Declan Rice | signs for arsenal

Status
Not open for further replies.

CannonBalls

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
449
Supports
Arsenal
Great news for the Arsenal fans in here, the ones who were absolutely certain he was joining almost had egg on their face :lol:

To be fair I think it's a great signing, Arsenal don't need a lot, they need depth and Rice will relegate Xhaka to the bench and add quality/depth.

Havertz and probably Timber too, they gotta be up there again next season surely? That's the pressure they have to get used to.
Think the plan is Havertz replaces Xhakha and Rice would start over Partey. Rice is very important for the Rice - Havertz - Odegaard midfield to work. And Zinchenko - Timber/White will help in the buildup phase
 

LordSpud

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
2,587


City left the party. Worth a cheeky Murtough Madness bid?
 

GoonerGirly

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
1,035
Supports
Arsenal
Thank God, perhaps we can finally move on. If City won't be coming in with another bid, West Ham will have to take our offer instead of squabbling over the payment structure.
 

Orange Tree

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
2,148
Please buy Maguire with some of that money. We'll throw in discounts on McTominay and VDB too.
 

roonster09

FA Cup Predictions 2023/2024 winner
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
37,061
Brexit-Arsenal?

Remember the shit ManUtd got for signing 2 english players, wonder when they will be called Brexit London club.
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,204


City left the party. Worth a cheeky Murtough Madness bid?
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
16,031
Location
Salford
Forgetting the fee and looking surely at the signing, I think this is an excellent signing for Arsenal.

I would have loved United to get him. But given that Arsenal are (surely) spending their whole transfer budget on him shows how important he will be to them. I don't think United could build a team around him.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,781
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Arsenal are spending a shit ton yet again but it barely gets dwelled upon by the press.
There should be more about the money spent on Havertz, but it's hardly a surprise that the press aren't mocking or questioning Arsenal when they're signing one of the counties best midfielders.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,802
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
I´m sure most clubs work like that, no?
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,396
Supports
Chelsea
Arsenal are spending a shit ton yet again but it barely gets dwelled upon by the press.
Weird, right? They always seem to avoid scrutiny about their massive spending whilst Chelsea/City/United don’t.

I think that should change now, though. Perhaps it’s because they never really went above ~£50m for any one player except for Pepe. Now they’ve joined the rest of the big PL clubs and are spending mega money on players.
 

spe88

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 24, 2017
Messages
131
Location
Warrington
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
Agree, although I’m sure we’d see a different stance if they were 2nd, 3rd or 4th.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,197
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Fair point. Though West Ham do have the option to extend Rice’s by a year.
Which they'll probably exercise but Chelsea's owner being stupid doesn't mean the entire market has to follow. Rice isn't worth more than £40m, not for a player in his position that does what he does. These evaluations are crazy for a player that's available for sale.
 

GoonerGirly

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
1,035
Supports
Arsenal
Forgetting the fee and looking surely at the signing, I think this is an excellent signing for Arsenal.

I would have loved United to get him. But given that Arsenal are (surely) spending their whole transfer budget on him shows how important he will be to them. I don't think United could build a team around him.
If the rumours are to be believed, Arteta has about £200mil to spend this summer, £165 mil of which he'd already have spent on Rice and Havertz. We're supposedly in advanced talks for Timber too (at about £40mil mark) so that will probably be that, unless we make any significant sales (eg Balogun could go for about £30mil).
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,204
I´m sure most clubs work like that, no?
I think I praise them more because they have a lot of money to spend if they wanted to. I cant think of many transfers were they over spent or over paid. Remember they were in for Sanchez with us, even VVD they thought it was too expensive (incorrectly in hindsight)
 

Crimson King

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
3,312
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
It's a lot easier when you're already top of the pile. They spent silly money on certain players at times to claw their way there.

Now that they're there and so dominant they can afford to be more circumspect. They don't actually need Rice at all, I honestly don't see how he's any better than what they already have. They can just wait until the next big prospect pops up.

If they desperately needed Rice they'd blow Arsenal out of the water.
 

GoonerGirly

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
1,035
Supports
Arsenal
Which they'll probably exercise but Chelsea's owner being stupid doesn't mean the entire market has to follow. Rice isn't worth more than £40m, not for a player in his position that does what he does. These evaluations are crazy for a player that's available for sale.
There is no way Rice - who is probably future England captain - would go for £40mil in today's market.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,723
Think the plan is Havertz replaces Xhakha and Rice would start over Partey. Rice is very important for the Rice - Havertz - Odegaard midfield to work. And Zinchenko - Timber/White will help in the buildup phase
Ah okay! That's a decent lineup to be fair, with some solid depth.
 

RedC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
5,830
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
They literally have 2 top 4 level players for every position, they don't need to do that. When they really need someone, the transfer is magically so easy...
 

dwd

Saturday Night Spies
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
16,391
Location
Under soil heating.
Weird, right? They always seem to avoid scrutiny about their massive spending whilst Chelsea/City/United don’t.

