pascell
Full Member
Think I read its £70m + £6.7m in add ons.Depends on the addons but if they are reasonable we should snap their hand off.
Think I read its £70m + £6.7m in add ons.Depends on the addons but if they are reasonable we should snap their hand off.
That'll definitely be accepted if it is £70m upfront, as suggested elsewhere. The £6.7m add on's then gets us all our money back.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bayern bound isn’t he?I'd personally love Timo Werner.
Is DM in his handle Daily Mail? Is that guy any reliable.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Simon Stone has tweeted also. Looks like it’s real.Is DM in his handle Daily Mail? Is that guy any reliable.
If true, get it the feck done. Not gonna get better than 70m + for Lukaku.
Transparent as feck.Another guy that needs a new contract?
What? No, he played on the right a whopping 3 times in 40 matches last year. He's a striker and not even a very good one.Praying that this is true
Inaki has been one of the best kept talents in Spain the last few years. He would instantly solve the black hole known as our right flank in attack
Yeah. He’s one of the usual journalists that covers United along with Stone, Peach, McDonell, Luckhurst etcIs DM in his handle Daily Mail? Is that guy any reliable.
If true, get it the feck done. Not gonna get better than 70m + for Lukaku.
I’m talking about the quoted price, to be honest. He’s the only one who put a figure out from what I can see. Which means he either has a good source or he’s pulling it out of his arse.Simon Stone has tweeted also. Looks like it’s real.
Well they offered something like £68 Million last time so it has to be more.I’m talking about the quoted price, to be honest. He’s the only one who put a figure from what I can see. Which means he either has a good source or he’s pulling it out of his arse.
I assume this is "Now", and couldn't agree more. I wonder if there really will be another incoming if Lukaku is sold.No spend that money on a decent CF or CM!
Yep.The bonus is they take him off our hands
That makes no sense.Longstaff - 35m
Ben Yedder - 35m
no? too much sense?
Would cost moreLongstaff - 35m
Ben Yedder - 35m
no? too much sense?
What did it say?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That will never be mentioned though.If Lukaku to Inter materializes, then there's a real possibility of United net spend being lower than City, Arsenal, Spurs, Wolves and Everton this summer.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Deleted?
Was just about Inter bidding for Lukaku.What did it say?
I can assure you it will be once Lukaku goes, especially after @Wumminator created a thread on here about how we've spent everyone this summer. City, Arsenal and Wolves are already ahead in that scenario. If Lo Celso moves to Spurs and Everton sign Zaha, they also leapfrog us.That will never be mentioned though.
You and me both, brother.Transfer wasn't the first thought that came into my head seeing that image.
Yep. Happy with that.Great deal for us
Cya Lukaku you fecking disappointment.
Too much? No, too little.Longstaff - 35m
Ben Yedder - 35m
no? too much sense?
40m plus 10 in add ons so. we desperately need reinforcements in midfield and attack. spend the lukaku money! 35m for Ben yedder is better than 80m for inakI williams.Would cost more
I reckon that will be acceptable.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Ben Yedder supposedly has a35 million release clause.Too much? No, too little.
Ben Yedder only had one season good enough for the desired level, and he’s 29. Newcastle asked for 50 for Longstaff. Not sure why you think they’d sell for 35 with 3 days of the window remaining
snap call!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date