But none of that is illegal so it's good actually.It'll join support for PR, nationalisation of water & energy, private interests to be removed from the NHS and sanctions placed on brutal regimes from the last few conferences in the bin.
But none of that is illegal so it's good actually.It'll join support for PR, nationalisation of water & energy, private interests to be removed from the NHS and sanctions placed on brutal regimes from the last few conferences in the bin.
But this isn’t illegal
I don't have a problem with a family friend (and longstanding Labour insider/peer) letting Starmer's son stay in his house during GCSEs and a nominal £20k being put on the value of that for parliamentary accounting purposes. Presumably it was the 13th July because if the election was on the 4th July, it'd take a couple of weeks to move into Downing Street, so might as well stay there.If the last GCSE was on 19 June why did he need to stay until 13 July? What disruption was he avoiding there?
Why is the rich bloke letting Starmer stay at his gaff? Why is the rich bloke kitting Starmer and his wife out in expensive clothes?
I refuse to believe you're this dumb.
Is this the same "Starver" who has just introduced breakfast clubs in all primary schools?The winter fuel payment cut has been voted down at the Labour conference, let's see if Starver actually gives a feck about democracy (he doesn't).
A small point, but I didn't want him to bring his family into it. The accommodation was being used for the election, and I think they could have just said that. My issue is whoever is controlling his media strategy at the moment. They are doing a very bad job.They didn’t say solely.
Honestly, it’s nothing. It was written about at the time. It made sense.
That you wish a father to publicly say ‘I’m doing this for my son’ and heap additional pressure on the lad is just daft.
More to the point, the genuine reason might have been “The right wing gutter press do my Fcuking head in and I’m sick of the sight of them, and want to punch them when they stand on my doorstep every morning when my kids go to school”.
It’s so boring. So utterly boring. All these column inches. None of them dedicated to actual change. Eyes on the prize people.
If the budget is disgusting, I’ll tear him and the party to pieces along with everyone else. For now, I just don’t care.
Is this the same "Starver" who has just introduced breakfast clubs in all primary schools?
If you look at each gift in isolation I'm sure you can rationalise them as not leading to any conflicts of interest.I don't have a problem with a family friend (and longstanding Labour insider/peer) letting Starmer's son stay in his house during GCSEs and a nominal £20k being put on the value of that for parliamentary accounting purposes. Presumably it was the 13th July because if the election was on the 4th July, it'd take a couple of weeks to move into Downing Street, so might as well stay there.
The above feels different to gifts being handed out that could lead to a conflict of interest, and I think broadly the same rules that apply to the rest of us in work under the Bribery Act, should also apply to MPs. (I also think the PM should be paid a lot more, all things being equal.)
I warned of the same in the Starmer thread when he was in opposition.Its probably worth reminding ourselves, especially those who think that this looking bad isn't really a problem, is that if the 'they are all the same' sticks, and it will, then the electorate, most of whom pay no attention to politics outside of what appears on BBC news headlines, will look for something else next election.
That won't be the greens, it won't be whatever corbyn creates, it will be farage. Because his is the only party the media itself presents as an outsider (even when they are no such thing).
I said before the election, starmer presenting himself under the banner of the left, doing awful stuff that the tories would be proud of, leads to farage as PM in 2029.
It will likely be a reform/tory coalition, but I'm more sure than ever its coming now.
If you look at each gift in isolation I'm sure you can rationalise them as not leading to any conflicts of interest.
When you look at it all together I don't know how you can still think that.
A very bad job, consistently. Not what I expected as in other ways he's been very professional as a politician. I assume staff changes will take place.A small point, but I didn't want him to bring his family into it. The accommodation was being used for the election, and I think they could have just said that. My issue is whoever is controlling his media strategy at the moment. They are doing a very bad job.
Is there a limit as to what can be gifted? For everybody not just Starmer, the Tories or anyone.
Just declaring it is a nonsense. If it's £20, £20k or £20 million - is there no accountability?
Starmer's advisers must be complete morons.
Depends on the volume really, and if there’s an active work element to it.
I think a government full of people that routinely got free tickets to;
-A football match
Our country would be in a better place.
Whilst keeping the 2 child benefit cap. Got any details about these breakfast clubs? I'd love to see if the policy is as good as it sounds.Is this the same "Starver" who has just introduced breakfast clubs in all primary schools?
Personally, I wouldn’t take it. I wouldn’t want them to take it.
So the story is true then. Glad you agree.CK Hutchison Holdings owns 75 per cent of Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, the owner of Northumbrian Water.”
Absolute meltiest comeback. Bravo lad. He went as a guest of a Telecomms company. That’s owned by a holding company. That holding company owns 75% of a water company he’s probably never heard of, on the Scottish border.
Take a bow after you’ve stopped guzzling the dirty jizz that the right wing media’s cock has expunged in your vague direction.
Whilst keeping the 2 child benefit cap. Got any details about these breakfast clubs? I'd love to see if the policy is as good as it sounds.
Context matters. It’s not nefarious until it is.
Personally, I wouldn’t take it. I wouldn’t want them to take it.
But also… it’s the Fcuking Telegraph. ‘Bosses linked to’. Give it the ol’ thumbs up if you like, But provide some details. Was he a shareholder? A board member? No.
“Steve Reed, the MP for Streatham and Croydon North, attended a Chelsea v Crystal Palace football match at the invitation of Hutchison 3G UK Limited, which is ultimately wholly owned by CK Hutchison Holdings.
CK Hutchison Holdings owns 75 per cent of Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, the owner of Northumbrian Water.”
Absolute meltiest comeback. Bravo lad. He went as a guest of a Telecomms company. That’s owned by a holding company. That holding company owns 75% of a water company he’s probably never heard of, on the Scottish border.
Take a bow after you’ve stopped guzzling the dirty jizz that the right wing media’s cock has expunged in your vague direction.
Honestly. This is why we Fcuking lose all the time. Sanctimonious b0llocks with no sense of perspective. Even when we won we can’t accept it. Get a grip.
If anything really dodgy ever comes out about him, it puts a lot of people in very awkward, potentially compromised positions. Which is the point
I don’t think he gets it
My guess is they are trying to make Starmer relatable/sympathetic but I don’t think they could of picked a more awful line.Which idiot in HQ has decided "let's defend the fact that someone gave us a London pad to use for election purposes for two months by focusing on the fact your son was doing some revision there"?
Damned if they feed starving kids, damned if they don't.Well no other PM in living memory has introduced this.
This is the 'improvement' we've discussed previously.
Added to that Labour were aggressively briefing the media that his kids would be off limit if he was elected. This is basically a red rag to the media bull.My guess is they are trying to make Starmer relatable/sympathetic but I don’t think they could of picked a more awful line.
1)Its just not very believable(Then added in that the dates don’t line up)
2)At the very least Starmer has wanted to become PM since 2019. So acting shocked about the media pressure in 2024 is clearly bollocks.
3)Trying to come across as the common man while talking about renting out a penthouse isn’t a workable position.
Pure shit show.
Yep he has pretty much given the media the green light. Which sucks for Starmer family.Added to that Labour were aggressively briefing the media that his kids would be off limit if he was elected. This is basically a red rag to the media bull.
It's mental. The level of entitlement is insane.The stand out of all these conversations is that for them, not just starmer, its the same with all of them, the only options are take the gift or do without.
The option to pay for it themselves never exists in their world. Which tells you just how used to others paying for everything they are.