That female map is basically my somewhat optimistic map from early this year 
2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Kellyanne doing spin doctor role with Anderson Cooper now. It's cringeworthy to see how money talks for this woman.
We should start calling them mental contortionists at this point because it goes waaaay beyond gymnastics.
I'd go with Gobshite Party, they can even keep their acronym
Too soon.
I can state with absolute certainty that it will not be SC
As an Arizona resident I would say it's either AZ or UT. AZ more likely because of Mormons + Latinos whereas you only have Mormons in UT as a potential voting block that will swing the vote.
In two elections I guarantee that AZ will be a blue state by then (provided the political trends stay the same). The demographic shift is mind boggling and Latinos will be either a majority or close.
Just saw this during Hannity
Not sure az would be that much of a surprise.
I'm in Phoenix at the moment. Seems like AZ would be a logical flip contender because of the Latino population as well as 6% mormon. Georgia, Texas, Alaska, or Missouri are also contenders.
BTW....if its Texas.....then Trump might as well quit now.
Could anyone suggest a site where I can place a bet on the US election? I don't want to be spending time in this thread for nothing! 
Saying Georgia
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...man-quits-party-in-viral-twitter-rant-w444345
Are the republicans losing an entire generation of women in this election? Because that would be amazing for the country, and by extension the world.
Are the republicans losing an entire generation of women in this election? Because that would be amazing for the country, and by extension the world.
Rick Wilson tbf didn't say it would be a surprise, just said that it would be a collapse in a red state of which AZ has been consistently for a long time.
He's obviously seen some GOP internal polling that inspired the tweet.
This is pretty depressing - https://www.buzzfeed.com/emaoconnor...fecking-monkey?utm_term=.whmopL9bL#.txPx1j2vj
The censor curse strikes twice @langster
Michelle Obama president in 2020 and 2024.
She absolutly fantastic
She absolutly fantastic
November 28th? Really....
Think this guy has reached the point where he has actually put more effort into getting Trump elected than Paul Ryan.
I've read that first tweet about six times and still don't get wtf he's on about.
He's saying the denominator is lying.
We all know that divisors have a long standing liberal bias.
Last edited:
The Denald/Donald confusion is real. Saw this tweet earlier and actually thought it was one of the less ridiculous ones Trump had fired off today:
Ok cool, which bit do you want to try and dispute?
A central part of Trump's campaign is to fight ISIS. American Isolationism isn't what Trump has in mind when he talks about expanding the military and eradicating ISIS.
This is the problem with a loose cannon like Trump. He makes completely contradictory statements without ever divulging into details
Whereas the opposite candidate is directly involved with Isis. Hmm, awkward.
http://endingthefed.com/its-over-hi...ts-worse-than-anyone-could-have-imagined.html
Do you even read through these tons of links you drop in these threads?
That site's articles look like they are written by a 15 year old (moron).
Last edited:
I was talking about Trump. Regardless of Clinton's positions, that link does nothing to support your point that Trump will lead to a decrease of US military intervention.
Also, lulz at that bullshit link.
Funny that.
I particularly find funny the way Hilary has said I apologise for using this email account and everyone's gone "ok then", as though that's it, ok then Hilary. We'll ignore the actual content, as long as you're sorry you used a hackable email that's fine.
I particularly find funny the way Hilary has said I apologise for using this email account and everyone's gone "ok then", as though that's it, ok then Hilary. We'll ignore the actual content, as long as you're sorry you used a hackable email that's fine.
No youre right, it doesn't. I've only got what he said to go by.
They're both unsuitable for the candidancy is my stance btw.
- Status