gajender
Full Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 4,140
Whilst I probably wouldn't go with that formation, 352 is not a defensive formation. It depends how you approach the game with it. Guess the same can said for every other formation really.
If we were to play that, we'd hardly have 5 at the back, as our wing backs will be pushed on high, as would our two strikers and two centre midfielders, thus effectively having 6 players attack, in comparison to the 5 when we play a 4231.
As I said, not sure Ole will go with it, but its hardly a defensive formation.
And what's stopping fullbacks from attacking and pushing higher up field in 4231 .As you said all formations can be defensive or attacking depending on the intent but you are basically sacrificing an attacker for defender when it's quite clear our fullbacks suddenly won't develop attacking prowess just because they are pushed up field.