Why would Arsenal accept 20m deal from City when they can get 25m + Mkhytaryan? If I'm Arsenal I will accept the United offer and tell City to increase the bid. 20m is nothing in today's market, what 20m can give you in January windows anyway? They would rather keep him, let him go for free and play him to help the club to get top 4 or win Europa League for CL spot. Sanchez has start 17 league games this season and scored 7 league goals & 3 assists. With that number of stats, are you telling me Arsenal thinks he's the cancer in dressing room? They still relied on him and Sanchez still gave his contribution. So if I'm Arsenal I keep him for 6 month rather than sell him for just 20m.
If City wants him they should have increase the bid, the money shouldn't be an issue here. Remember, City was willing to spend 60m fee last summer and paid 290k per week but Arsenal wanted 70m. I don't know exactly what's going on here but I won't be surprised if Sanchez is actually disappointed with the way how City isn't taking this seriously.
I disagree with if you're an attacking player you'd to sign for Guardiola, what about Zlatan & Eto'o. They prefer to play for Mourinho rather than Pep. Mourinho is a world class manager who has won many trophies like league title & champions league, why wouldn't attacker want to play for him?
Carragher didn't make any sense to me because he's giving a statement with no proof which sounds so biased, it's like he wanted to say that no top attackers would choose United over City & no top attackers would choose Mourinho over Pep. Gary is actually not making statement with no proof, he's actually questioning Manchester City here.
FFS!! Manchester United is still a giant club, most successful club in England, bigger than City & has showing progress in the plan & project to win trophies. Mourinho is still a world class manager just like Pep.