to be fair, neither of those wanted to come to usJust to put this into context, Antony cost considerably more than Haaland and Alvarez combined. That is how far off we are in our recruitment.
Just to put this into context, Antony cost considerably more than Haaland and Alvarez combined. That is how far off we are in our recruitment.
to be fair, neither of those wanted to come to us
Haaland had a release clause, though that shouldn't excuse getting bent over for AntonyJust to put this into context, Antony cost considerably more than Haaland and Alvarez combined. That is how far off we are in our recruitment.
what context?
Yeah if you completely ignore all the bonus payments, signing fees (and wages) Haaland and his entourage pocketed.Just to put this into context, Antony cost considerably more than Haaland and Alvarez combined. That is how far off we are in our recruitment.
Huge signing.
The context of my previous post, i.e. this is just another indicator of how far we have fallen and how badly we have been run for years.
It’s a January transfer window. I’m genuinely baffled at what people are expecting? The butland transfer only happened because dubravka was recalled.Manchester United's transfer window.
IN: Butland (loan), Weghorst (loan)
I mean it is a bit mad, isn't it? I am not having a go at either player, or even that much at the deals, but feckinell, the owners and directors especially have a lot to answer for that this is what we are reduced to.
United really should've put a halt on that deal as soon as Ajax demanded more than 50 million.Yeah if you completely ignore all the bonus payments, signing fees (and wages) Haaland and his entourage pocketed.
Nonetheless, Antony for 100m looks a terrible deal so far
But your comparisons make no sense.
haaland is a striker, not a RW, and he was also just not interested in joining us. Not much to be done about that.
We had ZERO right wingers, a player like Antony was absolutely necessary and while we may have overpaid, it was a must. He has what, 4 goals so far? For a player that didn’t join at the start of the season and is new to the league, it’s not a bad start whatsoever. He will continue to improve.
we’re now in this position because of failings in previous seasons, I agree, but IMO the club has done a fantastic job since ETH has come in. Every single signing has had a positive impact on the first 11. When is the last time we had such a transfer window?
It’s a January transfer window. I’m genuinely baffled at what people are expecting? The butland transfer only happened because dubravka was recalled.
You can't judge the success of the summer transfer window yet. I am not sure about it at all. All we know is that we spent all the money we had available and more and now have no money for a striker. And yes we should have more available, and yes Ronaldo should never have been in the squad, etc. but still.
The City comparison is just to show how far off we are where we should really be, for a whole variety of reasons.
How is poor Antony getting slagged off in every thread whether it's about him or not? You'd have thought we'd signed Bebe for £80m the way people go on.
We all know we’ve been poorly run for years. We also know that the club has recently changed the way the football side is being run. With the incoming of ETH being their first real go at fixing the damage. So far, the new regime is making positive decisions in almost all aspects. They’re not going to fix all our problems in one summer window. Accept that we’re moving in a positive direction and be a little patient.You can't judge the success of the summer transfer window yet. I am not sure about it at all. All we know is that we spent all the money we had available and more and now have no money for a striker. And yes we should have more available, and yes Ronaldo should never have been in the squad, etc. but still.
The City comparison is just to show how far off we are where we should really be, for a whole variety of reasons.
I am not slagging him off at all. Good, promising player, glad he is here. But the deal was bad from any objective viewpoint considering we could barely afford it and now have no money for a position we need to strengthen. Not the player's fault at all.
I am not slagging him off at all. Good, promising player, glad he is here. But the deal was bad from any objective viewpoint considering we could barely afford it and now have no money for a position we need to strengthen. Not the player's fault at all.
We all know we’ve been poorly run for years. We also know that the club has recently changed the way the football side is being run. With the incoming of ETH being their first real go at fixing the damage. So far, the new regime is making positive decisions in almost all aspects. They’re not going to fix all our problems in one summer window. Accept that we’re moving in a positive direction and be a little patient.
please provide concrete proof for any of this?
