Antisocial
Has a Sony home cinema
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,850
Not this shit again.
This.
Not this shit again.
"I've just felt that it was close, yes. We have held several talks. Why they dropped out, I do not know exactly."
He blew his chance to become a legend here. Not we are after now either
Legends need to start more than 14 league games in a season. The guy is a crock, thank Christ he thought he was worth 200k a week.
The crock factor is a bit overrated. He's averaged 25 games or so in the league and 36 in all comps.
I'd take him only if he came with a holding player. For he'd over work Carrick meaning Carrick would need serious cover.
Average from when?
We are talking about starts. 25 in the league is not enough for a key player at the top of the wage bill anyway, 65% of games?
Wrong. It would mean we'd need reliable back up for Carrick. For he wouldn't be able to survive carrying him for a whole season the way he has done with Scholes this year.Which means a massive change in formation just to accommodate him,....
Average from when?
We are talking about starts. 25 in the league is not enough for a key player at the top of the wage bill anyway, 65% of games?
From his time at Inter.
Its impossible to predict how many starts he would get in the future. Therefore, the injury factor is not a particular valid argument against buying him. A 200k/wk wage bill speaks far more negatively than his fitness.
I have 24, 22 and 14 league starts for his three seasons in Italy. That is an average of 20 a season, which is a depressing 53%. His highest at 64% and his lowest at 37%.
Are you seriously telling me that you think he is worthy of topping our wage bill?
I have 24, 22 and 14 league starts for his three seasons in Italy. That is an average of 20 a season, which is a depressing 53%. His highest at 64% and his lowest at 37%.
Are you seriously telling me that you think he is worthy of topping our wage bill?
edit
That is clutching at straw Raul, you can make a prediction on the future measured from relevant past events. He has only once made more than 30 league starts in his career and that was in 2006/07 when he made 31 for Ajax.
I reiterate that I believe this player to be unworthy of topping our wage bill.
Wiki has it at 26,25,20 league appearances.
Have I suggested we should top our wage bill ?
---------- Rooney ----------
Valencia Hummels Vidic Evra
----------- Carrick ---------
Sneijder Kagawa Hazard
---------- Welbeck ---------
Those are apps I am talking about starts. key players come off the bench when they are coming back from injury. He would top our wage bill without question, he would require 180k in line with Rooney, as he was offered last year, only he wanted 200k.
I believe starts to be the relevant figure for players at the top end of the wage bill, as by defintion they should be starting every game that they are available for.
You can't predict the future, no one can, so nots waste one anothers time pretending its a legitimate point of discussion.
If he was injured for various parts of the year then appearances are a more relevant stat than just starts. Only using starts renders him invisible in situations when he was brought on as a sub.