Superunknown
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 9,481
I hope that we score a really dodgy, jammy, contentious goal now. Just to balance out not getting this one.
So why was the Salah goal vs Wolves given? The defender wasn't in complete control when he was stretching to header the ballClear the foam from your mouth or you'll be getting points soon. He is not in complete control of the ball. That's what is now required by the rule to make a player onside.
No it wasn’t, the pass didn’t go anywhere near him. It was for Fernandes. Defenders dodgy clearance is what got it to Weghorst.The pass was intended for Weghorst, that's why he's offside, that it didn't reach him isn't relevant
The Reading player tried to clear the ball. You forgot this part of the quote that is actually relevant.
VAR fecked it up.
If Licha was on the pitch we'd be winning. He releases the ball outta the back so much quicker than Maguire and Lindelof. Even Shaw at centre back.
Evidently not.I know the laws.
The pass was intended for Weghorst, that's why he's offside, that it didn't reach him isn't relevant
calling it one of those "Old Trafford decisions"
Clear the foam from your mouth or you'll be getting points soon. He is not in complete control of the ball. That's what is now required by the rule to make a player onside.
Are you ok mate?The pass was intended for Weghorst, that's why he's offside, that it didn't reach him isn't relevant
The pass was intended for Weghorst, that's why he's offside, that it didn't reach him isn't relevant
So by that logic, why was this a goal?
One final time, for the rule he needs to be in possession of the ball, not flicking it while mid air. Read it 25 times, you might get it.I'll stop foaming when it finally gets into your brain It's like arguing with a 5 year old.
Nothing in the wording you've just posted says anything about complete control. I will never agree with you on this, as we have LITERAL VIDEO PROOF of a goal that was scored a month ago that was allowed. If you're happy being screwed that's on you.
I genuinely wonder about this forum sometimes. Are people watching on 12" screens after drinking 6 pints? It couldn't be clearer.Some of the comments in here are confusing the hell out of me, the ball flew to the other side of the box
Pundits here say VAR made a clear mistake. As the Reading defender sticks his leg out, it is a deliberate move on his part. Therefore, there can be no offside in the situation.
No he doesn't, and you're still not explaining why the Salah goal counted but ours wouldn't. thanks for the talk.One final time, for the rule he needs to be in possession of the ball, not flicking it while mid air. Read it 25 times, you might get it.
Clear the foam from your mouth or you'll be getting points soon. He is not in complete control of the ball. That's what is now required by the rule to make a player onside.
It’s so not. How can you be so confidently wrong and then stick to it like shit in a stick?Clear the foam from your mouth or you'll be getting points soon. He is not in complete control of the ball. That's what is now required by the rule to make a player onside.
The pass was intended for Weghorst, that's why he's offside, that it didn't reach him isn't relevant
Getting Licha on for Harry will make a huge difference m
Evidently not.
Quicker passing from the back. Build up make goalsWhy?
We need goals.
NO HE DOESNT. Are you thick or a troll?One final time, for the rule he needs to be in possession of the ball, not flicking it while mid air. Read it 25 times, you might get it.
Getting Licha on for Harry will make a huge difference m
So by your own definition Salahs should have been chalked off?One final time, for the rule he needs to be in possession of the ball, not flicking it while mid air. Read it 25 times, you might get it.
He's just digging mate. Can't admit he got it wrong so doubling down. heh.NO HE DOESNT. Are you thick or a troll?
We are making chances, it is finishing we are not doing.Quicker passing from the back. Build up make goals
Darren England