Redplane
Massive moobs (planned for Christmas)
Good to see the trolls coming out on the caf too
Gabbard is not doing herself many favors with that tweet. I dislike Hillary with a passion but with the tweet Gabbard made she seems to add to the suspicion, not dispel it.
This fecking guy:
Fantastic stuff.
Every word true.
Tulsi back on her favorite show/network. Can't imagine many Dem primary voters watch this, so who precisely is she attempting to reach on Fox ?
"Queen of the Harpies!"Gabbard said:Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.
She’s likely not wrong but it may not have anything to do with Tulsi’s intent and everything to do with her strange positions, which gives Russian troll campaigns a perfect staging point for their usual divide and conquer tactics. Stein and Gabbard are just useful idiots in this regard.
The next democratic president should troll Putin and appoint Browder as the Russia advisor.
Her running as an independent would take more away from Trump than it would the Democrat candidate. Especially when you see how much “support” she’s garnering from the right wing.
Hard to say, there are still lefties that are smitten with her, who if Biden or Warren are the nominee would almost certainly vote for her in a Jill Stein sort of way.
Indian politics is very divisive if the Kashmir thread is anything to go by.
The majority there are Hindus. Certainly the current government has contributed to a lot of the problems there.
But the US cannot alienate India or China for example.
But what we do need in any party are different views.
A view that goes against what Hillary stands for is certainly a good place to start.
Indian politics is very divisive if the Kashmir thread is anything to go by.
The majority there are Hindus. Certainly the current government has contributed to a lot of the problems there.
But the US cannot alienate India or China for example.
But what we do need in any party are different views.
A view that goes against what Hillary stands for is certainly a good place to start.
Hard to say, there are still lefties that are smitten with her, who if Biden or Warren are the nominee would almost certainly vote for her in a Jill Stein sort of way.
No one is writing in Tulsi or Bernie if Warren is the nominee.
Biden on the hand, yes I will write in Tulsi solely due to your posts if Biden is the nominee.
I wonder how you would feel about Biden being directly supported by a right-wing nationalist foreign leader. Would he get a pass too?
She is supported by Putin....err because Hillary says so?
If there is proof she is a Russian asset she should be treated as an enemy agent as Trump will be after he is out of office. That wont happen if Biden is president btw.
Ridiculous question about Biden.
He may be brain dead but he is no traitor as Trump is.
btw I have no intention of voting for Biden if he is the nominee.
I will hold my nose and vote for Warren though if she is.
But Bernie has not given up and neither have I.
She is supported by Putin....err because Hillary says so?
If there is proof she is a Russian asset she should be treated as an enemy agent as Trump will be after he is out of office. That wont happen if Biden is president btw.
Ridiculous question about Biden.
He may be brain dead but he is no traitor as Trump is.
btw I have no intention of voting for Biden if he is the nominee.
I will hold my nose and vote for Warren though if she is.
But Bernie has not given up and neither have I.
I hope you're right, but somehow I'm not so sure.
And people wonder why America was dumb enough to elect Trump
I am talking about Modi.
And people wonder why America was dumb enough to elect Trump
Of course you have proof she is being directed by Modi.
Who said anything about being directed by Modi? I am talking about how she's being supported by them, and it should have been obvious that's what I was talking about since that's what you were talking about in the post I quoted. It's impossible to discuss with you, because you jump to the most extreme possible position of the argument and assume that's what you're debating against.
You are becoming a worse and worse poster as the days go on. Just thought that should be pointed out to you.You are simply spouting liberal media talking points. What is the implication of saying she is being supported by them?
What has she done in Congress that proves she has acted against any community or only for certain communities?
First the Russian connection. Now the Modi/Hindu connection. Its just slander.
You are simply spouting liberal media talking points. What is the implication of saying she is being supported by them?
What has she done in Congress that proves she has acted against any community or only for certain communities?
First the Russian connection. Now the Modi/Hindu connection. Its just slander.
Any thoughts on the extensive article posted above on this very page?
https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/american-sangh-affair-tulsi-gabbard
You are becoming a worse and worse poster as the days go on. Just thought that should be pointed out to you.