
If the voters want a living wage without having to work 2 jobs, Bernie is the best candidate.
If the voters care about the climate or the environment, Bernie is the best bet.
Biden is status quo in regards to a system that have made the US citizens (not the rich) gradually into peasants striving to stay alive, not dissimilar to how the feudal system f*cked the serfs for several hundred years.
This. If Sanders wins the primaries then I want Sanders running. If Biden wins the primaries I want Biden running. Because of fairness and democracy? Not so much, but because the primaries are the best test (better than polls) of what is needed to win the general election: turning out people to vote for you.If that were true then Bernie would also be beating Biden right now, which clearly isn't happening. Nor is Bernie's core argument that he can build a mass movement that will "activate" the 65m people who currently don't vote, materializing. He has also somehow managed to not build on what he accomplished in 2016 by expanding his voter base to appeal to black voters in the Democratic party (no Dem in modern history has won the Presidency without strong support from the black community). So collectively, and despite the appeal of his policy positions, these factors don't paint a collectively flattering picture of his chances against Trump.
If that were true then Bernie would also be beating Biden right now, which clearly isn't happening. Nor is Bernie's core argument that he can build a mass movement that will "activate" the 65m people who currently don't vote, materializing. He has also somehow managed to not build on what he accomplished in 2016 by expanding his voter base to appeal to black voters in the Democratic party (no Dem in modern history has won the Presidency without strong support from the black community). So collectively, and despite the appeal of his policy positions, these factors don't paint a collectively flattering picture of his chances against Trump.
Seems the originator of the tweet decided to double down:
There is a difference between being the prefered alternative to Trump and beating Biden. Two different scenarios. What you want is to take the most amount of voters that are not blindly voting for each party. They will vote for the DNC or GOP candidate regardless.
Biden wins a clear majority of the older afro-american voters, while Sanders wins among the younger black voters (not 100% sure). The reason as for why Biden wins a majority of the total of black voters can be explained by the reason that the % of younger afro-American people that vote are significantly less than in the older generation(s).
Swing voters, independents, people that voted for Trump purely based on their distrust in the DNC or dislike of Hillary (It was a reason the GOP and Trump ran on these stories) are what will make the difference against Trump. And polls, especially in 2016 showed that Sanders would be the prefered alternative among these groups.
Still no endorsement from Warren for Bernie? what is she waiting for.
Any chance she will be the VP pick?
I really think no endorsement before Tuesday is the favourite. Unless Bernie really is willing to make her his running mate. I think she'd bite his hand off for that.Warren will end up endorsing Biden in the next 48 hours. No doubt she will use the excuse that some anonymous Bernie supporters have been nasty to her online and that she is endorsing Biden to help bring the country together.
Also white males under 35 who voted for a guy who proclaimed climate change as a Chinese hoax so how about look at your own people first.
The white men were the worst category. Likely old white men.The real issue is white women. Like they did in 2016 they will hand trump a second term without blinking an eye.
The white men were the worst category. Likely old white men.
Its so obvious that Biden is not up for this and its just pathetic that his campaign has had him hidden away from the campaign trail. Since Super Tuesday, i don't think he has done any rallies, events or public engagements.
Even the private fundraisers that have taken place in the past few days, he has sent his wife to go to those events on his behalf.
51% of white women voted for Trump in 2016. More than any other demographic.
White men 62% Trump!51% of white women voted for Trump in 2016. More than any other demographic.
Except for white men, you mean?
White men 62% Trump!
Edit, in fairness white women gave birth to the white men so still to blame.
Do you have some numbers?I mean we really are scraping the bottom of the barrel here. the white men % doesn't swing an election the way women % of voters do. So it is a useless argument to make that white man voted for trump. Like duh of course they did. But it is the % of turn out amongst white women for trump which is largest amongst any other demographic that helped him secure the win.
I mean we really are scraping the bottom of the barrel here. the white men % doesn't swing an election the way women % of voters do. So it is a useless argument to make that white man voted for trump. Like duh of course they did. But it is the % of turn out amongst white women for trump which is largest amongst any other demographic that helped him secure the win.
This really doesn't make any sense to me. Either it's worth talking about both white women and white men as voting demographics, or it's not worth talking about either of them. Besides, if the 2012 Exit Poll numbers aren't completely wrong, then white women actually voted significantly more Democratic in 2016 than 2012. How then can the takeaway be that white women won it for Trump?
Suggesting she was lying about something she remembers him saying probably hurt his chances here.
Mmm hmm. Wonder why she made that attack unprovoked.
Ok.If he said it and denied it on TV, it would be understandable that she wouldn’t endorse him.
This really doesn't make any sense to me. Either it's worth talking about both white women and white men as voting demographics, or it's not worth talking about either of them. Besides, if the 2012 Exit Poll numbers aren't completely wrong, then white women actually voted significantly more Democratic in 2016 than 2012. How then can the takeaway be that white women won it for Trump?
This is a good question.
Having only taken a quick glance at the numbers, Hillary did (43%) marginally better than Obama (42%) among white women, literally the only demographic the Democrats did better with compared to 2012.
At a guess, instead of looking at it from such a general perspective, I'd be more inclined to say that the greater issue was with how she performed among white voters (blue-collar workers in this case) away from her metropolitan strongholds, not just white people as a whole.