HowYouDoin
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 1,020
Ummm if we plan on getting anything done now might be a good time to kinda start wrapping it up.
People are chuckling at us already, why not turn it into a laughfest.
They have first class honours degree on panicship. I made that word up.I don't want any of them, but I wouldn't put it past our club to do a domestic transfer before the 16th October knowing that the said player wouldn't be eligible in Europe.
Well, it is not irrelevant, if you are first team you will play more games. The quality bit is very subjective, it doesnt matter what you, me or anyone else thinks as long as the manager thinks they are good enough.
Again, I have never mentioned that he is not backed, he has not been backed enough to close the gap.
You are wrong here in my opinion. I agree you have to make do in some instances you have to make do. Let me ask you, If one of Martial / Greenwood/ Rashford are injured and the other has played alot of games, who do you bring in?
Arsenal - Auba, Lacca, Pepe, Saka, Willian, Willock, Martinello
Chelsea - Werner, Havertz, Giroud, Tammy, Mount, Pulisic, Ziyech
City - Aguero, Jesus, Sterling, Mahrez, Ferran, Bernado, Foden
SPurs - Kane, Vinicius, Bale, Son, Moura, Bergjwin
Manutd - Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, James, Ighalo, Lingard
James, Ighalo and Lingard wouldnt even get into any other squad, let alone come as first rotation option.
You expect our manager to out perform other teams who have better quality in the attacking half?
Well there's a lot of midfielders in those lists so it's padded somewhat. We're obviously short of attacking options i don't think anyone is arguing against that but most of those teams have weak areas of their own too.
I expect our manager to get top 3 or 4 based off the quality of the starting 11 and squad as a whole. I expect him to close the gap because we've got a good team who through coaching should be improving together.
We will and always have had teams where the filler is a bit naff. This magical 22 man squad where fans are happy with all options isn't happening. A strong 16 is more than enough for a title challenge and we're not far from that.
We've only made 5 purchases in the last 4 windows.3 days to go and our Report card reads:
ZERO sales.
One Purchase.
And my dad used to whip me (not literally) for procrastinating on my projects!
What we should look at is net transfer spend as the percentage of revenue. We spent about 6% of our total annual revenue on that total of one (1) signing and we didn't sell anyone for money. I can't be arsed to look up other clubs but I'm willing to hazard a guess that the respective percentages of most clubs will be higher.We are now 11th in the premier league for amount of money spent on transfers this window. Are we now the adult euro disney rather than Disney land?
There is no money. If you run the club on debt, one day it catches up with you.Serious question
Why aren’t we signing anyone?
I cannot think of one coherent reason why the club isn’t making any.
They MUST realise that we won’t finish in the Champions League without more signings.
Even from a money making perspective, it makes absolutely no sense because it means less money next season again. And I don’t get it.
But it has been same throughout the window. There will be nothing novel about it.I better buy extra popcorn for this weekend, all the transfer tweets, frustration and whining will be great to watch, and oh so sad.
There is no money. If you run the club on debt, one day it catches up with you.
United fans need to accept that the debt imposed on the club by the Glazers is a huge problem for the club.
What's happening now is that the debt repayments still have to be made but the club is not making any money.
Woodward does a forecast over a year and sees no sign of serious cash coming in.
No Corona virus vaccine, no money for Manchester United. It's that simple.
I see what you did there.We’d have 2 weeks to get Brooks or Sarr.
Of course he can. Thats what accountants do if I ever have to tell you. Its called budgeting.We're very lucky he's a financial genius and can see these things.
Typical Woodward, barely makes an inch.Saw on talksport we are only offering 9MM for Telles when they value at 18MM. Yes, he can leave for a free next year but then there will be competition. It would be nice to have someone like that who can move the ball from the back better than anyone we currently have on the squad.
Maybe they’ve decided qualifying for Champions League every other year, so we don’t get our sponsorship reduced, is more cost effective.Serious question
Why aren’t we signing anyone?
I cannot think of one coherent reason why the club isn’t making any.
They MUST realise that we won’t finish in the Champions League without more signings.
Even from a money making perspective, it makes absolutely no sense because it means less money next season again. And I don’t get it.
Of course he can. Thats what accountants do if I ever have to tell you. Its called budgeting.
The only problem is that in the current climate you don't need to be an accountant to see that there is no money on the horizon coming into the club.
Andreas to Lazio
Smalling to Roma
Dalot to Milan
Still time for Lingard and Jones to go
Our wafer thin squad winning at its move to being paper thin![]()
Had a post a little above this, we have a squad size of 31 less 4 players 21 or under (Dalot/Mengi/Williams/Greenwood) leaving 27 senior players, when you can select a squad of 25 for CL/PL. So the squad isn't really wafer thin. No room for Andreas or Chris, Dalot questionable given his age, but maybe he paves the way for either Laird, or Williams switching and Telles coming in, if I'm optimistic (I'm not).
If we sold or loaned Jones/Rojo/Smalling/Romero we'd still have 23 senior squad players. 22 if Lingard left. Only then does it leave room for 2 or 3 incomings, but I think Lingard is staying, probably Jones too unless we get him a loan, which would leave room for 1 incoming over 21..
If I was Wumming I'd say Sancho is only 20, Dembele 23, Sarr 22, Brooks 23, also King/Cavani etc much older. So if Telles is coming and we sign a winger who isn't Sancho, we'd be leaving someone without a squad number, like Rojo or Jones.
If we don't shift anyone other than Dalot, i.e. Smalling/Romero/Rojo/Jones stay, we have 27 players who need squad numbers. If we sign 2 players over 21, we'll have 4 unregistered in the PL/CL squads. Either we sell/loan, or we are gonna be in a financial/Squad registration mess, with some very unhappy players who will quickly be losing value even further (I know, Rojo/Jones etc already have a minimal value).
I mean I'm not moaning about the players we're letting go because ultimately there's only really 15 or 16 Ole really trusts but still we're obviously selling way more than we're bringing in
Leeds , Wolves and villa have all spent twice what we have spent. Glazer's are Parasites. it's a sad state of affairs![]()
Sheffield United showing more ambition than us is kind of hilarious.
Agree buddy. Am Deloitte so I perfectly understand your PWC narrative.Accountants come in different flavours. The issue is we have x2 (at least) in Eddy & Matty who are ex PWC.
PWC bods are arrrogant sycophants who think they are the best and there in lies the issue. Overlay the the huge debt which Eddy was central to in the takeover and that his central role is protect the the Adams family investment & yearly syphoning .
The Glazers could bust a flush as to funding with selling more of their shares but hey why would they, as the only purpose of this is for a family Brucie bonus.
We are royally screwed & to make it worse the Scouserpudlians will overhaul us. Its the latter that the fans should not accept. They were dead & buried untill we screwed in getting Klopp & got lucky with Countinho sale in a hyper inflated market.
We need these zombies out of our club