TheRedHearted
Full Member
Yes I just checked the websiteWell, it's official.
Yes I just checked the websiteWell, it's official.
There has to be a statistic and algorithm used to determine who is actually the best.Well obviously. Why do you need people to tell you that?
Of his time definitely. As for all time , unless we got time machine to transport peak messi to play in the 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s 80s and 90s. We wont know.
The only sport where their isn't a dispute at to who the greatest is in hockey. And that's Wayne Gretzky. His nickname is even "The great one."
"The Great One is the best scorer ever, and it's not close.
For a simple explanation of Wayne Gretzky's dominance, consider this: He totaled 1,963 assists over his 21 years. No player in history has collected more goals and assists combined than he has assists, and you can add 894 more goals to that account.
Mario Lemieux is the only other player to register 160 points in a season, hitting the mark four times. Gretzky did it nine times, maxing out at 215 and breaking 200 four times.
Gretzky, who hoisted the Stanley Cup four times, captured 18 All-Star nods, 10 Art Ross Trophies and nine Hart Trophies.
He holds numerous career records—most notably points, goals and assists—in both the regular season and playoffs.
He also holds or shares 61 records listed in the League's Official Guide and Record Book: 40 for the regular season, 15 for the Stanley Cup playoff and six for the All-Star Game.
*The Art Ross Trophy is awarded to the National Hockey League player who leads the league in points at the end of the regular season.
*The Hart Trophy, is an annual award for the most valuable player in the National Hockey League."
Seems to be Messi fans desperately need to tell the rest of the world Messi is the GOAT.
Whereas the rest of the world know he isn’t.
Majority of football fans think Messi is the GOAT..
Not sure that is true at all.
There's millions and millions of football fans. You can't just count people your age who post on forums.
Because he just won the World Cup and many people said if he did he'd be the best ever.Unless Fifa have given some kind of title or award as the greatest player of all time then surely it's still just opinion, albeit an opinion widely held by most people, but it's not the sort of thing that could ever be said to be official?
It's decades behind club footballThe world cup is the pinnacle of the sport. Pele has 3. No doubt Pele is the GOAT.
There were many great players who played in the 80s and 90s. Why wasn't anyone close to Gretzky in stats then in that same time period?Bobby Orr led the league in scoring as a defenseman.
His plus/minus record is + 128 on a season.
He killed penalties by himself.
At times he was hardly trying as to not embarrass teams
Gretzky was incredible but his Era was the high scoring 80s and 90s.
You could argue Orr was better although his career was so short.
Are any of his opponents powerhouse or weak shit for him to stat padding ?
I guess he ‘officially’ ended the debate with Ronaldo, nobody can rationally put forward a strong argument that Ronaldo was a better football than Messi now without showing considerable bias. Since the past 10 years the debate has been about those two players, it’s nice that it’s fading away and ending and we can all relax.
However, anyone with football history knowledge knows how great Pele was, that’s the next debate for 20 years (already happening in another thread), Messi vs Pele. Unlike Messi vs Ronaldo where Messi outperformed Ronaldo in the same era with much the same parameters (played in the same league for 9 years), Pele vs Messi has far too many external factors to give a definitive answer. So it’s really an unanswerable question - the best kind of internet question - which means the debate can go on forever.
At which point their grandkids will tell them that Messi is overrated, wouldn't cut it in the modern game, and that the current FM regen has already eclipsed everyone before him.When you're a nobody you'd like to be a part of something special to feel good about yourself.
It's why people idolize other people that have large followings.
And in this case, it's to be part of peak football enjoyment so you can tell your grandsons "I watched Messi every week when I was your age". So they want him to be the GOAT. Most of them didn't get to experience Maradona and Pele.
Because you say so?
When both coincided in Spain they are pretty much even, believe it or not, with Ronaldo scoring more and Messi with more G+A, with Messi scoring and G+A more in La Liga and Ronaldo scoring and G+A more in the Champions League.
The difference between them is minimal, especially when you take in consideration Argentina is stronger on average than Portugal and that Ronaldo started in Sporting while Messi started in a CL winning Barça side.
Going to decimals and all that just to differenciate them shows how same they are.
