Eriku
Full Member
What on earth?
Who knew Richard Keys frequented the Caf?
What on earth?
It happens with only United fans and British fans. No one outside that circle sees him as one of the best midfielders.Great leader Keane, good tackler, decent passer, but that's kind of it. He doesn't posses even a quarter of Paul's technical abilities.
Dunno why I feel that most people overrate Keane just because he was a leader.
Explain yourself. It seems that leadership is more valued on here than talent. Watching Kane and Viera you'd think that it was obvious who was the better player between the two, but not in the view of some people.What in the holy world of shit is this? I'm not even a Utd fan but even I know this is utter nonsense of the highest order.
Explain yourself. It seems that leadership is more valued on here than talent. Watching Kane and Viera you'd think that it was obvious who was the better player between the two, but not in the view of some people.
So you were fine when we sold japp stam.?
What in the holy world of shit is this? I'm not even a Utd fan but even I know this is utter nonsense of the highest order.
How is it obvious? I presume you meant Keane, not Kane.Explain yourself. It seems that leadership is more valued on here than talent. Watching Kane and Viera you'd think that it was obvious who was the better player between the two, but not in the view of some people.
Math is lost on you I thinkI’d sell him for 90m now in a heartbeat. His value is only going down.
If we wait until summer, he’s most likely to fetch a bit more, maybe 120m.
I think what the guy who said that meant is that Pogba is an unique kind of midfielder, a level above any other midfield like Messi is above any other player.
Pogba is twice the player Roy Keane was. Robson, I didn't watch him play to have a fair personal view of him, how many years he played in the PL format?
I think what the guy who said that meant is that Pogba is an unique kind of midfielder, a level above any other midfield like Messi is above any other player.
Pogba is twice the player Roy Keane was. Robson, I didn't watch him play to have a fair personal view of him, how many years he played in the PL format?
Yeah it's that time I need a break from the Caf
I think what the guy who said that meant is that Pogba is an unique kind of midfielder, a level above any other midfield like Messi is above any other player.
Pogba is twice the player Roy Keane was. Robson, I didn't watch him play to have a fair personal view of him, how many years he played in the PL format?
He can watch, just not post.You shouldn't be allowed to watch football.
It's also trendy these days to proclaim how overrated players like Keane and Scholes were, and how they weren't rated on the continent like real players.You get stuff like that nowadays with the generation that just started watching footie after YouTube became a big thing. I choose just to ignore it and revel in the feeling of being an old grumpy bastard.
Great leader Keane, good tackler, decent passer, but that's kind of it. He doesn't posses even a quarter of Paul's technical abilities.
Dunno why I feel that most people overrate Keane just because he was a leader.
You wouldn't. Nobody watched Pogba of France and Juve and in their right mind felt be was twice the player Roy Keane was. As per the French posters he wasn't even in their top 3-4 players for France.Only if you watched Pogba under Mourinho. If you watched him at Juve and in his NT you'd have a different opinion.
Neither did Rio Ferdinand. Neither does DDG. Better players, though.Great leader Keane, good tackler, decent passer, but that's kind of it. He doesn't posses even a quarter of Paul's technical abilities.
Dunno why I feel that most people overrate Keane just because he was a leader.
Because Viera had to do more for his team than shielding the defence? Viera needed another player next to him because, like Pogba, he had more to offer going forward and his talent couldn't allow him to only sit back and protect the back 4.How is it obvious? I presume you meant Keane, not Kane.
Firstly, Keane was much better defensively. Vieira always had to play next to another defensive midfielder, and the rare time he was expected to do it himself he struggled. Whereas Keane was doing it next to a very attack-minded Scholes. In terms of controlling the team around, it was close but I'd give Keane the edge. That's the thing which a lot of people tend to completely forget how good Keane was at doing - controlling the team and setting the tempo of the match. Vieira was better at driving the ball forward himself and had more tricks with the ball at his feet, but overall I do give Keane the edge.
In terms of direct battles between them, the only time Vieira got the better of Keane was during the two or so year period when Keane's level started dropping. Before that Keane almost always won the individual battle. And then right at the end when Vieira started dropping away as well, Keane once against started getting the better of him despite being even further past his best.
Under Mourinho i'd have sold him for a quid, he was that bad. Attitude and performance was a disgrace.
