Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,847
Can’t help but find it a bit underwhelming
And I don’t even have a logical reason
No idea why. Would be a cracking signing. Still only 22 too.
Can’t help but find it a bit underwhelming
And I don’t even have a logical reason
Can’t help but find it a bit underwhelming
And I don’t even have a logical reason
Get him in, he's a more accomplished player than Longstaff.
What has he accomplished?
I remember the last World Cup he played against the England ‘s midfield and dictated the game with ease. We desperately need players who can control the game.
OGS had mentioned this numerous time, we need to be able to hold on to the ball better but we don’t have the midfielders to do this currently.
Even though we spend over 200 million on the midfield department.
If we get Longstaff or Tielemans, they would go straight into that midfield and improve us 10 fold.
I had hoped Perrera would have been the player we needed, a player that controls the midfield, but he seems too rash and easily disposed of the ball.
Im not sold on Longstaff. He has very little league experience and could join United and struggle on the big stage like the more talented Pereira is. There's no telling. He could improve United overtime but expectations should be managed, I don't think he'd make an immediate impact
Newcastle’s good form started when Longstaff was at the heart of their midfield. When he got injured they were not the same team as before.
Tieleman would be the less risk purchase, but if we can’t get him I would be intrigued with Longstaff. I am not a big fan of Rice and I don’t think he is the type of player we should go for. We need to look for a player that can dictate the game.
Periera has regressed, playing him as a winger didn’t really help his game at all.
More that he was young, fragile and might not suit the league well. Seems to have done alright thoughThought everyone said he was shite when he went to Leicester
Unfortunately we don’t seem to trust our youth as much. We played Rashford because of LVG and he was stuck by Jose ot he would be crucified.Longstaff is one for the future. Nothing more. If that’s our strategy we might as well just promote Garner.
I could also see Pereira improving quite a bit next season.
Newcastle’s good form started when Longstaff was at the heart of their midfield. When he got injured they were not the same team as before.
Tieleman would be the less risk purchase, but if we can’t get him I would be intrigued with Longstaff. I am not a big fan of Rice and I don’t think he is the type of player we should go for. We need to look for a player that can dictate the game.
Periera has regressed, playing him as a winger didn’t really help his game at all.
I really hope anyone saying Pogba is too inconsistent is not saying we should sign this player.
Agreed. Him and Pogba in the same team is a scary prospect.
Yeah, for our defence
Thought everyone said he was shite when he went to Leicester
Yeah, for our defence
Tielemans is much better at taking care of the ball imo. It entirely depends on the way Ole wants to play. Personally, I think we should try and sign ball players as a matter of priority.Tielemans is a good player, but I think Neves could be better as a playmaker.
If we are going to replace Herrera, then someone like N'Dombele would be ideal IMO.
That’s what I meant.
It wouldn't surprise me if Longstaff has a better season than Tielemans and Neves.
You could be right, and I guess I'm getting carried away, but I really do think there's potentially a top player in the making in him.Honestly I think people are getting carried away with Longstaff.
As we’ve seen before, having the tool(s) doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll perform consitently.
I remember the last World Cup he played against the England ‘s midfield and dictated the game with ease. We desperately need players who can control the game.
OGS had mentioned this numerous time, we need to be able to hold on to the ball better but we don’t have the midfielders to do this currently.
Even though we spend over 200 million on the midfield department.
If we get Longstaff or Tielemans, they would go straight into that midfield and improve us 10 fold.
I had hoped Perrera would have been the player we needed, a player that controls the midfield, but he seems too rash and easily disposed of the ball.
That's not entirely true @Ekeke Tielemans was playing alongside Ndidi for many games before Choudhury was introduced to the team. The Pogba role was occupied by Maddison for the most part. Tielemans has not been an AM for Leicester, he's played a normal CM position.
This is a hype post if ever I saw one.
Ole also lambasted the fitness/workrate of the team and Pereira had the 3rd most sprints of our entire team and around the middle of total distance covered. He also won the ball with interceptions the 5th most out of our team with only Ander being a midfielder to make more. Tackles and interceptions combined Andreas was 3rd behind Ander and Fred and one of our best pressing players.
He was a bit disappointing on the ball I agree with that. Although when he actually got himself into a shooting position he scored our goal of the season so thats obviously more about getting himself into that area so that he can take shots and also being given the chance to take freekicks.
Longstaff doesnt currently do what you're suggesting either. He's another player who has good commitment and ball winning, better than Ander in that department. I dont know Newcastle's running numbers but I do know overall Newcastle were towards the top and it wouldnt be surprising if Longstaff was another player who covered a lot of distance.
Andreas got on the ball and played a lot more passes however. So no Longstaff isnt a player who controls the midfield. He's currently a ball winner.
Tielemans for Leicester last season was a typical attacking midfielder. He was a lot closer to making as many passes as Andreas, but he didnt. Still 4 less on average. He did however show a lot more quality going forward getting himself into dangerous positions. Andreas still played more key passes but Tielemans averaged exactly double the amount of shots per game with 2.4 to Andreas' 1.2 so no surprise he scored 3 goals instead of Andreas' 1. But when it comes to distance covered I doubt he's up there. And he wasnt a good ball winner for Leicester last season, even though he has been a decent ball winner at his previous clubs.
Longstaff is more defensive than Andreas. And Tielemans is more offensive than Andreas. Andreas was more of a hybrid of the two roles and hes obviously older, but with Ole's focus on fitness, pressing and putting in the running Andreas is still very likely to be given chances. And hopefully he'll help control the midfield better, I do agree with that.
But just because we are linked with other players doesnt mean they are automatically better at it. Longstaff isnt and Tielemans might be able to but didnt last season and you'd lose half the defensive work of the other players. He's more of Pogba's role at Leicester
Gonna be massive interst in him, I would love him at Tottenam would be a great Dembele replacment.