Forevergiggs1
Full Member
Because he has the best/worst? PR team in the business who has the media eating out of their hand. Quid pro quo.Why isn't every player linked with those clubs then?
Because he has the best/worst? PR team in the business who has the media eating out of their hand. Quid pro quo.Why isn't every player linked with those clubs then?
The difference is I’m not saying Rashford is some world beater & his struggles are the fault of [list the many players/reasons you’ve used for] the player you like.Odd thing to bring up Maguire from someone who has 82 posts (3 less) in said thread, all hammering him. A prime example of picking and choosing who to support.
I don't think Rashford is that good, simple as that. I haven't scapegoated him for anything.
You're right, I think Maguire is a 'world beater' because I don't think all of our defensive problems are down to him (as can be seen when he doesn't play and we still can't defend). None of which has anything to do with whether I think Rashford is good enough for us or not.The difference is I’m not saying Rashford is some world beater & his struggles are the fault of [list the many players/reasons you’ve used for] the player you like.
One is a boyhood United fan that has been part of sporadic successes during his time here, the other an £80mil albatross that has played against his teammates just as many times as Rashford has this season. You’ve picked a strange hill. I’m more on about consistency than anything, you’ve no reason to defend some players but you have.
Yeah, that must be why there's these constant rumours that he's wanted by Villa, Everton and Wolves. No wait, that was actually PSG and Bayern Munchen...
Marcus Rashford is a throw back to the "Class of 92" and The Busby Babes; a reminder of great, exciting home grown players like Bobby Charlton, George Best, Sammy McIlroy, Ryan Giggs, David Beckham and Paul Scholes; Rashford is a link, admittedly a sentimental one, to by gone glories and great United teams and when he first appeared thats how he was seen, as a link to better times. Sadly Rashford has lost his way but it seems he still loves the Club so I hope that Ten Hag can rejuvenate him and help him become the player we all hoped he would be. I'd offer him a contract for two more years on the same money hes on now and see how it goes.
The relevance is you’re willing to defend the indefensible with one squad member but not giving another squad member the same blind faith despite said squad member being younger & having literally done more for the club. In this thread I’ve called Rashford a disgrace & terrible so I’m certainly not defending his performances, but given you don’t acknowledge other players blatant failings you’re hardly one to talk about players falling short of previous standards.You're right, I think Maguire is a 'world beater' because I don't think all of our defensive problems are down to him (as can be seen when he doesn't play and we still can't defend). None of which has anything to do with whether I think Rashford is good enough for us or not.
He doesn't have potential. He wouldn't have even got a game if we had a competent team since 2013. Welbeck was/is better.
Danny Welbeck was a great guy and very hard worker. He'd never have acted like Rashford did last season (especially his lack of effort under Rangnick). Don't think it's fair that he gets lumped in with Rashford.Danny Welbeck with better PR.
A fair point.Danny Welbeck was a great guy and very hard worker. He'd never have acted like Rashford did last season (especially his lack of effort under Rangnick). Don't think it's fair that he gets lumped in with Rashford.
Because he has the best/worst? PR team in the business who has the media eating out of their hand. Quid pro quo.
This is the 2nd time ive seen this posted since yesterday. He's depressed now?I think he's been scapegoated a bit by people essentially putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with 5.
He's clearly unhappy and low on confidence. That lack of confidence can be interpreted into being disinterested, not trying etc. But when you're depressed, it's hard to stay motivated to do anything.
He should absolutely stay next season. Although it's make or break for him. But that's the case for a lot of the squad.
It's just having an opinion, I don't need policing by you. You hate Maguire, we get it. Just because I don't join the pile on and provide an alternate view that our centre backs might not be the biggest problem in the team that somehow means I think he's amazing?The relevance is you’re willing to defend the indefensible with one squad member but not giving another squad member the same blind faith despite said squad member being younger & having literally done more for the club. In this thread I’ve called Rashford a disgrace & terrible so I’m certainly not defending his performances, but given you don’t acknowledge other players blatant failings you’re hardly one to talk about players falling short of previous standards.
Consistency is all I ask for, we all like players over another but don’t give it, couldn’t get into the squad of 2013 in here when you’re the first to defend the most underwhelming signing of a generation in another thread with anything other than his actual performances.
It's just having an opinion, I don't need policing by you. You hate Maguire, we get it. Just because I don't join the pile on and provide an alternate view that our centre backs might not be the biggest problem in the team that somehow means I think he's amazing?
I probably went overboard with 'no potential'. If Rashford can get back to his best he can be useful but I just don't see it coming.
Hopefully. The main difference for me is that Varane and Lindelof looked just as bad, often worse than Maguire, indicating a system issue. Whereas Elanga came in a did a far better job than Rashford despite it.Maguire has had a shocker of a season, that's unarguable.
However, seeing as those every single team seemed to race through our centre mid and leave the defence exposed, he again, like Rashford has a fresh slate with a new manager who may have some semblance of tactics, plus has the ability to buy players to fix that.
The jury is massively out though. It's not all everyone else's fault when a lot of the times he just passes straight to an opponent, lets someone cruise past him, or ends up shoving someone like Shaw over.
A bit off topic, but this point brings up an interesting question. Is Rashford's PR team good because of how hard they work to make him look better, or do other players have PR teams that are more competent and don't make it obvious to everyone when they're scheming in the media?Because he has the best/worst? PR team in the business who has the media eating out of their hand. Quid pro quo.
Hopefully. The main difference for me is that Varane and Lindelof looked just as bad, often worse than Maguire, indicating a system issue. Whereas Elanga came in a did a far better job than Rashford despite it.
They are a huge problem in both attack and defence.People seem to overlook that we were stuck with the back up full backs for long chunks of the season, Dalot and Telles.
Some seemed to think Dalot offered loads more to WB, but for me, he was at best marginally better going forwards and worse defensively.
Those rumours were probably engineered by his PR team. U are right though. He will probably do ok at Everton and Wolves.
They are a huge problem in both attack and defence.