Alex99
Rehab's Pete Doherty
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 16,464
He's said he's off a few times but keeps coming back for more. I'm just too alluring.You could cut the sexual tension in here with a knife.
He's said he's off a few times but keeps coming back for more. I'm just too alluring.You could cut the sexual tension in here with a knife.
Tells others they don't know the law and they're wrong.Apart from the fact your interpretation is wrong, just to end your argument, he does move towards the ball… have you seen the replay?
Only in the loosest possible sense. He moves slightly to his left. Take away Dumfries and it's still a goal. He's not prevented anything as far as I'm concerned . As I said earlier, I can see why it's given but it's soft, imo.Apart from the fact your interpretation is wrong, just to end your argument, he does move towards the ball… have you seen the replay?
So he moves then?Only in the loosest possible sense. He moves slightly to his left. Take away Dumfries and it's still a goal. He's not prevented anything as far as I'm concerned . As I said earlier, I can see why it's given but it's soft, imo.
Horrible decision. The defender got nowhere near the ball.Stonewall pen.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Good fecking grief. Automatic red card for such ridiculous play acting.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The sensor in the ball is used to determine exact moment ball was played for the semi-automated offsides. The secondary use is confirming contact for decisions such as that.A fecking snickometer.
in football
feck off
Just makes no sense to follow the sport when it’s decisions like this that decides game. A toenail offside and a penalty from a cross that was blasted to an arm from two yards. And that’s why Germany will proceed instead of us. No reason to keep watching.
It should go back to handballs never being given unless extremely blatant. Also toenail offsides are fecking shit but that's another story.
Ok. Some sense thenThe sensor in the ball is used to determine exact moment ball was played for the semi-automated offsides. The secondary use is confirming contact for decisions such as that.
That’s because the purpose of offside is to stop players goal-hanging, not to try and disallow goals because of a few (debatable) centimetres here and there. Nobody complains about these fine margins when we’re dealing with a ball crossing the goal line, which really is comparable to the cricket scenarios you mention. This insane nit-picking about offsides goes completely against the spirit of the rule it’s supposed to enforce.Toe nail offside is still an offside. Just like in cricket a toe nail run out is still a run out. Can't believe people argue this ridiculous points. Most cricket games are decided by such decisions, LBWs, run outs, catches. If its over the line its over the line.
She explains why our game is being ruined very wellThis American woman on itv is great. I bet the refs absolutely love her.
She’s brilliant! If the Premier League had any sense they’d be trying to hire her ASAP!This American woman on itv is great. I bet the refs absolutely love her.
Just said same on the match thread… the decisions are bollocks but she explains each part of the rule/the interpretation really clearly.This American woman on itv is great. I bet the refs absolutely love her.
Her explanations of the rules of the game and applying it to the action are first class. She does it unerringly without a hint of hesitation or stuttering. As she alluded to at the end there, these aren't her opinions and she probably thinks the handball is a load of shite too, but those are the rules.This American woman on itv is great. I bet the refs absolutely love her.
Long and short of it is John Terry took the piss and we all have to suffer because the administrators in charge went too far in trying to stop that sort of cheatingJust said same on the match thread… the decisions are bollocks but she explains each part of the rule/the interpretation really clearly.
Its not the technology, it’s the morons who come up with the rules and the morons who officiate it
Feck off with this pretentious crap. The offside rule was created so that players don't hang around behind the defensive line and wait for the ball to be lobbed to them turning the game into a tennis match. It was not created for microscopic "offside" positions that offer no one any advantage. Positions that a human being can't even tell at a glance, so you need some uber-duper special system to measure it. Because a human can't. That's what's actually ridiculous.Toe nail offside is still an offside. Just like in cricket a toe nail run out is still a run out. Can't believe people argue this ridiculous points. Most cricket games are decided by such decisions, LBWs, run outs, catches. If its over the line its over the line.
Long and short of it is John Terry took the piss and we all have to suffer because the administrators in charge went too far in trying to stop that sort of cheating