Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
I believe so.
Any clue on Telles?
Not really, I think he may be close, or ready.
I believe so.
Any clue on Telles?
5 yearsWe ain't spurs.
We play on Saturday so it should be a mix of mostly first teamers and backup options. You can bet West Ham will be taking this seriously especially after the manner in which we just beat them.
You can do that against Norwich though. Probably play the entire U18s and give a good account of themselves.Amad is injured and i'm doubtful Mejbri features. Liverpool on the other hand are expected to hand a debut to 16 year old Kaide Gordon tonight according to reports and Klopp's assistant Ljinders is quoted as saying it's more important to show the kids a clear pathway to the first team than winning the competition.
It seems they're using the competition to give opportunities to a few of their younger players.
I doubt it. They also have 2 games a week and hardly have the deepest squad. They have Leeds away on Sat( winnable game). What do you think Moyes will prioritise?We play on Saturday so it should be a mix of mostly first teamers and backup options. You can bet West Ham will be taking this seriously especially after the manner in which we just beat them.
It's not just Norwich though, Klopp has given a debut to a 16 year old fullback against Wolves in the FA Cup in recent years and last year he selected two teenagers in his back 4 against Arsenal in the Carabao Cup.You can do that against Norwich though. Probably play the entire U18s and give a good account of themselves.
West Ham are a whole different ball game. Their bench against us was full of experience. If we genuinely want to progress in this competition then a decent side with the strength in depth must be fielded.
Of course Elanga, Shoretire could figure
The media did. SAF never ever chose a team he didn’t think could win a match be it League Cup or otherwise. How many times did he win it? 4 and two losing finalists.It's not just Norwich though, Klopp has given a debut to a 16 year old fullback against Wolves in the FA Cup in recent years and last year he selected two teenagers in his back 4 against Arsenal in the Carabao Cup.
And Ljinders is quoted as saying 'it's more important to bring in the youth than even win the competition' There was a time under Fergie when some in the media referred to the League Cup as the 'worthless Cup'
Do we have to be Spurs to want to win a trophy? This is our first opportunity….We ain't spurs.
Klopp isn't throwing the game either because he's selecting players who he thinks can win the the game aswell. Last year against Arsenal he fielded two teenagers in his backline and the game was goalless in normal time with Arsenal winning on pens.The media did. SAF never ever chose a team he didn’t think could win a match be it League Cup or otherwise. How many times did he win it? 4 and two losing finalists.
All this about throwing the game because we have other priorities is bollocks and I don’t give two shits what Liverpool think. They are playing a crap championship side, we’re not! As for Liverpool bringing through youth nonsense. We’ve given far more opportunities to kids than they have
McT needs game time
Klopp isn't throwing the game either because he's selecting players who he thinks can win the the game aswell. Last year against Arsenal he fielded two teenagers in his backline and the game was goalless in normal time with Arsenal winning on pens.
I couldn't give a shit about the Carabao Cup and would rather see us field a few young players who are showing the potential to become first team players which will help in their development IMO.
I'm not ignoring the bloated squad at all and it's due to that very reason I believe some of the younger players haven't been given the opportunity that they should've got. But you can't just put that down to the board and the manager has to also take some responsibility aswell.You're ignoring the main issue though which is the bloated first team squad. I'm counting 24 first team outfield players (excluding the likes of Amad, Elanga, Mejbri, Mengi). Even in a pure B team there would be several first teamers missing out before we even get to the youngsters.
We're happy to keep duds around forever (Jones, Bailly, Mata, Martial etc.) which obviously has a knock-on effect. Those duds will automatically steal game time from youngsters. It's daft to use Klopp's situation as a direct comparison because he doesn't have our squad depth and on top of that he has 4-5 players unavailable. A couple of kids are bound to get into his rotated cup team by default.
The question is why we dish out new contracts to undeserving players? And why do we pay them so high wages that they'd rather rot on the bench here than find a team where they'll actually get some game time? First and foremost we need a ruthless transfer/contract policy if we want to see more young players get a proper chance.
I'm not ignoring the bloated squad at all and it's due to that very reason I believe some of the younger players haven't been given the opportunity that they should've got. But you can't just put that down to the board and the manager has to also take some responsibility aswell.
