kaku06
Vulgarian
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2022
- Messages
- 3,461
Quality control
More like Buyin-nadir. That’s why united bought him.
Of course Ten Hag saw something in him. What else is new? Bald piece of shit.
Yes.How old are you? 5?
You seem like an extremely angry guyOf course Ten Hag saw something in him. What else is new? Bald piece of shit.
I think Kovar went for slightly more than we paid for Altay but it all came down to being able to book the entire Kovar fee in last seasons accounts whilst spreading out the cost of his replacement over five years giving us more financial flexibility. A rotten short sighted decision even without the benefit of hindsight but the consequence of a terrible recruitment strategy and paying wildly inflated fees for average players.
I think because we couldn't get Verbruggen or anyone else that we really wanted as a number 2 behind Onana.
It's not a pressing issue right now, but I hope we find an Ortega/Kelleher level number 2 eventually.
It's probably because those former great keepers belonged to an era when being able to pass the ball hadn't yet become the most important asset of a goalkeeper like it is these days. And, while I am saying that in jest, there may even be some validity to it if you look at Forster's performance today, who at 36, looked like a dinosaur trying to play out from the back.It was a bizarre signing at the time.
I never understand why clubs moved away from just signing a veteran keeper as the #2 and having the best young lad at the club as the #3
There must be a tonne of goalkeepers in the 31-36 bracket who were once top, top keepers and would now be happy to play 5 games a season
Brighton paid 16m for him. I don't think we'd have spunked that and the 47m on Onana. Don't get me wrong, that would absolutely be the correct thing to do, but Verbruggen was breaking through and at that point in his career he wouldn't have joined behind a GK that cost almost 50m and just played in the CL final. I think we may have been looking at Verbruggen as potential #1 or looking to sign two major prospects at the same time.
Anyhow, I don't think it's a huge ask to get in either a solid 30-33 year old keeper who is good in the dressing room, or a serious young prospect who will always be in the match day squad and get minutes in the cups because they are actually good enough to warrant that. And if Onana has a period where he's dropping clangers, he's out of the team for a game or two. It's healthy.
Heaton of course is just too old.
The role of once-decent aging English keeper paid just to hang around the place in case of emergency is already filled by Tom Heaton. Man City have Scott Carson for the same reason (who replaced Richard Wright), Chelsea have Marcus Bettinelli, Spurs have Fraser Forster, etc. "Top, top" keepers generally play to a ripe old age these days. I can't think of any that'd be willing to semi-retire in their early 30s as a backup. Maybe De Gea would have had he signed his contract in time, considering he took an entire year out of the game.It was a bizarre signing at the time.
I never understand why clubs moved away from just signing a veteran keeper as the #2 and having the best young lad at the club as the #3
There must be a tonne of goalkeepers in the 31-36 bracket who were once top, top keepers and would now be happy to play 5 games a season
Verbruggen snubbed us for Brighton for game time concerns. That to me suggests he would've been brought in as an understudy for Onana, rather than have two young inexperienced guys fight for the number 1.
Of course Ten Hag saw something in him. What else is new? Bald piece of shit.
Didn’t we also want to sign Suzuki last year? No idea, why the club stopped looking for a decent number two.
Seriously? There can't be ANY excuse for conceding straight from a corner. He absolutely bottled it.Two mistakes. Not his fault, cant put a player in who hasnt played football at all for months and expect him to deliver
And probably challenge for no.1…. It’s been quite disappointing we’ve not been able to get a goalkeeper from our academy challenging for no.1 position. Foster I think is the only one that got few games.If Vitek carries on doing well on loan, he should be our number 2 next season.
Look at Liverpools any player in any position compared to oursJaysus that was one abysmal display. Look at Liverpools number 2 compared to ours.
The first goal, he made a great stop, only to miss-palm the ball in the direction of Solanke.
It could have gone anywhere and our defenders could have reacted quicker, instead of being rooted to the spot.
No chance with their 2nd and 3rd.
Not his fault.
Our DM and defence was all over the place.
The 4th goal he was heavily impeded by the Swedish lad, marginally just short of a foul, but should have been stronger.
It was a wicked ball in from the corner.
.
Jaysus that was one abysmal display. Look at Liverpools number 2 compared to ours.
Foster wasn't an academy player.And probably challenge for no.1…. It’s been quite disappointing we’ve not been able to get a goalkeeper from our academy challenging for no.1 position. Foster I think is the only one that got few games.
He is also a super chill guy who doesn't mind not playing every match but actually appreciates having time to rest. There is a reason why last season was his best in ages when he did not play as many games as usual due to Kovar getting about a third of the starts. Team spirit matters and if you look at this detail it's hard to find a better keeper to challenge. Other keepers have far more ego than to allow that (thinking about Neuer for example who practically makes it impossible for Bayern to sign a strong second keeper)Sure, Hradecky is their captain so he's hard to compete against,