The premise of that argument is flawed and selfish. It’s this idea that people who can’t pay student loans are undeserving of an education. There are EBT cards and I don’t see affluent people getting salty over not having that even though they “did the right thing.” Also, with that logic, we shouldn’t have internet because some of us had to study from books before that. And it’s funny how these same people love say how much they love America and how patriotic and how Christian they are, but God forbid your taxes helped out other people.
The premise of that argument is flawed and selfish. It’s this idea that people who can’t pay student loans are undeserving of an education. There are EBT cards and I don’t see affluent people getting salty over not having that even though they “did the right thing.” Also, with that logic, we shouldn’t have internet because some of us had to study from books before that. And it’s funny how these same people love say how much they love America and how patriotic and how Christian they are, but God forbid your taxes helped out other people.
Not really. I know it sucks if some people missed out but that’s just the cost of moving forward. Are we going to prevent other measures like universal healthcare just because some people paid for expensive private insurance? Doing the “rightvthing” isn’t always the most rewarding. Society as a whole benefits, which is what the goal is in the end. Now perhaps if a case can be made where paying off loans put one in a huge financial burden, then maybe there is way to do a payback, but good luck managing that.Do you think the guy should get a refund ?
As I said in response to Raoul, it’s the unfortunate cost of progress. If I wamted to be a Republican about it, I could argue that they should have reconsidered taking a loan in the first place and done something more “responsible”. In the end, society benefits. And if you really love your country, you’ll be happy for your fellow Americans.I don’t feel bad for the people who are rich enough to put their kids through the best education money can buy, who might feel a bit pissed off that their financial advantage was curbed if everyone suddenly gets their debt cleared.
I sympathise with the minority of middle class folk who genuinely made real sacrifices in their life to save up and give their child the best chance they could possibly afford. Who would get no such reimbursement for their sensible and considered decision.
It’s a grey area for me. I believe education should be free and think that cancelling student debt would raise a huge burden on the middle class and below however it just seems very harsh that people will miss out for doing something commendable.
Not really. I know it sucks if some people missed out but that’s just the cost of moving forward. Are we going to prevent other measures like universal healthcare just because some people paid for expensive private insurance? Doing the “rightvthing” isn’t always the most rewarding. Society as a whole benefits, which is what the goal is in the end. Now perhaps if a case can be made where paying off loans put one in a huge financial burden, then maybe there is way to do a payback, but good luck managing that.
As I said in response to Raoul, it’s the unfortunate cost of progress. If I wamted to be a Republican about it, I could argue that they should have reconsidered taking a loan in the first place and done something more “responsible”. In the end, society benefits. And if you really love your country, you’ll be happy for your fellow Americans.
I don’t feel bad for the people who are rich enough to put their kids through the best education money can buy, who might feel a bit pissed off that their financial advantage was curbed if everyone suddenly gets their debt cleared.
I sympathise with the minority of middle class folk who genuinely made real sacrifices in their life to save up and give their child the best chance they could possibly afford. Who would get no such reimbursement for their sensible and considered decision.
It’s a grey area for me. I believe education should be free and think that cancelling student debt would raise a huge burden on the middle class and below however it just seems very harsh that people will miss out for doing something commendable.
Exactly, it has to start somewhere.
What Wazza should have said was 'feck off ya cheeky, selfish cnut'.
How about if somebody is 1/1024 black... Should they get full reparationsWarren should have asked if reparations should be given to all black people because they once suffered
Easy answer. 1/1024th of reparations.How about if somebody is 1/1024 black... Should they get full reparations
How about if somebody is 1/1024 black... Should they get full reparations
Its just one poll but
#MAGA
So I received a mailed in survey from the Democratic Senate something something organization. I did my part to put a nice fat checkmark next to Bernie and answer the other questions from a progressive point of view. On the suggestion/feedback to improve senate election results section, I finished my answer with “stop attacking Bernie”. When you see the next poll with Bernie at number one, I need no thanks. Just an honest days work.
