Hammondo
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
- Messages
- 8,563
That would have killed our game completely, no pace aside from rashford.Pogba shoulda started in place of James.
That would have killed our game completely, no pace aside from rashford.Pogba shoulda started in place of James.
What options are better though really? Aside from the back 4 I think this is the best we could do.He was good against Brightons rotated team and against Newcastle. Chelsea is more than a few levels above that, and for years Mata has shown he can't cut it in those games now.
James as well. Its a dumb lineup to start them when you have the options we do. These should be left exclusively for the easy games.
I think I might be the only person on the Caf that doesn’t mind James.
They aren't great. They are far better than Brightons backups or Newcastle though. Those games it is fine to play Mata and Dan James. Not these!This Chelsea side ain't all that great, keep Werner quiet and they are a dud imo.
where did you pull this one from?
Sorry guys, no Alex Telles against a team that CANNOT DEFEND CROSSES?
Ffs.
The PSG lineup and tactics were spot on (I said so before the game), this lineup is a demonstration of the abject failure of the summer window, so hopefully his tactics are spot on againAs has been pointed out, the line up against PSG was simialrly slated. Let's see how the game turns out eh? Gotta trust the manager and team have a plan here.
I agree, he has been great. But I don't think this is the game for him. But let's see.Mata has been great in every game hes played so far.
Bench is better than the team.
You should see my bling. .Congrats to you for not being a newbie. I hope the salary is worth it!
Greenwood is 2 footed, Telles played very well there as well in the week.
How? We have Pogba, Van de Beek, Greenwood on the bench. Telles not in the squad. Going to a 352 would be far better than using one of Mata or James, against Newcastle. Its just asking for trouble, what, because 2 players we know aren't good enough put in acceptable performances against relegation standard teams? We didn't even control the Newcastle game until James came off ffs.What options are better though really? Aside from the back 4 I think this is the best we could do.
It makes sense from a tactical perspective and they're in good form, I'm just a little concerned about them burning out. Ole has a habit overplaying his current favourite players as we saw at the tail end of last season.
And James ahead of Greenwood (who is apparently over his injury) is a strange choice.
When was the last time he played in one of them?Chelsea is more than a few levels above that, and for years Mata has shown he can't cut it in those games now.
As opposed to James' useless pace.That would have killed our game completely, no pace aside from rashford.
Don't need negativity right now. Ride the wave of the high.James shouldn't be at the club. I don't hate the lad, but he's just not cut out for it. Same as I wouldn't want Usain Bolt on the team, though I like him.
ps: The rivers near me are rather cold at this time of year. If anybody knows of a high quality one to visit, could they let me know.
The PSG lineup and tactics were spot on (I said so before the game), this lineup is a demonstration of the abject failure of the summer window, so hopefully his tactics are spot on again
My dear fellow, it is grand of you to show this sort of concern for a stranger on the internet! You will be overjoyed to know that all is indeed well with my nether regions.looks like you got some issues below the belt..good luck with that and enjoy the game.
I agree with Greenwood but the other 2 have not proven themselves at all. I do not think we want to be so defensive and play a 3-5-2, I think we want more balance. The back 4 are a worry but the rest are fine.How? We have Pogba, Van de Beek, Greenwood on the bench. Telles not in the squad. Going to a 352 would be far better than using one of Mata or James, against Newcastle. Its just asking for trouble, what, because 2 players we know aren't good enough put in acceptable performances against relegation standard teams? We didn't even control the Newcastle game until James came off ffs.
That’s fair, although I’d say he did a bit better against Newcastle than he did toward the back end of last season when Ole kept sticking with him. It’s throwing it down right now so maybe he’s just thinking he’ll be able to use his pace to get away from defenders.Nothing against James. He's just not been cutting it recently.
James is going to score today, I can feel it now. The caf is always wrong.
It is possible. It is a bit intense and so he might be unable to get into the game properly. Let's see what Oles plan is.I agree, he has been great. But I don't think this is the game for him. But let's see.
No telles is interesting simply because he has a very good cross on him that could cause problems against a Chelsea defence that cannot really defend.
Hes not a good player, but pace is important. I would 100 percent agree with Greenwood over James though. Honestly Pogba doesn't give much in a central position, putting him wide is only going to make him worse and provide endless excuses for him.As opposed to James' useless pace.
Not sure, probably because we realized for a time that he shouldn't be used unless its against lower opposition where he'll have time on the ball after repeated poor performances against any non shit team?When was the last time he played in one of them?
Martin Atkinson