I wouldn't take it away from the players. It wasn't their responsibility to keep City's accounts straight. Any questions as to how impressive their achievement was relative to the squad available was always there. They should keep their winners medals whatever the outcome.
Same with the manager, though if their pay check is being garnished its probably clear things aren't all above board. Playing with a stacked deck isn't exactly sporting
I wouldn't go picking through the past. The poll elsewhere has a preference for them being voided as opposed to passed on and its on a fan site of the club who stands to benefit most. Its a massive can of worms if you start looking at relegated clubs results against them and european qualification. Its done, they benefited, everyone else lost out to some extent.
I dont really know how i feel about it at this point. So many of them cups and leagues were won by such fine margins. Having a relatively good back up keeper is the kind of stupid, tiny detail that could have swung things against them. The number and range of charges kind of suggest they were benefiting to the tune of more than a slightly better keeper, so it raises the question, what if? The asterisk is already there now really. Which has damaged the wider league when its taken them 15 years to catch up. I guess I already knew (or thought it was obvious), just feels weird to have it confirmed in a way.
I dont even know if i actually support FFP. I just dont think you can have clubs decide which rules they're going to follow.
Football is in a very weird spot at the moment.