2020 US Elections | Biden certified as President | Dems control Congress

Status
Not open for further replies.
On average, what percentage of Trump's time - excluding sleeping - is spent watching TV, twittering and playing golf? I'd guess about 70%.

In terms of the work that a President needs to doing, he must be the most absentee-President ever.
 
I'd love for the Georgia thing to get out of hand and have loads of his supporters boycott.

Preferably due to Trump scuppering it himself by not being able to resist saying something stupid about how they screwed him by not fight harder for him.
 
Can't wait for them to claim this is all part of their genius plan to get the case taken up to the SCOTUS

Edit: Damn, they've already beat me to it
 
sammsky1 said:
Click to expand...

Forget Biden, they should be investigating how this cnut got 70 million votes. I would love to see the signature matches in red counties. If there was any voter fraud in this country guaranteed it was his voters.
 
vodrake said:
Can't wait for them to claim this is all part of their genius plan to get the case taken up to the SCOTUS

Edit: Damn, they've already beat me to it
Click to expand...

Who will argue the case in front of the SCOTUS? Her or Guiliani?
 
vodrake said:
Can't wait for them to claim this is all part of their genius plan to get the case taken up to the SCOTUS

Edit: Damn, they've already beat me to it
Click to expand...


What a conspiracy! Republican-appointed judges, Republican Governors, Republican Secretaries of States, Republican vote-counters ... they're all in on it!
 
GlastonSpur said:
What a conspiracy! Republican-appointed judges, Republican Governors, Republican Secretaries of States, Republican vote-counters ... they're all in on it!
Click to expand...

Not only Republican, one of the judges was specifically appointed by Trump himself. Looks like he's been compromised too! Who can you even trust these days?
 
vodrake said:
Can't wait for them to claim this is all part of their genius plan to get the case taken up to the SCOTUS

Edit: Damn, they've already beat me to it
Click to expand...

You seem to get a few Trump supporters very happy that this could go to the SCOTUS, where they have Trump appointed judges like it's not a completely mental thing to be wanting.
 
Methinks alot of these judges buttered up Trump and used him to get appointed and not give twofecks about him afterwards bar the obvious weirdo cretins who follow him like he's the second rendition of Charles Mansen.
 
Why doesn’t Trumps PA case just get thrown out instead of upwards to the SCOTUS?
So, if I have a shitty case I can just keep getting it denied until I argue it all the way to the top. At what point do shitty cases just get thrown in the bin?
 
Last edited:
utdalltheway said:
Why doesn’t Trumps PA case just get thrown out instead of upwards to the SCOTUS?
So, if I have a shitty case I can just keep getting it denied until I argue it all the way to the top. At what point do shitty cases just get thrown in the bin?
Click to expand...

Isn't it the same in the UK where you can get your case to the high court?
 
utdalltheway said:
Why doesn’t Trumps PA case just get thrown out instead of upwards to the SCOTUS?
So, if I have a shitty case I can just keep getting it denied until I argue it all the way to the top. At what point do shitty cases just get thrown in the bin?
Click to expand...
My understanding is that any case may reach the SC but they are not required to accept it.
 
The Firestarter said:
My understanding is that any case may reach the SC but they are not required to accept it.
Click to expand...

Your understanding is correct. Judge Bibas crafted a pretty compelling opinion, i'm really not sure that it'll ever go to SCOTUS.
 
Last edited:
Oly Francis said:
Your understanding is correct. Judge Bibas crafter a pretty compelling opinion, i'm really not sure that it'll ever go to SCOTUS.
Click to expand...

fingers crossed, but it does go to show how political the court is now. They just assume it's inevitable that THEIR judges will take up the case. Instead of three branches, they're acting like it's a judicial wing on the GOP.

"oh we keep losing in embarrassing lawsuits where each judge viciously scalds us for conspiracy law suits.....no matter, the SCOTUS is Republican"
 
WPMUFC said:
fingers crossed, but it does go to show how political the court is now. They just assume it's inevitable that THEIR judges will take up the case. Instead of three branches, they're acting like it's a judicial wing on the GOP.

"oh we keep losing in embarrassing lawsuits where each judge viciously scalds us for conspiracy law suits.....no matter, the SCOTUS is Republican"
Click to expand...

It's not that much though, Brett Kavanaugh already ruled several times against Trump. Elite republicans like them aren't really Trumptards.
 
What would it say about the Roberts court if the Republicans shout it from the rooftops that you must hear the case because we put you guys there so rule in our favor. In an election that was lost by bigger margins than '16 and after every lower court basically laughed it out of the building.
If it does get there I predict a 7-2 against trump with Alito and Thomas in the opposition, being the absolute cnuts they are.
 
Oly Francis said:
Your understanding is correct. Judge Bibas crafted a pretty compelling opinion, i'm really not sure that it'll ever go to SCOTUS.
Click to expand...

I'm just going by what I've read elsewhere, but it seems they're only appealing the denied request to amend the original complaint? So even in the infinitely slim case that the SC take up the case and for whatever reason rule in favour of Trump, all that happens is that the amended case gets sent back down to the bottom level to start again? And then presumably it will just get thrown out again because they still haven't produced any actual evidence.

It's been sold to Trump supporters that they just need to get it to the SCOTUS and then BOOM, they overthrow the election, but it doesn't seem to be anything like that in even the best case scenario for them.
 
Oh, Dear

The Trump campaign had to pay $3 million for the recount in Wisconsin.

 
GiddyUp said:
What would it say about the Roberts court if the Republicans shout it from the rooftops that you must hear the case because we put you guys there so rule in our favor. In an election that was lost by bigger margins than '16 and after every lower court basically laughed it out of the building.
If it does get there I predict a 7-2 against trump with Alito and Thomas in the opposition, being the absolute cnuts they are.
Click to expand...
Alito is evil cnut, but I fear ACB has the potential to be the same. In case Dem win the runoffs, they should pack the court pronto.
 
Drifter said:
Oh, Dear

The Trump campaign had to pay $3 million for the recount in Wisconsin.

Click to expand...


His gullible supporter marks will have to pay it, you mean.

"Drifter! EVERYONE else has heard God Emperor Trump's cry for justice and bravely put their hand in their life savings for the Glorious Justice Fund. Why haven't YOU??"
 
The Firestarter said:
Alito is evil cnut, but I fear ACB has the potential to be the same. In case Dem win the runoffs, they should pack the court pronto.
Click to expand...
Manchin already said that he is gonna vote against it. Hickenlooper (who isn’t as centrist as Manchin) said so too. And I guess there are other Democrat senators who might vote against it. Schumer really will have a tough fight in his hands to make this happen, and I do not see how he can manage to do so (especially with Manchin who is extremely stubborn and typically is one of the few politicians who seems to keep his word).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.