Crashoutcassius
Full Member
what will chilwell go for? anyone feel like we would have had to pay double? why do chelsea seem to get nice rates
Good negotiating.what will chilwell go for? anyone feel like we would have had to pay double? why do chelsea seem to get nice rates
The Glazers aren't bothered about sporting success. If a trophy comes along then it's an additional bonus. They are here to maximise revenues with as little investment as possible; it's why they haven't touched OT in 15 years.
Arsenal have large cash reserves as they follow the same approach also. Kroenke and the Glazers are pretty similar, however, one hasn't cost their club over a £1 billion in debt repayments with nothing to show for it! It's a shame that our owner has.
Regarding sugar daddy clubs, City are showing intent this year after coming 2nd. They got two deals done early and it looks like Koulibaly might be on the way too. I think Ferran Torres will be a decent signing for 20 million euros; we could have bought him, its just a shame we pay out more than this each year in dividends to the Glazer family and have done for the last 5 years.
what will chilwell go for? anyone feel like we would have had to pay double? why do chelsea seem to get nice rates
what will chilwell go for? anyone feel like we would have had to pay double? why do chelsea seem to get nice rates
Personally provided we have Smalling back this year and maybe even Henderson, who knows whats gonna happen there, I would be happy with 3 or 4 signings like David Brooks.
Sancho is amazing dont get me wrong but if there is a silver lining to not getting him its that 3 of our most talented players are all young strikers and all 3 of then should score 20 goals or more next season, thats an amazing return.
All 3 of them will get much better just through natural progression cuz theyre all very young.
So yeah, Smalling back thats CB strengthened.
Brooks thats RW strengthened. Now get a full back, perhaps 2 full backs or a defensive midfielder and we are rolling.
I feel we will have sufficient star power now with Bruno, Pogba, Martial, Rashford and Greenwood. Yes I see all 5 as either stars or potential stars. Just strengthening the team, adding to the depth will go a long way for us.
It can't be understated how much of a disgrace this window has been so far.
Once again we are willingly letting the team regress after we see the first bit of progress in two years.
Disgrace to the fans.
Its a bit early for this type of crap isn't it?
Well you answered yourself there. Other clubs do it, some all the time get their business in early. Under our lot its very very rare, hence whats the point anyone moaning about it? Its not going to happen.The last years have conditioned our fans to believe it's common market practice to only make transfers less than a week before the deadline, hence all the "chill" posts.
In reality, most clubs sort their shit relatively early in the transfer window.
Well you answered yourself there. Other clubs do it, some all the time get their business in early. Under our lot its very very rare, hence whats the point moaning about it? Its not going to happen.
Not least since we end up paying the asking price anyway, 6 weeks later. But at least we save 1m on the wages...I definitely don't think the higher ups at the club appreciate how valuable a player having pre-season /training with them team earlier can be.
Like I wrote earlier, the Glazers seem willing to spend when we finish outside the top 4 in order to qualify for the Champions League the following season and receive CL money.Nonsense. The club has had investment just the managers and the recruitment has been poor. The club being bought in this way was equal to why we were able to generate money. You weep what you sow. The alternative is a sugar daddy's play thing bought by owners from countries that have horrendous history of human rights and oppression. You'd prefer that then?
Not sure why our fans seem to think everyone is doing better than we are? You realise that was 30 years since Liverpool have won the league and City haven't won the CL despite the money and manager....? Trust me, it won't be 30 years till we win either again.
I just realised that there is a long way to go in this transfer window - 5th October is still a good while away. Then there is also the 2 week domestic window.
This may be an odd season where players are moving clubs after 5-6 PL games! Insane.
I don't quite understand why we are so slow in our transfer dealings - but I will be supremely disappointed if we get to the start of the season for us (19th Sept) without at least 3 signings. RW (Sancho!), CM and CB.
I am not buying this “they are ready to invest for top 4, but not for making us title contenders”. We could invest 200 mil again this year and get 2nd place in the league and people will demand 200 mil again next year to close the gap to 1st. They have spent a lot of money since SAF retired not just in transfer fees but also in ridiculous wages. They are not perfect but also won’t be happy to see relative little success for the money spent in last years but some of it just wasted by different managers.
They have the perfect excuse not to, and they have a manager that I expect won't throw his toys out the pram as a result.
End of the day, nobody knows what's going on day to day...but if this side doesn't get at least 3 quality additions, it's on the slide.
They have the perfect excuse not to, and they have a manager that I expect won't throw his toys out the pram as a result.
End of the day, nobody knows what's going on day to day...but if this side doesn't get at least 3 quality additions, it's on the slide.
The problem isn't money it's disorganisation. We have no director of football. No single person is responsible for our inadequate squad. If we make someone responsible we also need to give them the power to sort the issues out. Because we won't give anyone this power, we'll never have a single person responsible to ensure we start the season with a squad strong enough to win the title. We could spend twice as much money in the transfer market and that issue still wouldn't be fixed.
