Sky1981
Fending off the urge
I am by no means an expert on the details of FFP, but from what I’ve read that isn’t the case. It does seem weird that you’d be punished more by FFP for selling a player for a loss than just keeping an underperforming player you paid big money for. That being said, if there aren’t negative ramifications to FFP, and we get a decent offer, I’d have no objections to the club selling him. I don’t think he’s the finished product yet, and I do believe he is talented, so I would also be ok keeping him for another year to see if there is any growth under Ten Hag if we don’t get any decent offers (which I would not expect to get anyway).
Because that's what prudent finance is. Or else everyone would just write of their bad purchase and continue pumping money every year.
It's not created to hamper the rich but to safeguard the poor team who's on a shoestring budget from going under