Didn't travel apparentlyNo maguire on the bench...
Didn't travel apparentlyNo maguire on the bench...
He should have made it last week.So he didn’t put Maguire in the squad - seems to be making a point
Why? He did nothing to suggest he should start.
Exactly this. We have only this midfield. No injuries and I highly doubt another signing. ETH has to make it work.The team have spent months working on this new system. Very unlikely we abandon it immediately after 1 match.
Why? He did nothing to suggest he should start.
His cameo was ok, but not game changing like some deluded fanboys said it was.It's amazing that people still haven't learnt that Sancho playing decently for 20 minutes from time to time doesn't mean anything. His problem has always been consistency. His last cameo was good, by his atrocious standards, but nothing spectacular warranting a start as some have suggested.
I would rather us have kept Fred and sold McTominay. Think he can cover for Casimero better than Scotty.Us not selling Maguire and McTominay makes our squad look so much shittier.
And Ten Hag will really pisss me off if we dont make adjustments in our set up today.
I'm not saying he does. Just that given that Garnacho maybe had his worst game in a United shirt and Rashford looked awful centrally as well, that he could easily feel he'd done enough to get himself a start this time with his cameo against Wolves and good performances in pre-season.
Not suggesting he has or should kick a stink up with the manager or anything like that at all. I hope the call is right and Garnacho tears them up.
There's nothing to it. I was just responding to the notion that he has a right (and V.O. was being kind) to feel aggrieved because Garnacho had a stinker in the opening game of the season. How many times has Sancho let the club down? Anyway, ETH probably went with the "i give you the opportunity to redeem yourselves" logic for this one. I hope it works, otherwise it's going to be a very long Saturday night on the Caf.
It'll look better/stronger with Hojlund, Mainoo, Amad available... I do agree we need another midfielder though.The squad lacks depth in midfield and attack. This hasn't been addressed.
The team have spent months working on this new system. Very unlikely we abandon it immediately after 1 match.
Yes, and? What is your point? That just shows how AWFUL Sancho is. Face reality, Garnacho and Antony are better performing players than Sancho.We are literally starting Antony and Garnacho, not Rooney and Ronaldo.
Yes, and? What is your point? That just shows how AWFUL Sancho is. Face reality, Garnacho and Antony are better performing players than Sancho.
I would rather us have kept Fred and sold McTominay. Think he can cover for Casimero better than Scotty.
I did. And Sancho was OK. He didn't change the game and showed nothing to suggest he should start over them. It was a typical Sancho performance. At least the other two try to do something.Clearly you didn’t actually watch the game last week I see.
I don't see many people "bitching defeat". There's plenty of valid concern and criticism over the team selection and tactics, especially after last week's performance.
Clearly you didn’t actually watch the game last week I see.
I really don’t get this 2 keepers on the bench thing.
The chances of subbing the keeper are very low and a double keeper sub, close to totally unlikely.
This is such a waste of options, even if we have a thin bench of backup players.
Meanwhile, ETH is stubbornly sticking to his game plan from last Monday night.
Spurs will be having a right laugh.
.
Why would three unproven players make this better? Listen to yourself, this is naive.It'll look better/stronger with Hojlund, Mainoo, Amad available... I do agree we need another midfielder though.
Don't get naming two keepers, rather than Hannibal (he shouldn't be now playing U21's).
Issue with Fred is you never know if you're going to get an 8/10 performance or a 2/10 performance. Hell, sometimes you'll get both in the same game.I would rather us have kept Fred and sold McTominay. Think he can cover for Casimero better than Scotty.
Sancho fanboy, they think he can do no wrong and it's the rest of the team that is at fault for his woeful performances.So you're basing your whole assessment on a players ability by the single game last week? Recency bias to the extreme. Two years of poor performances from Sancho, mixed with the odd twenty minutes he actually looks useful every five games isn't big enough a sample size though?
Sancho fanboy, they think he can do no wrong and it's the rest of the team that is at fault for his woeful performances.
Better as in not looking as weak/lack of options.Why would three unproven players make this better? Listen to yourself, this is naive.
A lot of players in the team have them. Martial is another example. Meanwhile players like Rashford and Bruno get demonised by these fanboys despite being our best and most productive players.I can't imagine another fanbase defending a player who has played so poorly over such a long period of time. Our standards have dropped off a cliff, sadly.
Michael Oliver