I found all these calls for Pellistri to start strange. People seem to wishful think that playing Pellistri some more would somehow make their theory works. Where as they just ignore evidence that even when Pellistri might go outside, but he rarely burned defenders so as to have space and time to provide service. Does he look like he can cross the ball? I feel he's scared to even attempt a cross. Just keep leaving for Dalot, or a midfielder to cross with lay off. Almost producing nothing.
It's similar with the Weghorst hype last season. People create an illusion about Weghorst is fine beside his finishing. In reality, he's meh in his general play too. Bigging Weghorst up to beat on Martial for example, only for the latter still somewhat had better cameos/attacking display in the same time period since Weghorst joined.
Antony has been bad, but he still had moments. For example: in this latest game he played a inswinging cross toward far post that Rashford squared across the goal, and Hojlund marginally failed to connect for a tap in. Some shite off target, and tame shots that Pellistri doesn't to even attempt. And we're comparing to the worst Antony form so far.
Drop Antony, but play Mount, Hannibal Eriksen on right wing or something. This is a must win game. Not changing from shite throwing at the wall to pissing at the wall with Pellistri who shown nothing with the chances undeservedly thrown his way.