I'm rather bored so here's another one describing the thread:
WesBrownIsAGod:
WesBrownIsAGod:
WUMming in the Utd Forum
- Thread starter Feedingseagulls
- Start date
As for windups that go too far, it's like the US Supreme Court said about obscenity: "I know it when I see it".
Nope I only drew the wind up mechanism and the noodle hair, here's Lizardking pissing himself:
Here I only drew the pants and the pee
Please God use the original version of that as LK's avatar. Pleeaaaase. Even without the pants and the piss.
Internet gayness
They Fight, and Bite
They Fight and Fight and Bite
Fight, Fight, Fight, Bite, Bite, Bite
The Itchy and Scratchy Showwwwwww!
They Fight and Fight and Bite
Fight, Fight, Fight, Bite, Bite, Bite
The Itchy and Scratchy Showwwwwww!
i prefer the stingy and battery show.
They bite. And light.
And bite and light and bite...
can someone let feedingseagulls know that mods give out taglines at their own discretion? If he had the ability to change it on his own and noods messed about with it, he might actually have a valid complaint.
FFS you think I put myself up as a self confessed women's pantie wearer?*
this whole business is becoming tedious in the extreme.
* to be fair, I started a thread about it so draw your own conclusions.
FFS you think I put myself up as a self confessed women's pantie wearer?*
this whole business is becoming tedious in the extreme.
* to be fair, I started a thread about it so draw your own conclusions.
He's pissed because noods decided to "win" an argument by changing his tagline.
But yes, it is time to move on. For everyone.
But yes, it is time to move on. For everyone.
I became bored with his attempts to turn a conversation about Owen Hargreaves into a political court case, and his bizarre inconsistencies with doing so.
that was me....i was taking part in the forum olympics in the general....i got an infraction for it
Tee hee. I never even saw a Saha/Lyon thread.
To be fair, he does have a point about you and paper bags, not to mention your great butsecks-love of Our Owen.
You should change his tagline to "noodlehair", and yours to "FeedingSeagulls".
Then we could all move forward holding hands and adding footnotes to our posts on pubes.
Actually you arsehole - you're the one who should be looking at 'what you're doing'!
So a bunch of pillocks who couldn't construct a coherent argument if their lives depended on it get their way...
Listen arsehole...
You're just a 'tag along' pillock, incapable of adding anything concrete to a debate.
So your opinions count for shit. You're a dickhead, with the moral sense of a diseased prawn
Actually - with a few notable exceptions:
feck OFF THE LOT OF YOU!!!!
Wow, just wow.
You're a broken record FS, sort out your insecurities and don't bring them to this forum, that would be my advice.
You have issues.
You're a broken record FS, sort out your insecurities and don't bring them to this forum, that would be my advice.
You have issues.
Man you're starting to kill that joke. I think you may aswell get it tattooed on your chest or something.
I'm sure there was a Viz character like FSG?
That would be the 'bizarre' fact that I was never inconsistent - whilst Noods specialised in inconsistency, dishonesty and cowardice.
Wow, just 'wow'.
Your inability to detect the aptness of those remarks in context speaks volumes.
Not again 
That's it. Mr Logic from Viz.
what thread is he on about? is it a good read?
This is fecking brilliant.
Whoa sorry, I meant utter shit.
Getting a bit confused.
Getting a bit confused.
diseased prawn
diseased prawn
Diseased prawns are never particularly funny.
Eating one in reality will give you food poisoning.
Reading threads polluted by them isn't nice either.
Other posters who like them are seriously deranged.
(Just my opinion like. )There's no need for that many smilies.
Unless you're Carol Smiley.
Unless you're Carol Smiley.
youse are all idiots
Well that was odd.
you and whuaz oarmy like?
Good fun.Plech said:
However, what makes you think I don't like Carrick as a player? - I just think he too has poor games and weaknesses in his play. It's the pillocks defending him by unjustly attacking OH to whom I object.
Here we go again.
I don't really think you do, it was dictated by the set-up with two sides and all that
I assumed so - just wanted to make the point to those afraid of the Carrick v Hargreaves etc. thread.
Here you go...
Supposed to have done that last night but the site was too slow to do so.