Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,791
One bad run of form is enough to get a manager sacked for a shiny new toy.
It wasn't even a - say - standard bad run. There's a context there which his most vocal critics just refuse to acknowledge. Ole didn't implement a system that worked initially (in a honeymoon phase) only to break down spectacularly later on. If that had been the case, it would have been extremely worrying indeed. But it wasn't the case.
Two things happened: he changed his approach (because of injuries, fatigue and the players simply not being prepped for a high intensity approach) - and he was made permanent manager (which may have influenced the players, or some of them, negatively). The former wasn't a very good call on his part in hindsight, the latter wasn't a very good call on Ed's part (again in hindsight, and provided we're looking at what might have been a smarter short term move).
Bottom line is that we haven't seen his preferred system implemented properly yet. The shite run is obviously still partly on him, he clearly could have done better, but it wasn't how he wanted to go about it. It was a pragmatic solution to an objectively very tricky run of fixtures (and a generally very tricky situation to find oneself in for a newly appointed manager).