I agree mate. Klopp could've easily have played Jota over 16 year old Kaide Gordon tonight but he didn't. So we can blame the board for a lot of things but they don't force Ole to only select the more established players. I hope Elanga at least gets a chance.He can choose to use Hannibal instead of Mata or Elanga instead of someone else. It's entirely up to him so I don't get the "we have a big squad". Does it say in Mata's contract that he must play? Not that I get why he got a new contract in the first place but it seems surreal that we just seem to hand out new contracts and playing time to deadwood for no apparent reason. City and Liverpool played plenty of youngsters tonight without bragging about how much they give youth a chance. United certainly won't do the same and I doubt we will see some champagne football regardless. Ole has talked a lot about giving youth a chance but he seems to have given up on that completely in the last 1-2 seasons.
I'm not ignoring the bloated squad at all and it's due to that very reason I believe some of the younger players haven't been given the opportunity that they should've got. But you can't just put that down to the board and the manager has to also take some responsibility aswell.
I agree mate. Klopp could've easily have played Jota over 16 year old Kaide Gordon tonight but he didn't. So we can blame the board for a lot of things but they don't force Ole to only select the more established players. I hope Elanga at least gets a chance.
You've mentioned Mata which you confess was on Ole but Donny Van de Beek who has been severely under used is also on Ole, because according to the players agent he would've also moved on loan to Everton until Solskjaer intervened and put a stop to that. Solskjaer was also reported to have wanted to keep Dan James even after the club bought Ronaldo but the decision was taken out his hands if the reports are anything to go by. He also wants to keep Lingard when IMO many other managers would've sidelined Lingard a long time ago.The manager also has to take his fair share of the blame obviously. Mata's extra year is on Ole imo. Yes he might be a professional guy and good in the dressing room but on the pitch he's a waste of time. Any minutes he plays this season should've gone to the youngsters.
But any manager (apart from LVG) would love to have as many players as possible. Klopp would've probably preferred to keep the likes of Ings, Lovren, Ibe, Brewster etc. if he could and money wasn't an issue. After all he has kept Ox and Origi and they've been non-existent for years. Managers are hoarders and sometimes you need the board/DOF to tell you "look this guy isn't offering us anything, we won't give him a new contract". That should have been done with the likes of Jones, Bailly and Mata.
Jota has started all their games bar one this season because of Firmino's injuries. So why on earth could Jota 'easily have played' if the point is to rotate players? Milner would've played tonight if he hadn't been a last minute replacement for TAA at the weekend. If Milner, Thiago, Elliot and Firmino all were available, would the 16 year old have started? Probably not. Klopp could've also given minutes to Balagizi but he chose to sub on Henderson instead, why did he go for the more established player when the game was done and dusted at 3-0?
I just don't get this constant mentioning of what Klopp is doing when the context is entirely different. Klopp started all of his first team players who were short of minutes (Gomez, Konate, Jones, Ox, Minamino, Origi, Tsimikas, Keita) tonight. He didn't have anyone else available from the first team squad who needed minutes. That meant he could use the final two spots to experiment. Compare that to Ole who has 11-12 first team players in need of minutes. It's a lazy argument to keep mentioning Klopp's selection of a 16 year old when he didn't have one other first teamer in need of game time on the bench.
He will startJones will be in the matchday squad.
Would be nice to spell his last name right.Would be nice to see Elangaga feature at some point. He’s always impressed in the limited senior squad showing. With his pace and pressing, he can take the Dan James profile in the squad.
It was intentional, tidraKS. Because his pace makes fans gaga.Would be nice to spell his last name right.
Any relation to lady gaga. I”ll get my coat nowWould be nice to see Elangaga feature at some point. He’s always impressed in the limited senior squad showing. With his pace and pressing, he can take the Dan James profile in the squad.
Appart from the guy who got injured, who is featuring regularly from the academy for them ?It's not just Norwich though, Klopp has given a debut to a 16 year old fullback against Wolves in the FA Cup in recent years and last year he selected two teenagers in his back 4 against Arsenal in the Carabao Cup.
And Ljinders is quoted as saying 'it's more important to bring in the youth than even win the competition' There was a time under Fergie when some in the media referred to the League Cup as the 'worthless Cup'
What, we got done out of 2 stonewall penalties and they got gifted theirs and fecked it up? What 'manner in which we beat them', exactly? They were lucky not to lose 4-1, the cnuts.
Jonathan Moss