I think that should change now, though. Perhaps it’s because they never really went above ~£50m for any one player except for Pepe. Now they’ve joined the rest of the big PL clubs and are spending mega money on players.
It's extremely weird, I can't explain it.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,781
Location
Where the grass is greener.
:lol: How is Rice a future England captain? And if that's the only thing pushing up his value then there's major issues with that valuation of over £100m
How isn't he? Who would you say is likely instead. It looks like a forgone conclusion to me. The price for him is mad, but it's far from a surprise, and big money has been spent on worse.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I hate how well run City are in terms of transfers. For all the money they have, they are never involved in silly bidding wars. They offer what they think is best and if its not accepted they move on.
They move on when the player tells them they don’t want to join City.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,197
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
How isn't he? Who would you say is likely instead. It looks like a forgone conclusion to me. The price for him is mad, but it's far from a surprise, and big money has been spent on worse.
I'd be willing to bet a great deal of money that the future England captain is Bellingham, if not him then John Stones. Rice will be in and out of the England squad over his entire career so I doubt he'll ever be regular enough to be captain.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,199
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
He's a good player but in a normal transfer market he'd be worth probably half what they're paying. It's crazy money - which doesn't ultimately matter with regards to him (I've always found it strange when players are held up against their transfer fees), but more the impact on their summer budget when they really need strengthening in several positions.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,802
I think I praise them more because they have a lot of money to spend if they wanted to. I cant think of many transfers were they over spent or over paid. Remember they were in for Sanchez with us, even VVD they thought it was too expensive (incorrectly in hindsight)
Yeah, that is fair, they seem very sensible most times.
Even tough i think it is hard to be too impressed since there is so much smoke about breaking rules and payments on the side and what not.
 

GoonerGirly

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
1,035
Supports
Arsenal
:lol: How is Rice a future England captain? And if that's the only thing pushing up his value then there's major issues with that valuation of over £100m
According to Southgate, he is in the conversation. He is captain of West Ham currently.
https://www.caughtoffside.com/2023/03/08/gareth-southgate-considering-major-declan-rice-decision/

Of course it's not the only thing pushing the price up - he's English, of perfect age (24 with his best years ahead of him), already an experienced international and proven in the PL. He is one of the best midfielders in the league. I think his fair valuation in today's market would be £60-70mil mark. We are overpaying, there's no doubt about it and we've given our "take it or leave it" offer. But Arteta seems desperate for him and sees him as a leader to build the team around.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,723
I'd be willing to bet a great deal of money that the future England captain is Bellingham, if not him then John Stones. Rice will be in and out of the England squad over his entire career so I doubt he'll ever be regular enough to be captain.
In and out? Who pushes him out of central midfield?

Surely Bellingham and Rice is the midfield partnership long term (maybe with a 3rd player in there).
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
:lol: How is Rice a future England captain? And if that's the only thing pushing up his value then there's major issues with that valuation of over £100m
If Caceido after a single full season costs more than 85 million then what’s so surprising about Rice costing above that when this is his 3rd good season when he outcome the Fans Caceido’s of the previous season such as Ndidi, Ndombele & the Brighton lad Bissouma?

Rice isn’t worth 100 mil but no one is - not even Caceido at a few million less.
 

RaddyRed

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
1,223
Location
Manchester
Supports
Henrik Larsson
I'd be willing to bet a great deal of money that the future England captain is Bellingham, if not him then John Stones. Rice will be in and out of the England squad over his entire career so I doubt he'll ever be regular enough to be captain.
Since being eligible for England has Rice ever been left out of the England squad?
 

cesc's_mullet

Get a haircut Hippy!
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Messages
27,067
Supports
Arsenal
Great news for the Arsenal fans in here, the ones who were absolutely certain he was joining almost had egg on their face :lol:

To be fair I think it's a great signing, Arsenal don't need a lot, they need depth and Rice will relegate Xhaka to the bench and add quality/depth.

Havertz and probably Timber too, they gotta be up there again next season surely? That's the pressure they have to get used to.
Great signing for sure if we sort out these supposed finer details - one of the best midfielders in the league, perfect age (peak ahead of him), British, a leader. It's still mad money though.

If we pull this off, along with Timber and Havertz (plus another midfielder if Partey takes the Saudi money, and who could blame him?) then we definitely cannot be upset with how the KSE group have supported Arteta. We have had significant investment over the last few years.

I've come around completely with the Kreonke's. Being (simply coincidentally) a long time fan of the Denver Nuggets I have been lumped with them for years. But listening to Josh in particular over the last few years has given me confidence in their vision.

Now they're running hot with the LA Rams, Denver Avalanche and Denver Nuggets all winning their respective championships over the last 18 months. I think it shows that either they're lucky or are running their clubs the right way over the last few years (yes I acknowledge that they threw everything at the NFL Championship and will probably be paying for it for years, but they won, so it paid off).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.