RedTillI'mDead
A Key Tool
Ok Sharpe, fine, but Blomqvist? He doesn't belong in the discussion at all.
I thought exact same thing! Blomqvist is almost a nobody in United history
He only had one season with us.
Ok Sharpe, fine, but Blomqvist? He doesn't belong in the discussion at all.
I thought exact same thing! Blomqvist is almost a nobody in United history
He only had one season with us.
He played 38 games (25 in the Prem) , scored 1 goal in the Prem and no other goals. He 7 assists, 5 in the league.A pretty decent season though wasn't it?
A peak Nani would have been perfect for any side. He was a world-class player at his best. Too bad Fergie mismanaged him. Should have had an even better time here than he did with the talent he had.A peak Nani would've been perfect for our right side  Exactly what we are missing. 
A peak Nani would have been perfect for any side. He was a world-class player at his best. Too bad Fergie mismanaged him. Should have had an even better time here than he did with the talent he had.
Yep. He was infuriating.Jesus, people are revisionistic. When he was here, he was yelled at all the time for being highly inconsistent. Now people are reminiscing about how a peak Nani would save everything and how Fergie mismanaged him.
'Member Nani? I member.
Edit: By the way, I do think he had his great-heights and definitely a legend at the club - but his consistency even at peak Nani would still leave us swearing and considering buying another right winger.
He was definitely inconsistent but on his day he was unplayable.Jesus, people are revisionistic. When he was here, he was yelled at all the time for being highly inconsistent. Now people are reminiscing about how a peak Nani would save everything and how Fergie mismanaged him.
'Member Nani? I member.
Me too. But that is not a fair description of Nani's time at United.I'll take a consistent 7/10 over a regular 3/10 with the occasional 8.
It's not the choice though, is it?I'll take a consistent 7/10 over a regular 3/10 with the occasional 8.
Jesus, people are revisionistic. When he was here, he was yelled at all the time for being highly inconsistent. Now people are reminiscing about how a peak Nani would save everything and how Fergie mismanaged him.
'Member Nani? I member.
Edit: By the way, I do think he had his great-heights and definitely a legend at the club - but his consistency even at peak Nani would still leave us swearing and considering buying another right winger.
He made 10 assists and three goals in the Premier League in 09/10, as well as five assists and two goals in the Champions League.He had one good season with us. Maybe one and a half. The rest of the time he was infuriatingly inconsistent.
As I said, he had one good season. Your stats back that up. One out of what, seven? A testament to his inconsistency. We had a genuine world class winger. Ronaldo. He went to Real Madrid for a world record fee. Nani went to Fenerbahce. Says it all.He made 10 assists and three goals in the Premier League in 09/10, as well as five assists and two goals in the Champions League.
He made 19 assists in the league in 10/11.
He made 12 assists and scored eight goals in the league in 11/12.
Then he got his injury, and after that he started just 14 league games for us.
The numbers speak for themselves. After a few years to bed in he became one of the best wingers in the league and consistently produced the numbers. People just remember him as frustrating because he conceded possession quite a lot, which is bound to happen when you have the burden of being the main creative outlet.
Excuse me? Which two of those three seasons were not good?As I said, he had one good season. Your stats back that up.
9/10 and 11/12 were okay. 10/11 was good.Excuse me? Which two of those three seasons were not good?
Okay. If you don't think 12 assists and eight goals is a good season for a winger, then Valencia never had a good season for us. Neither did Giggs since 2000 which is as far back as Transfermarkt's stats go.9/10 and 11/12 were okay. 10/11 was good.
Luckily I don't exclusively use stats in order to rate a player. I watch them play. Even if I agreed with you that he had three good seasons, which I don't, you're left with a player who has performed less than half the time he was with us.Okay. If you don't think 12 assists and eight goals is a good season for a winger, then Valencia never had a good season for us. Neither did Giggs since 2000 which is as far back as Transfermarkt's stats go.
Okay. If you don't think 12 assists and eight goals is a good season for a winger, then Valencia never had a good season for us. Neither did Giggs since 2000 which is as far back as Transfermarkt's stats go.
'Contributions' like this certainly aren't.No point in arguing it mate, some of the rubbish on here isn't even worth the time.
9/10 and 11/12 were okay. 10/11 was good.
He was with us from 2007 to 2015 (the last year being a loan). Do you think that's good enough?I think he was excellent for two calendar years, 2010 and 2011.
He's semi retirement since he left Man. United hasn't he?
Was awful for Valencia last season (a difficult time for the club admittedly) and every time I've seen Lazio this season he's always on the bench.
Does well at international level but he's under-achieved at club level last 5 years unless someone can fill me in with all his achievements.
He's been a bit crap for Portugal too bar a couple of games at the Euros. Definitely won't be starting at the World Cup and I'm not sure he'll even go.
He's actually still an ok player but he barely plays due to injuries.
He was with us from 2007 to 2015 (the last year being a loan). Do you think that's good enough?
The criticism directed at Nani is that he was inconsistent. My argument was that whenever he was played consistently, he consistently delivered. The numbers certainly back that up. Apart from the three seasons mentioned he also had eight assists and three goals in 26 league games in his first season, which I'd call a very impressive debut season for a 21-year-old.Luckily I don't exclusively use stats in order to rate a player. I watch them play. Even if I agreed with you that he had three good seasons, which I don't, you're left with a player who has performed less than half the time he was with us.
Portugal will call if he can walk I'm sure.
It will be odd seeing Portugal at a major tournament one day without any of Ronaldo, Nani or Quaresema in their squad. Think you have to back to Euro 2000 as Quaresma was in the 2002 squad I think as a youngster.
He was with us from 2007 to 2015 (the last year being a loan). Do you think that's good enough?
Actually Quaresma's first tournament for us was Euro 2008 where he only played one match and he only played in two tournaments for us, Euro 2008 and Euro 2016 which is a bit weird since he has so many caps for us. He'll be in his first World Cup next season at 34.
I'm not as sure as you that Nani wil go to Russia in the summer. Bernardo Silva, Quaresma, Gelson and Guedes will all go if fit so that doesn't leave much room.