Imagine taking this shitstain seriously
Very good question.
Do we do the same with Bernie because he LOST TO HILLARY (or do we have to wait for him to loose to biden or trump before he goes on the heap as well?)And to just top this off. Clinton has the gall to say "nobody likes bernie sanders". This coming from the candidate that was so self-obsessed and that she was god's gift to politics....she LOST TO DONALD TRUMP! An autocratic, alleged sexual assaulter gameshow host that paid people to attend his campaign announcement. Can we please just consign Hillary Clinton to the loser trash heap of history?
Very good question.
It's not a good question. It's the question of a greedy self centered feck.
I don't think the logic should stop people getting debt relief. People need debt relief. However, there are people that have faced financial ruin due to the debts. I also think they should get some compensation.No it isn't. Its the equivalent of asking for an extra pair of limbs because all the handicapped are getting one.
The idea that the people who are in debt are lazy and irresponsible is exactly the kind of conservative ideology that progressives mock when the GOP suggest cuts to welfare, medicare and so on and so forth.
That bloke clearly has the means to save, there are several others who want to attend college without parents who have the same means and the whole idea of equality in education falls apart as soon as you start suggesting that only the kids whose parents can afford to save get to graduate debt free.
College debt forgiveness is a population scale problem and it can't be rebuffed with individual outliers. The whole idea of reducing college debt is to make younger graduates be able to afford housing, spend money which stimulates the economy, start families earlier and then in turn educate their own children.
This is the equivalent of Jeff Bezos telling the regular Joe he sucks because he could not create an Amazon.com.
Do we do the same with Bernie because he LOST TO HILLARY (or do we have to wait for him to loose to biden or trump before he goes on the heap as well?)
I don't think the logic should stop people getting debt relief. People need debt relief. However, there are people that have faced financial ruin due to the debts. I also think they should get some compensation.
It's a fecking dumb question and is the definition of this country especially on the conservative side, greed, selfishness and a total disregard for anybody else's situation. That guy is a fecking idiot.Very good question.
Where have I said it is a bad idea?Well, now that becomes what-aboutism. Just because medical debt is not being forgiven doesn't mean college debt forgiveness is a bad idea.
I don't think the logic should stop people getting debt relief. People need debt relief. However, there are people that have faced financial ruin due to the debts. I also think they should get some compensation.
These are good points. Alternatively, using your example, I can see a person who went through a medical bankruptcy possibly feeling a bit aggrieved that they had to lose out.
Do we do the same with Bernie because he LOST TO HILLARY (or do we have to wait for him to loose to biden or trump before he goes on the heap as well?)
What accrues to people who don't currently have college debt because they either paid it off or because they never went to college is indeed an important question. It's a very large number of voters. If you guys think that college debt relief as a legislative proposal can easily just run over that portion of the electorate just because you're certain "it's the right thing to do" then you're living a pipe dream. Concessions will have to be made.
The takes, they're getting worse folks. More and more people tell me this, these are bad takes. We need to make takes great again.
MLK was a (the?) leader in the anti-Vietnam movement!
What accrues to people who don't currently have college debt because they either paid it off or because they never went to college is indeed an important question. It's a very large number of voters. If you guys think that college debt relief as a legislative proposal can easily just run over that portion of the electorate just because you're certain "it's the right thing to do" then you're living a pipe dream. Concessions will have to be made.
Where have I said it is a bad idea?
I am saying some that have paid the debt also need compensation.
Some would have lost houses, their business, porperty to clear the debt.
My angle is debt forgiveness is not enough.
https://apnews.com/0a737f5ec6f858829b51ea9b7e8bb41dCOLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A South Carolina elected official who endorsed Joe Biden last month is switching her allegiance to Bernie Sanders in the state’s first-in-the-South presidential primary, saying she had viewed the former vice president — whose support in the state is considered deep — as “a compromise choice.”