Eddy_JukeZ
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Messages
- 17,685
We are a team in progress. Anyone thinking just because we’ve hit the ground running that we’re back, is really looking at the game with red tinted specs
I never said 'we're back'
We are a team in progress. Anyone thinking just because we’ve hit the ground running that we’re back, is really looking at the game with red tinted specs
Get your tee-pee ready boys & girls. We're in for a squeaky one today
It's like he doesn't understand that it's a red precisely because you want to discourage players from making tackles like that because they can break a leg regardless of force. The big difference isn't the amount of force from the offender, it's whether the foot is planted or not and gives way as the studs come in or not. Idiot.Le Tessier "if there was more force to it then it could be red" wtf. If there was more force then Romeu would have broken Mason's leg!
That’s like saying that a punch to the face needs more force to be considered a red! A punch is a punch!Le Tessier "if there was more force to it then it could be red" wtf. If there was more force then Romeu would have broken Mason's leg!
This is a stupid fecking post.
well Pogba was involved in 3 goals
The next step for Ole and our development is bypassing the press. We've looked a bit shaky, but it can be rectified going forward when dealing with pressing sides.
First real test? You serious?ole's first real test coming up this half
It would be nice if for a change black players are judged on talent snd not athleticism thats all
I wonder how Le Tissier is even relevant in football today.
SKY showed it Matt LeTissie said it wasn’t a red, plonker!
It wasn't a racial bias at all in this case.Typical.
Btw to those getting their pants in a twist @lsd has highlighted a racial bias in commentary, he’s called no one a racist so calm down & enjoy the game.
Everyone with a brain can see the intent, gary neville saw through ti right away. Le tissier is either lying through his teeth or he is really that thickScholes and Shearer both ssaying it was a nasty challenge on Mason.
If you can be bothered, read my first 2 posts in game thread after start: complimenting Pogba on 2 good passes. Read my comment on match performance thread last game: complimentary assessment.No, not really. Have a look and you'll see posters calling him all sorts. @sammsky1 is a good starting point but that particular poster hates Pogba with a passion.
Calling him sloppy is fine btw but having an obvious agenda is quite another thing.
I’d quite like for every VAR check for there to be an official explanation as to why they came to the decision they did.
Get Bailly on in the 90th minute specifically to wipe out that cnut Romeu.
Yeah they just need to get through this. Not sure they can get through Palace before the Chelsea game either.The players look a bit tired to me
AWB,Matic,Pogba and Bruno especially
Was he ever really relevant? He's just lucky he's part of that Sky Sports old boys club.
Nothing wrong with providing an explanation.
They did on Pick, Le Tis decided it was not a red cardDid Sky or any other show that tackle on Greenwood? From what I was watching it was Scholars and Shearer it was not even mentioned at all.
Rashford!!
1:1
Chris Kavanagh