Can this word be used to describe enormous male appendages?Foul or not, conceding there is recockulous.
Can this word be used to describe enormous male appendages?Foul or not, conceding there is recockulous.
How? He kicks his foot and gets none of the ball; it's blatant foul!I'll admit it's soft.
I'll admit it's soft.
Exactly my thoughts, good choice for once to go downIf Dalot doesn't stay down that would never be reviewed by the VAR
It was the clearest of fouls, but you're still right. No way do we get that if Dalot doesn't sell itIf Dalot doesn't stay down that would never be reviewed by the VAR
100%. Would love him to be playing better but he isn't. Collyer has energy...Need to hook Mainoo, please, I don't want to have this agenda, but he's done literally nothing.
Nah it's not a rule per se but yeah, they seldom go against itThe ref was sent to check the foul by var. He didn't give us shit initially. Rules of VAR is it always trumps the refs on field decision.
Yep. We are abysmal in that aspect, always static.If you don’t run you don’t play. Goes for Mainoo as well as Rashford before him in my opinion. Work, work!!
It's a kick, doesn't matter if it influence the direction of the ball what are you talking about?Lucky there. I don't think that's a foul tbh. Yoro had already hit the ball before the minor contact so it's not even like thr small amount of contact influenced the direction of the ball
Who didn't give a blatant foul in the first place?Can the boring tinfoil hat lot now shit the feck up about corrupt refs being against us? It's annoying reading that RAWK shit
Commentators are sickening
It feels like the right call - there’s no ‘feels’ about it. It was the right call.
Just let off with one there - not at all. It was a foul
Mediocre performance.Can't watch, how are we playing?
his footSoft? He clearly kicks his leg.
Peter Bankes