What is a good result at Anfield?

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
17,290
Honestly, if I was offered a 2-0 defeat next week. I'd take it now. My heart can't handle another tonking to those cnuts. With the way we've been playing recently, it's looking more and more likely. Pack the fecking midfield instead of leaving it empty as our Supreme Leader likes it. Hell, park the bus with two banks of 5 if you need to.
 
I’d take 4-0 to them. Honestly.
 
3-0 with ratcliffe running onto the pitch and tearing ETH's contract in his face.

WWE Style
 
If you refuse to play don’t you just get a default 3 - 0 loss?
 
If you refuse to play don’t you just get a default 3 - 0 loss?
Deducted at least one point too. Might be worth it if it means they don't get another go at the high score.
 
The fact we'd all see a 1-0 loss to our fircest rivals as a good result is enough evidence to prove the manager must go
 
If we continue with this one midfielder nonsense it could be worse than last year.
 
If our fanbase gets the game called off, it'll be the only useful they'll have done for this club in the last 10 years.
 
Under Hag? Anything under 4 goals
 
A loss by 3 goals or less is as good as can hope for, another complete capitulation is most likely outcome though.
 
We're as pathetic as the team.
 
This thread tells you all you need to know about where we as a club.
 
Now Bruno is suspended.
What an embarressment as a captain. Liverpool will not have to try hard to win.
 
Probably best off just not showing up and giving them 0-3 at this point. Christ, we’re hopeless.
 
I said after beating Chelsea that I'd take a narrow defeat as long as the team tried. Given them trying is unlikely, they're probably going to win by at least 3.

The fact we'd all see a 1-0 loss to our fircest rivals as a good result is enough evidence to prove the manager must go

It isn't proof of that. It's proof this team is awful, not necessarily the manager.
 
I said after beating Chelsea that I'd take a narrow defeat as long as the team tried. Given them trying is unlikely, they're probably going to win by at least 3.



It isn't proof of that. It's proof this team is awful, not necessarily the manager.
The manager is responsible for the team being awful