Also I completely disagree that he has been an objectively bad deal. We had zero right wingers at the club. We paid more than we should have but he was necessary and he has made us a better team. He is also young and will continue to improve. Considering what was available in the summer, and how badly we needed to fill that position, it’s really not as bad of a transfer as you’re trying to make it out to beI am not slagging him off at all. Good, promising player, glad he is here. But the deal was bad from any objective viewpoint considering we could barely afford it and now have no money for a position we need to strengthen. Not the player's fault at all.
Again, it’s January. Us bringing in a cheap loan option doesn’t mean we’re skint, it means there’s hardly feck all available. Please give us some examples of more expensive options that would come for 6 months which the club should have instead gone for?Sure, I do accept this.
It is surely abundantly clear from what the club has said, and the fact that we are looking at bringing Wout Weghort on loan.
Some managed to convince themselves that Ighalo was a good signing so no doubt many will do the same with him. One day we'll be laughing about the time we signed Weghurst on loan and how shite he was.
We just had a record summer window, yet you expect a big Jan signing too?Manchester United's transfer window.
IN: Butland (loan), Weghorst (loan)
I mean it is a bit mad, isn't it? I am not having a go at either player, or even that much at the deals, but feckinell, the owners and directors especially have a lot to answer for that this is what we are reduced to.
We just had a record summer window, yet you expect a big Jan signing too?
There is zero budget left until the summer. Whether we like it or not that's what's happened, money isn't bottomless.
Again, it’s January. Us bringing in a cheap loan option doesn’t mean we’re skint, it means there’s hardly feck all available. Please give us some examples of more expensive options that would come for 6 months which the club should have instead gone for?
We just had a record summer window, yet you expect a big Jan signing too?
There is zero budget left until the summer. Whether we like it or not that's what's happened, money isn't bottomless.
That's not what i'm really arguing though, of course he wasn't good enough for United but at that time he was very much needed as we had only two fit strikers. He was important to fill squad depth. As I said before Larson only scored 3 goals for us on loan in 2007 but he really really helped us that season. Sometimes it's about getting a player in who can just 'do a job' and help.Ighalo seemed like a nice person and a decent striker, but he was no way near good enough for United, so I do not think it worked out fine.
Personally I think it's a shit plan B. If we don't have injuries and our forwards are in form and he doesn't play it won't matter. But in that case, near enough anyone would be a good signing, such as Ighalo.He's a plan B off the bench mate. He's not coming to be our starting number 9 for the next 5 years ffs.
Arsenal have Nketiah as their back up. Hardly a fecking world beater is he?
Well yes agreed on that, unfortunately mismanagement for a decade does that.No I don't expect a big January signing!
I am merely pointing out how mad it is, when you really think about it
I blame the Glazers, to be clear.
I think that's pretty much a certaintyI have a feeling there might be a huge clearout in the summer...
Klopp signed many low profile & bang average players.Ten Hag, Pep, Klopp, or any other top manager at top team wants the best players because they know it is what it takes to achieve their ambitions of winning trophies.
WW is not a top player. Not even close. He is hopefully not useless but like option #7 that you get when it's better than getting nothing
If you want an example of a top player, that would be Casemiro
It does make sense when you consider the way ETH normally plays. He will be a target man in the way firminio was for Liverpool, bringing others into play, reasonable in the air and a reasonable goal scoring record. He’s not what people were hoping for but he’s better than that Cameroon guy for sure. As a loan signing who will give martial a breather now and again he’s fineIt is mostly a side effect of being so badly run as a club. What happened with Greenwood was not the club's fault, but what happened with Ronaldo was totally predictable... not Ten Hag's fault and he has dealt with it fine, but then also we have completely blown our budget in the summer including paying a stupid fee for Antony. So now we have not enough options up front and no money.
I agree that Thuram looks like a better option if we could get him than a loan for a player who is let's be honest not really good enough for us. I am not saying it makes no sense but it is frustrating seeing us still in the market for this type of player.