Spurs
Go feck yourself.
Loan fee of £20m and 100% wage coverage. And that's just the offer to start discussions.
Marcus Rashford (out) | signs for Villa on loan
- Thread starter Mainoonited
- Start date
- Status
Loan fee of £20m and 100% wage coverage. And that's just the offer to start discussions.
Rashford is the ultimate white elephant gift to Levy. We missed the boat when they wanted Martial from us.
Would be a classic United signing, buy an ageing declining player then bemoan why he was bought in the first place after he starts stinking up the place a year into the mega contract.
well, If he had to go to a club in England then I would prefer he went to one like Spurs that would never win anything.
Except Son isn’t declining is he? I wouldn’t have said he is anyway.
He's 32 years old. 33 come the summer. That's not someone you want to be signing.
Spurs
Go feck yourself.
Why not that’s arguably a good place for us to move him on.
I’d take Kulusevski or Maddison though. Maybe even VDV?
No PL teams.
Wouldn't bother me in the slightest.
Even if we get Son in return for Rashford, Son at 32 is still by far a much better player than Rashford at 27.
Kulusevski is probably the one I'd take. Not that it's happening in a million years.
I'd easily take Kulusevski, VDV is way too injury prone.
It’s Spurs…
Van de Vaart is not a Spurs player anymore.
Jokes aside, would love Bergvall or Gray. Top talents the both of them.
Dude it’s rashford. He would make them worse
Levy is shameless
Whatever we think of Rashford, you don’t cut Levy a nice deal.
Whatever we think of Rashford, you don’t cut Levy a nice deal.
Nope, he will have a renaissance and show us what we are missing. He would be uber motivated to succeed in the PL. Plus we’ll forever have to listen to gushing over him in the media, and stupid united fecked up again and sold their best players etc. send him abroad - out of sight, out of mind.
Spurs
Go feck yourself.
Wheeler on a roll
Even if he does, which is a big if, it will only be for 2 months every 3 seasons, so it's fine. Sabotaging them for the rest of that time is a good deal. I don't care where he goes, just that he goes.
Spurs
Go feck yourself.
The real question is are they willing to include an obligation to buy.
As bad as Rashford has been, he does have 2 PL seasons with 17 goals. To get him on a short term loan without any commitment will be a low risk gamble with the potential for a high reward.
Yeah, he's been shit for us for a while but he is still a unique player who if he's happy and in good surroundings, can instantly be one of the best players on his team. Especially given all the 2nd tier teams are looking at him, it's less pressure and if he goes to Bundesliga or Serie A, I'd definitely expect him to tear it up a bit. He just needs to get away from Manchester as a city and get a fresh start I think.
It seems sensible to let him go somewhere on loan where he'll start a lot of games and hopefully get some goals.
Then we can move him on for a decent fee in the summer.
He shouldn't be reintegrated as we know the history with Rashford and what happens next.
Then we can move him on for a decent fee in the summer.
He shouldn't be reintegrated as we know the history with Rashford and what happens next.
Agreed. When you factor in the money for Sancho, Casemiro, potentially Zirkzee and maybe some others, we should have capacity to spend some decent money in the summer.
Pass me the bong mate
I wonder if he will make a U turn if he is still here near the end of season as we get better and better. I mean even when he was at his best the only club that seemed to be interested in him and had the money was PSG (to replace Mbappe). But thats no longer the case.
In European football if that’s the best deal we can do for a soon to be past it Son that’s pretty pathetic. There are plenty of players we could do a swap deal for that represent better value and actually a good opportunity to get a long term deal over the line for said players.
Spurs would be a good move on loan. He will put up ridiculous numbers in their attacking team. Sets us up nicely to then get a big fee for him in the summer.
Those statements are PR bollocks. If he got back in the team he'd do the same thing he's always done, lounge around the pitch putting no effort in. He's done here, simple as that, and the sooner lazy players that put no effort in are gone from this club the better.
We dont know what he meant by that, maybe motivated to order more uber eats. Slowly approaching Ando level of fitness
In fact I would encourage it.
Spurs
Go feck yourself.
Oh we should push him to them. He's never worth it for them, probably more of a hindrance.
Spurs
Go feck yourself.
Him and Spurs are a match made in heaven.
I wouldn't loan him to Spurs he'll likely be crap there
we need an easy loan so he can rack up the goals and then con someone into buying him in the summer
we need an easy loan so he can rack up the goals and then con someone into buying him in the summer
on paper. which is presumably why we pay them as much as we do. not on the field though. Our top earners (reportedly and from memory) over the last 5-6 years have been - Rashford, Sancho, Ronaldo, Casemiro, Varane, De Gea, Cavani. The ROI just simply isn't there even on an individual level.
Nor to has-beens. You simply can't give a mid-30s injury prone Varane, and a clearly-past-his-peak Casemiro 350k or whatever absurd shit we agreed to pay them.
Bruno is a good example of good contract management. We started him on 70k a week(!) and then he showed us why he's worth 200k and we gave him that. He continues to sweat for the badge. That's what we need to do more of.
Sancho really pisses me off. Arguably someone who should've come in at their peak but just bombed.
Sorry about that.
- Status