who still thinks liverpool are boring?

We all know that Liverpool are boring, most Liverpool fans admit it. If they win the Premiership it will be a sad day for english football, because no one wants a boring, lucky team to win it.

One thing is for sure is that they will never win the Champions League playing such boring and simple football.

Even Phil Thompson on Sky Sports said today that they play ugly football. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by dave007:
<strong>most Liverpool fans admit it. If they win the Premiership it will be a sad day for english football</strong><hr></blockquote>


"most Liverpool fans" what the feck are you talking about :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>

i didnt know ABLs existed but anyway

</strong>

you've all been ABLs so long you'd all but forgotten about it. but now we're looking likely to win the league in the next couple of years, you're all reverting to type

<strong>
what the hell has louis edwards done to you? and by the martin edwards is still at the club so using past tense on him shows you are particularly dumb.</strong>

martin edwards is no longer the owner and chairman, is he? that was the context of my past tense

as for louis edwards? forget the way he stalked small shareholders and used whatever tactics he could to gain a majority ownership of united. forget the way he played on the munich air disaster for his own personal ends. even forget the scandal of his crooked share-dealings later in his life, but never ever forget the way he made his money ... black market profiteering during the war and the subsequent years of rationing. he was a crook and a true parasite of a man. evil through and through
<hr></blockquote>
Click to expand...
 
do you have any evidence of this slander elljay?

because i have never even heard the abu press have a go at united about that, only a sad bitter liverpool fan.

:rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>do you have any evidence of this slander elljay?

because i have never even heard the abu press have a go at united about that, only a sad bitter liverpool fan.
</strong><hr></blockquote>

it's not slander. first, because it's a statement made in a quasi-permanent form, which means that if it was a defamatory statement it would be libellous not slanderous

however, it's not defamatory for two reasons ...

first, you can't defame a dead person. he cannot be damaged by the statement.

second, it's true

do i have firm documented evidence? no. but is this something that was a commonly understood truth in manchester in the 50s and 60s? yes. during the second world war, my maternal grandparents ran a corner shop in salford, and my grandfather - though a united fan - had nothing but contempt for edwards right up until the day he died. he knew exactly how he'd made his first minor fortune and always considered him an untrustworthy crook

so yes, my grandfather was bitter towards edwards.

me? i was just trying to make the point that arseholes who try to score points about john smith's utterly misjudged remarks about "chelsea fans" or who persist in calling liverpool fans "graverobbers" while quoting the sun and the star as their source, really ought to think better of it because one way or another we all live in glass houses
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by elljay:
<strong>

it's not slander. first, because it's a statement made in a quasi-permanent form, which means that if it was a defamatory statement it would be libellous not slanderous

however, it's not defamatory for two reasons ...

first, you can't defame a dead person. he cannot be damaged by the statement.

second, it's true

do i have firm documented evidence? no. but is this something that was a commonly understood truth in manchester in the 50s and 60s? yes. during the second world war, my maternal grandparents ran a corner shop in salford, and my grandfather - though a united fan - had nothing but contempt for edwards right up until the day he died. he knew exactly how he'd made his first minor fortune and always considered him an untrustworthy crook

so yes, my grandfather was bitter towards edwards.

me? i was just trying to make the point that arseholes who try to score points about john smith's utterly misjudged remarks about "chelsea fans" or who persist in calling liverpool fans "graverobbers" while quoting the sun and the star as their source, really ought to think better of it because one way or another we all live in glass houses</strong><hr></blockquote>


it could offend relatives of louis edwards and why are you getting so worked up about him?

did you know him?

did he affect your life personally?
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>


it could offend relatives of louis edwards and why are you getting so worked up about him?

did you know him?

did he affect your life personally?</strong><hr></blockquote>


you obviously can't read at all, can you?

never mind
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:
<strong>

WTF are you on about? Who mentioned Chelsea? Do you have any idea why I passed comment about The S*n?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Lots of Liverpool fans in the Merseyside area boycot the Sun and I fully understand why (and sales there have never really recovered).

However, throughout the rest of the country the LFC fans still buy it. You see them at Crewe station on a Saturday reading it. I once asked one of them why they bought the Sun when they were so disrespectful to LFC in the past and he said "what are you on about?". Says it all really.

All tabloids are shit IMO :mad:

ps according to the official programme (in the chaimans notes) fartin is still the chairman :mad:
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.