They are equally efficient and that's why I say they are equal, they just have different styles of play.
It's decades behind club football
It is probably the biggest stage, but not the pinnacle of the sport. Most PL / CL last 16 teams would've had a chance to win the WC since they are tactially better than almost every national side.
He was crowned with a black mosquito net, we all saw it.Unless Fifa have given some kind of title or award as the greatest player of all time...
That's only half the argument though. Yes, tackles and aggression in general were far worse, but so were the defenders' strength, pace, discipline, tactical prowess, knowledge of the opponent and so on. My point is that "the protection from referees" is not the only aspect of the game that has changed significantly over the decades, and thus, only mentioning that aspect is rather disingenuous.It's all subjective. What heights would Pele, Maradona, Platini, Cruyff, Best etc have scaled if they had the protection from referees that modern day players enjoy?
Some of the tackles from back in the day would get you arrested now.
Because you say so?
When both coincided in Spain they are pretty much even, believe it or not, with Ronaldo scoring more and Messi with more G+A, with Messi scoring and G+A more in La Liga and Ronaldo scoring and G+A more in the Champions League.
The difference between them is minimal, especially when you take in consideration Argentina is stronger on average than Portugal and that Ronaldo started in Sporting while Messi started in a CL winning Barça side.
Going to decimals and all that just to differenciate them shows how same they are.
They are equally efficient and that's why I say they are equal, they just have different styles of play.
Barcelona won 6 leagues to Real Madrid’s 2 leagues. Barca won 5 Copa del Rey’s to Ronaldo’s 2. Messi scored 50 goals in a season. Messi had more man of the match awards. Messi had a higher average rating. Messi won La Liga Player of the Year 5 times, Ronaldo won it once.
Because you say so?
When both coincided in Spain they are pretty much even, believe it or not, with Ronaldo scoring more and Messi with more G+A, with Messi scoring and G+A more in La Liga and Ronaldo scoring and G+A more in the Champions League.
The difference between them is minimal, especially when you take in consideration Argentina is stronger on average than Portugal and that Ronaldo started in Sporting while Messi started in a CL winning Barça side.
Going to decimals and all that just to differenciate them shows how same they are.
They are equally efficient and that's why I say they are equal, they just have different styles of play.
Ronaldo played under some of the greatest managers ever like Allegri
Are you kidding?
How can they be equal when Messi won 7 La Liga best player awards vs mighty Ronaldo with 1, 5 Pichichis vs Ronaldo with 3?
How can they be equal when Messi won all these while running the game as a GOAT level playmaker + dribbler?
Have you ever compared type of assists Messi/Modric/Xavi/Zidane make with Ronaldo's?
Why are you conveniently ignoring the fact that Ronaldo played under some of the greatest managers ever like SAF, Mourinho, Ancelotti, Allegri, Zidane etc. while Messi only played under one top-class manager, Guardiola?
Why are you conveniently ignoring that Messi is a GOAT level playmaker (4 times IFFHS world's best playmaker award), a record+ dribbler while Ronaldo is none of that (not even a top-100 player in terms of technique?
Why are you conveniently ignoring that Messi has more Golden Shoes than Ronaldo, the area where Ronaldo is supposed to be the greatest (goal-scoring)? or that Messi has more Ballon D'ors and is on the way for an 8th..
Why are you conveniently ignoring that Messi won every single tournament he participated in for Argentina and was chosen as the best player in every single one of them (Olympics, Copa twice, WC twice, U-20 WC) while Ronaldo "0" with 0 knock-out goals+assists in 5 WCs?
Yeah, to me they look pretty similar ..
Are you by any chance form Portugal? Yeah, just checked, not surprised..
while Ronaldo fanboy base significantly shrank in the last 6 months with most not even debating if he is better than Messi anymore, it seems we still have some left choosing to live in their own bubble..
Messi won La Liga best player award 7 times, Ronaldo once, Griezman once between 2009-18..
Also, Barca won Copa Del Rey 7 times between 2009-18.. In addition, Messi won Pichichi 5 times vs Ronaldo with 3 within the same time-frame..
It is now.
It wasn't when Pele was winning them.