I definitely don't think the higher ups at the club appreciate how valuable a player having pre-season /training with them team earlier can be.
I am not buying this “they are ready to invest for top 4, but not for making us title contenders”. We could invest 200 mil again this year and get 2nd place in the league and people will demand 200 mil again next year to close the gap to 1st. They have spent a lot of money since SAF retired not just in transfer fees but also in ridiculous wages. They are not perfect but also won’t be happy to see relative little success for the money spent in last years but some of it just wasted by different managers.
Like I wrote earlier, the Glazers seem willing to spend when we finish outside the top 4 in order to qualify for the Champions League the following season and receive CL money.
My issue is that the Glazers seem unwilling to make those final investments needed that will take United from a top 4 team to a title contender. Maybe the Glazers see investment at this stage as risky with no guarantee of success and therefore providing no return on investment, who knows? As a fan it's not the ambition that I want to see, especially when you can see the potential of the team that Ole is trying to build and that a few (expensive!) additions could make all the difference. Lets see how the rest of the transfer window plays out, however, already this summer does feel like the summer of 2018 where the Glazers refused to properly back the manager.
Regarding sugar daddies, no I wouldn't want a sugar daddy as an owner so that answers your question. I just want the Glazers to start putting the interests of the football club first rather than constantly looking at creative ways of taking money out. I appreciate that all owners are after returns on investments, however, the Glazers are the only owners in the Premier League to pay themselves a dividend (£20 million a year). In addition, they also pay themselves several million a year in consultancy fees. On top of all this, the club continues to pay a high price for the Glazer takeover (over £1billion lost), with still £500 million of debt to service and clear. All in all, it feels like the Glazers see United as nothing more than a personal ATM machine and are happy to ignore the sporting decline of the club since 2013 as long as the money keeps rolling in.
It is, but it's hard to fight the deja vu feeling that we'll take our sweet time getting things done (or not done as it were,) inevitably fall way behind City, Pool and Chelsea, and then find ourselves desperate in January, lamenting the fact that we didn't get stuff done in a timely manner during the summer. Rinse/repeat. I know that sounds paranoid (and it probably is to an extent,) but this club certainly has made a habit of blunting fan enthusiasm over the last few summers.Its a bit early for this type of crap isn't it?
It is, but it's hard to fight the deja vu feeling that we'll take our sweet time getting things done (or not done as it were,) inevitably fall way behind City, Pool and Chelsea, and then find ourselves desperate in January, lamenting the fact that we didn't get stuff done in a timely manner during the summer. Rinse/repeat. I know that sounds paranoid (and it probably is to an extent,) but this club certainly has made a habit of blunting fan enthusiasm over the last few summers.
Given how long it took to secure Maguire (at an eye-watering price) and the feeling that we were still woefully short, yes it was. And the 55 million in January was the desperation I mentioned, signing a player we could have had in the summer. Grow up.Yeah that £145m in the summer and another £55m in January was a real 'blunting of fans enthusiasm' wasn't it?
How on ever did we cope with just £200m to spend with no CL football to finance it? Poor old Ole.
Our fans literally are the worst cry babies known to man. The window has another 6 to 7 weeks left and our season ended 6 days ago for crying out loud.
Being at the panic stations phase right now is absolutely pathetic. Grow a back bone and man up.
So phase 1 started i guess. "It is early". Followed with "many clubs don't buying players so far" and "we have one month until the deadline".Its a bit early for this type of crap isn't it?
It is, but it's hard to fight the deja vu feeling that we'll take our sweet time getting things done (or not done as it were,) inevitably fall way behind City, Pool and Chelsea, and then find ourselves desperate in January, lamenting the fact that we didn't get stuff done in a timely manner during the summer. Rinse/repeat. I know that sounds paranoid (and it probably is to an extent,) but this club certainly has made a habit of blunting fan enthusiasm over the last few summers.
It's never too early for deja vu - after all, it's not exactly a rational emotion. And the new season starts in less than a month.It’s a bit early for this isn’t it. Our season finished less than a week ago.
quite clear that you should do some growing up. Or find ways to deal with the ‘blunt’ in your enthusiasm.Given how long it took to secure Maguire (at an eye-watering price) and the feeling that we were still woefully short, yes it was. And the 55 million in January was the desperation I mentioned, signing a player we could have had in the summer. Grow up.
So phase 1 started i guess. "It is early". Followed with "many clubs don't buying so far" and "we have one month until the deadline".
Look at our rivals.
Chelsea bought two and finishing third player.
Liverpool, who is champion and don't need to buy much, bought one and hsve good chance for Thiago.
City bought 2. And in negotiations with third.
Even Arsenal and Spurs bought something. Sure we will buy something but more time we wait, price will be higher and maybe we will miss on some targets.