Grylte
"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,190
Have Rashford and Bruno been mentioned yet?
There can quite obviously only be two answers. Rashford is probably the right answer but Bruno for me would send the better signal, seeing as you’ll simply never play controlled possession football while having an agent of chaos as your playmaker. Bruno is a good player but we need to move on from him.
Where have you got the idea of punishment from? Going in a different direction is not a punishment or it certainly doesn't have to be framed that way.The idea of a "statement sale" would be just as indicitive of the psychodrama United have been caught in as any of the "statement signings" of the previous regime.
Selling a player primarily to punish them and teach everyone else a lesson would not be putting down a marker for a more strategic and intelligent football operation because strategic and intelligent football operations don't run on fan forum logic.
Ooo, keep going with that dirty talk!!Selling Mainoo to Liverpool would be quite the statement.
It’s just another bash Rashford thread because they were getting bored of the 20-odd live threads we already have on that subject…Yeah I've never heard of a club making a statement sale.
The displays of myopia when people hone in on a player or two as if everyone else even cares enough to do so, are incredible.It’s just another bash Rashford thread because they were getting bored of the 20-odd live threads we already have on that subject…
Sell Sancho, buy him again, and sell him once more.Indicative of true change and a new era of zero tolerance and desire to move in a different direction to what we've been mired in for years now?
Main difference in my opinion is that Portugal has calm and controlled passers throughout the pitch, while United have players who panic under pressure constantly. I'd say only a few players keep calm under pressure and can recycle possession well. Most of our attackers can't, Scotty can't, Case doesn't/can't, most of our defenders can't (Maguire, Varane, AWB)... in a squad that can keep the ball well, it's good to have a risk taker. In a team full of risk takers (due to lack of ability?), another risk taker might tip the balance to getting this gung ho stuff we're seeing."Controlled possession football"? You mean like Portugal does?
Where have you got the idea of punishment from? Going in a different direction is not a punishment or it certainly doesn't have to be framed that way.
The fans may be emotionally attached, it doesn't mean the decision is made along those lines.
A club making it clear it will no longer be run in a certain way can send a marker to players inside the club as well as those entering after the fact so too with agents and their approach.
Players bought or sold who were upper bracket when it comes to valuation cannot help but be part of "psychodrama" as you put it.
- Moving on a potential £100m asset this summer because of principles and moral obligation would be a huge statement. Not many clubs would entertain it, imo.
- Selling a marquee player who crossed the manager is a huge statement. The consequences for doing so then being set in stone with grey area removed.
- Moving on the golden boy and head of our advertising who seems to have stopped working for the team and has been deemed practically untouchable this season, would send shockwaves through the club and the support. The business aspects can be sound, but it doesn’t mean it would not be a seriously emotive sale.
The list goes on as there are a fair few others at the club whose sale would make waves.