Double edged sword. Great for growth of the game financially but loved being able to access so many games for free on YouTube – which probably also helped attract a wider audience than when it was on the FA Player.
I've not seen any official numbers but the Guardian reckons it's worth about £65m across the 5 years. That's up from about £7m/year.Is it a good deal? The WPLL was believed to want between £15-20m last year, but settled on a years extension and they have now done a deal for £13m with Sky. That includes three times more matches, including the WSL Championship and League Cup.
It won't really increase the number of viewers as pointed out, more likely to limit it and plus it will probably follow the EFL format currently on Sky.
Double edged sword. Great for growth of the game financially but loved being able to access so many games for free on YouTube – which probably also helped attract a wider audience than when it was on the FA Player.
I've not seen any official numbers but the Guardian reckons it's worth about £65m across the 5 years. That's up from about £7m/year.
It's thought the 65m is what WSL get directly from Sky and the deal actually costs Sky about 100m because they'll be doing all the outside broadcast work themselves. Including the matches that are going to be on YouTube.
We don't know the full details yet like whether any matches end up free to view on YouTube in the Uk. We know the BBC have basically the same deal as that do at present.
So it's not a bad deal for WSL given that they need some guaranteed income streams.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...tic-five-year-tv-deal-with-sky-sports-and-bbc
I think the most disappointing thing at the moment in the UK is the lack of WCL coverage from free to view broadcasters. The quality of some of those matches is excellent and they deserve to be seen.If it’s between growing the game financially vs getting to watch the games for free, I’m happy to pay for the product. Not sure why football played by women should be free to watch when it’s not when men play.
I think the most disappointing thing at the moment in the UK is the lack of WCL coverage from free to view broadcasters. The quality of some of those matches is excellent and they deserve to be seen.
The annoyance is that DAZN who have a rather feeble app and next to no marketing presence own the rights. They've made it free to view but they're more or less invisible.
I'd love to see big broadcaster start doing a game each match week. Of course, that would be even better if United were playing in it
I think the most disappointing thing at the moment in the UK is the lack of WCL coverage from free to view broadcasters. The quality of some of those matches is excellent and they deserve to be seen.
The annoyance is that DAZN who have a rather feeble app and next to no marketing presence own the rights. They've made it free to view but they're more or less invisible so it doesn't do much of a job for women's club football marketing.
I'd love to see big broadcaster start doing a game each match week. Of course, that would be even better if United were playing in it
Yes I agree. With the place Women's Football is currently it needs as much free to air as possible to continue the momentum. It reminds me of England memorably regaining the Ashes in summer 2005 and that was actually the last ever Test summer that was on free to air so bar the 20/20 final and the odd Test seen nothing in the 20 years since.
Would've thought two matches a week on BBC might have been possible? Also maybe move the highlights show to a more family friendly timeslot. I get the logic in putting it after MOTD2 on a Sunday night but it's finishing well beyond midnight so surely some weeks put it on at 9pm?
Agreed on the cricket as well. Rugby League is the other sport I keep tabs on. It needs the money it can get from Sky, but it also needs the exposure/marketing that it can get from being with a major free to air broadcaster.Yes I agree. With the place Women's Football is currently it needs as much free to air as possible to continue the momentum. It reminds me of England memorably regaining the Ashes in summer 2005 and that was actually the last ever Test summer that was on free to air so bar the 20/20 final and the odd Test seen nothing in the 20 years since.
Would've thought two matches a week on BBC might have been possible? Also maybe move the highlights show to a more family friendly timeslot. I get the logic in putting it after MOTD2 on a Sunday night but it's finishing well beyond midnight so surely some weeks put it on at 9pm?
Still major issues around scheduling of Women's matches and conflicts with Men's - I've not watched much WSL this season as a result
Arsenal Women having sold thousands of tickets for a CL tie at the Emirates and now getting kicked out due to the Carabao Cup!
This has put a downer on the evening. Awful news.
Yeah they seem to be common in mens football but absolutely rife in the womens game.It's horrible to say it - but my first reaction was, "what, another one?"
ACL injuries feel far too frequent right now.
By a penalty awarded (as far as anyone can tell) for a foul outside the area. Not that I mindEverton win the Merseyside derby.
11 wins from 11 is quite the introduction and that’s without key players too.Is Bompastor’s Chelsea an even better version of Hayes’ Chelsea? We have yet to drop a single point in any competition this season. A 100% record in all comps in late November is crazy.
They've certainly lost nothing and they seem to have picked up some extra zip that should make them hard to stop in any competition.Is Bompastor’s Chelsea an even better version of Hayes’ Chelsea? We have yet to drop a single point in any competition this season. A 100% record in all comps in late November is crazy.
Happy WSL news!