Under Ole - he's booming. He looks to be enjoying his time here again and playing much better.
For me, in this market. 150 million and above and it would be worth considering. As the selling club, with no reason to sell unless Pogba is actively wanting out, we hold the cards.
He may have talent, but if things don't go his way then he'll stink the place out no worries. He has a big influence in the dressing room, if he is pouting then that will transfer to others too
That being said, in this form. I wouldn't sell him. But he has the potential to want away, every player has they're price.
To PSG - I'd take 100mil + Verrati.
To Juve - I'd take 80 mil + Dybala
To Real - I'd take 200mil
To Barca - I'd take 80mil + Coutinho
Until this, I thought you were just young or clueless (or both) but now I see you're just wumming... the Cafs clickbait poster.Because Viera had to do more for his team than shielding the defence? Viera needed another player next to him because, like Pogba, he had more to offer going forward and his talent couldn't allow him to only sit back and protect the back 4.
Keane is the typical British midfielder, less talented but a lot of aggressiveness and energy to run around like a mad dog. Those type of players look great under a well oiled team where their lack of skills are covered by other creative players (see Milner at Liverpool) , but would struggle under a different set up where their flaws would get exposed (Henderson when Liverpool struggle).
When they faced, Keane looked good because his game (most of the time our games against Wenger Arsenal) consisted on kicking the shite out of them, a physical game to compensate from the difference of talent between the two teams. Keane was more physical than Viera, reason why he was more effective in those games.
This.Anyone who seriously compares Roy Keane to Milner and Henderson should instantly be banned from this forum or at the very least given an appropriate tagline.
I suppose the reason he was so effective against Juventus in 99 was also because he was more physical than Zidane and Davids? I wish you had been around earlier, we would have made a fortune- "The key to stopping World class midfielders" - Run around like a mad dog and be more aggressive than them. I guess Xavi and Iniesta and Pirlo were lucky they never had to face Lee Cattermole, he would have showed them alright.Because Viera had to do more for his team than shielding the defence? Viera needed another player next to him because, like Pogba, he had more to offer going forward and his talent couldn't allow him to only sit back and protect the back 4.
Keane is the typical British midfielder, less talented but a lot of aggressiveness and energy to run around like a mad dog. Those type of players look great under a well oiled team where their lack of skills are covered by other creative players (see Milner at Liverpool) , but would struggle under a different set up where their flaws would get exposed (Henderson when Liverpool struggle).
When they faced, Keane looked good because his game (most of the time our games against Wenger Arsenal) consisted on kicking the shite out of them, a physical game to compensate from the difference of talent between the two teams. Keane was more physical than Viera, reason why he was more effective in those games.
Explain yourself. It seems that leadership is more valued on here than talent. Watching Kane and Viera you'd think that it was obvious who was the better player between the two, but not in the view of some people.
Great leader Keane, good tackler, decent passer, but that's kind of it. He doesn't posses even a quarter of Paul's technical abilities.
Dunno why I feel that most people overrate Keane just because he was a leader.
No he was superb in that one game. Nobody can deny it, I'm talking about the ensemble of his career.I suppose the reason he was so effective against Juventus in 99 was also because he was more physical than Zidane and Davids? I wish you had been around earlier, we would have made a fortune- "The key to stopping World class midfielders" - Run around like a mad dog and be more aggressive than them. I guess Xavi and Iniesta and Pirlo were lucky they never had to face Lee Cattermole, he would have showed them alright.
Ignorance is nothing to be proud of.It happens with only United fans and British fans. No one outside that circle sees him as one of the best midfielders.
Mate just stop. You're having a mare. Either you've not seen Keane much or you simply don't understand football all that well. Either way its time to stop.No he was superb in that one game. Nobody can deny it, I'm talking about the ensemble of his career.
And I'm comparing Keane with Milner or Henderson, I'm only pointing the type of player he was.
Keane benefited from playing for a winning team managed by a great manager, and played more than 12 years for us, put Pogba in the same conditions and wait for a decade to judge him.I think it is you who needs to explain yourself - Keane proved himself to be one of the very best and most influential midfielders for Utd in the modern era. Pogba hasn't done anything yet to deserve him being compared with the likes of Keane in a Utd shirt.