aeh1991
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2022
- Messages
- 1,334
For a 19 year old in his debut game, not conceding and not struggling too much is a succesful first half imo.
Nothing wrong with being excited by Willy.Be careful, negative Andies don't like when people get excited by young players.
But yeah, he looks solid so far.
Oh I'm very aware of what I intended thank you very much. Perhaps your post wasn't intended to be so pathetic? Where did I state that the player was being selected purely for his strength? Another poor, poor, post by yourself.The point of unconscious bias is you are not aware it exists, so not overly surprised at your denialism.
The player has been selected for more than strength. If that was the only determining factor then Eddie Hall would be a centre half. It's a legitimate comment and well documented.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ls-racial-bias-in-english-football-commentary
https://www.varsity.co.uk/sport/20446
Embarrassing this. Trying to provoke a race debate. How do people describe kobe Mainoo? Intelligence is probably one of the main things. Take you race agenda somewhere else.Always cringe a bit when black sportspeople are described as "strong" or "athletic".
Been a lot of studies into the language used by journalists, broadcasters, scouts, etc. before and the biases based on race are astounding. White sportspeople more likely to be described as " intelligent " "creative" "technical" etc. whereas "freak" "raw" "strong" "athletic" used for their black colleagues.
Don't know about you but i hear it banded around alot about gym guys too. Don't have to take everything so sensitively.Not to mention the term "beast", which is clearly more used for dark-skinned players. I've always found that very awkward.
Stop.Always cringe a bit when black sportspeople are described as "strong" or "athletic".
Been a lot of studies into the language used by journalists, broadcasters, scouts, etc. before and the biases based on race are astounding. White sportspeople more likely to be described as " intelligent " "creative" "technical" etc. whereas "freak" "raw" "strong" "athletic" used for their black colleagues.
AgreedEmbarrassing this. Trying to provoke a race debate. How do people describe kobe Mainoo? Intelligence is probably one of the main things. Take you race agenda somewhere else.
Fair enough. I merely pointed out black players are more likely to be described for physical attributes and underlying cause is unconscious racism.Oh I'm very aware of what I intended thank you very much. Perhaps your post wasn't intended to be so pathetic? Where did I state that the player was being selected purely for his strength? Another poor, poor, post by yourself.
The point of unconscious bias is you are not aware it exists, so not overly surprised at your denialism.
The player has been selected for more than strength. If that was the only determining factor then Eddie Hall would be a centre half. It's a legitimate comment and well documented.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ls-racial-bias-in-english-football-commentary
https://www.varsity.co.uk/sport/20446
It's literally supported by all data and research to date.Embarrassing this. Trying to provoke a race debate. How do people describe kobe Mainoo? Intelligence is probably one of the main things. Take you race agenda somewhere else.
That's true and I didn't say definitively it was racism in this instance, just it makes me uncomfortable. I'd rather we erred on the side of caution and if we do legitimately discuss physical attributes, we talk objectively about top speed, distance covered, aerial duels won, etc. It seems to be in the generalisation or labelling of players in which we find the bias.I fully understand the point you’re making and it is a sad fact of sports media in general.
However in this instance, there is literally very few reference points to assess the skill or potential impact of the player in question apart from what is obvious which is his physicality and height. I think a bit of nuance needs to be applied. Not that it matters but I say this as a person of colour.
Garnacho’s shoelaces is outdoing you on here I’m afraidWilly rising to the occasion
Willy standing tall
Willy pulled off at half time
United introduce Big Willy but flaccid in attack
No Dicks for West Ham but United field Big Willy
Willy shoots for the top
Willy explodes in the box
Willy uses his head
Just stopI want to see Willy.
Just stop
Car crash of a post.Always cringe a bit when black sportspeople are described as "strong" or "athletic".
Been a lot of studies into the language used by journalists, broadcasters, scouts, etc. before and the biases based on race are astounding. White sportspeople more likely to be described as " intelligent " "creative" "technical" etc. whereas "freak" "raw" "strong" "athletic" used for their black colleagues.
This is an interesting and important topic. I’m unsure however whether an individual player’s performance thread is the best place for it. Probably deserved its own thread or else go in an existing racism in football one, and I think you’ll get more productive replies/discussion that way too.The point of unconscious bias is you are not aware it exists, so not overly surprised at your denialism.
The player has been selected for more than strength. If that was the only determining factor then Eddie Hall would be a centre half. It's a legitimate comment and well documented.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ls-racial-bias-in-english-football-commentary
https://www.varsity.co.uk/sport/20446
This is an interesting and important topic. I’m unsure however whether an individual player’s performance thread is the best place for it. Probably deserved its own thread or else go in an existing racism in football one, and I think you’ll get more productive replies/discussion that way too.
I think they’d know if they have unconscious bias or notI think you're right. Posting it here seems to only have triggered a few people who do not understand the concept of unconscious bias.
Well no that is why its called unconscious. Saying that though calling a physically strong player physically strong is not unconscious biasI think they’d know if they have unconscious bias or not
An individual performance that was a debut. That’s what’s to praise.We still lost by 2 goals, what's there to praise
We still lost by 2 goals, what's there to praise
It's literally supported by all data and research to date.
Yes, you can use that language without bias but the overrepresentation is attributed to unconscious bias.
PENIS!Willy rising to the occasion
Willy standing tall
Willy pulled off at half time
United introduce Big Willy but flaccid in attack
No Dicks for West Ham but United field Big Willy
Willy shoots for the top
Willy explodes in the box
Willy uses his head
Disgusting!PENIS!
You missed my jokeWell no that is why its called unconscious. Saying that though calling a physically strong player physically strong is not unconscious bias
Willy rising to the occasion
Willy standing tall
Willy pulled off at half time
United introduce Big Willy but flaccid in attack
No Dicks for West Ham but United field Big Willy
Willy shoots for the top
Willy explodes in the box
Willy uses his head
Always cringe a bit when black sportspeople are described as "strong" or "athletic".
Been a lot of studies into the language used by journalists, broadcasters, scouts, etc. before and the biases based on race are astounding. White sportspeople more likely to be described as " intelligent " "creative" "technical" etc. whereas "freak" "raw" "strong" "athletic" used for their black colleagues.
I did wonder about this user name…