Silverman
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,557
Probably because all our derbys or rivals lately have been title challengers.This doesn't feel like a "derby" game, or a game vs rival.
Probably because all our derbys or rivals lately have been title challengers.This doesn't feel like a "derby" game, or a game vs rival.
I take comfort in statistics: We're BOUND to score the first goal eventually. The odds increase for every game. So I'm feeling confident that we'll get the first goal in this one. And this team does not lose if they score first.
Spurs say hi
Why not play one of them & partner him with someone who can actually play football like Donny or Pogba? Why do we need 2 DMs at home to a promoted team?I’d go with McT and Fred in CM. Leeds throw bodies forward and I could well see us getting caught out on the break, early on.
Especially based on our recent approach of conceding before we start playing, would be nice to keep it solid.
Same reason we needed two DM's against a team about to be relegated. Thats all he knows.Why not play one of them & partner him with someone who can actually play football like Donny or Pogba? Why do we need 2 DMs at home to a promoted team?
It’s just excessive, both Scott & Fred to a lesser extent offer nothing on the ball. Play one of them sure, but both? I can’t understand why any fan would want that. It’s basically surrendering the initiative from the kickoff whistle. We shouldn’t need to stop Leeds, we have more than enough to impose ourselves on them. They should be worried about stopping us. Starting McT & Fred would tell me that our primary concern is to stop Leeds, rather than play our own game.Same reason we needed two DM's against a team about to be relegated. Thats all he knows.
Why not play one of them & partner him with someone who can actually play football like Donny or Pogba? Why do we need 2 DMs at home to a promoted team?
Yes but we don't talk about Lord Voldemort.
But besides the classical outlier match that all teams have (Aston Villa - Liverpool 7-2, Mancester City - Leicester 2 - 5 etc) - This team has a good history of winning or at minimum drawing games they score first in that spans nearly 10 years.
In fact, The last time Manchester United lost a game after scoring first in the Premier League was back in Sir Alex' days. As far back as 01. March 2011 in a 2-1 loss against Chelsea at Old Trafford.
More like Crystal Palace pulled down their pants.Liverpool put down a huge marker today. COME ON UNITED, let's win this one and keep the pressure up on them. They've won 9 out of 14, we need to win our next 2 to be at 9 out of 14 as well.
The team that wins most games wins the league.
It may be that they get their 20th title this year, equalling our record but let's not go down without a fight. Forget the rest, this season is about us and them.
Liverpool put down a huge marker today. COME ON UNITED, let's win this one and keep the pressure up on them. They've won 9 out of 14, we need to win our next 2 to be at 9 out of 14 as well.
The team that wins most games wins the league.
It may be that they get their 20th title this year, equalling our record but let's not go down without a fight. Forget the rest, this season is about us and them.
Simply not true. We lost to Swansea twice in 5 months after going a goal up in both games. 2015.In fact, The last time Manchester United lost a game after scoring first in the Premier League was back in Sir Alex' days. As far back as 01. March 2011 in a 2-1 loss against Chelsea at Old Trafford.
Simply not true. We lost to Swansea twice in 5 months after going a goal up in both games. 2015.
As recently as last year we lost to Wolves away after going 1-0 up. It may be rare but the Spurs game wasn’t a complete freak.
Based on what? I saw him defend pretty well against Sheffield Utd
They are a poor side. They absolutely leak goals. We should be proactive not reactive. Who cares what Leeds are going to do? We have better players then them.Saying newly promoted team would suggest that Leeds are a poor side, which they’re not, and surely if there’s one thing that COVID impacted football has taught us is that there isn’t a home advantage.
My concern is that Leeds are gung-ho and throw bodies forward, given our recent run of games and track record of conceding first, we may need that extra protection.
Yeah you’re right. We’ve lost 60 league games since Ferguson retired and only 5 of them were we 1-0 up:Welp I guess I should have been a bit more cautious after scrolling through 10 years of gamestats. I stand corrected. Still, it's not a common occurence
The reasons why he would play both of them would be thatIt’s just excessive, both Scott & Fred to a lesser extent offer nothing on the ball. Play one of them sure, but both? I can’t understand why any fan would want that. It’s basically surrendering the initiative from the kickoff whistle. We shouldn’t need to stop Leeds, we have more than enough to impose ourselves on them. They should be worried about stopping us. Starting McT & Fred would tell me that our primary concern is to stop Leeds, rather than play our own game.
I swear to god I better not see mctominay or Fred in for Pogba here. The man has been saucing for the last few weeks, I don’t care if he’s leaving, he can help us win a title because on his day he’s the best midfielder in the world.
When was his last bad game?is that you, Mino?
but yep - play the fecker in the hope he won’t piss about and lose the ball just outside our box 20 times and actually does something constructive. After all, he has to show Zidane that he hasn’t totally evolved into the Djemba twins
If they foul us, and there is a high chance they go for this route, we need to come up with solutions.They are a poor side. They absolutely leak goals. We should be proactive not reactive. Who cares what Leeds are going to do? We have better players then them.
It's similar to the CL, no? That itself is not the end of the world.Apparently we can now put 9 players on the bench.
This is making football more and more boring as it's easier. Choosing subs well pre-game is no longer part of the challenge, as does lowering down the value of having utility player. No more John O'Shea then.
At least people bitching on which players picked on the bench will be less common so less toxic...?
Apparently we can now put 9 players on the bench.
This is making football more and more boring as it's easier. Choosing subs well pre-game is no longer part of the challenge, as does lowering down the value of having utility player. No more John O'Shea then.
At least people bitching on which players picked on the bench will be less common so less toxic...?
Anthony Taylor