fastwalker
Full Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
- Messages
- 417
I heard Rueben Amorim's press conference earlier and he mentioned "we are starving for leaders on the pitch". I am stunned that none of the journalists pressed him on this. However, the more I thought about it, the more I realised just how damning an indictment it is and just what it reveals about the problems at United.
I am mindful that English is not Amorim's first language and he may have exaggerated to make a point. But even so, he is clearly not a stupid man and must understand the weight that words carry. Think about it, he did not say 'we need leaders' or that 'we need more leaders' or even that 'we need to show more leadership'. He said 'we are starving for leaders'. Effectively what Amorim is saying that there is hardly anyone on the pitch who sets examples for others, is prepared to take responsibility, is accountable for their actions, is willing to take the initiative, will sacrifice for the cause. Basically, no one gives a s**t. It is an incredible thing for a manager/ coach to say publicly about their players. Amorim is telling us exactly what he thinks of the current United team.
If he feels the need to say this publicly, what must he have seen privately?
I am mindful that English is not Amorim's first language and he may have exaggerated to make a point. But even so, he is clearly not a stupid man and must understand the weight that words carry. Think about it, he did not say 'we need leaders' or that 'we need more leaders' or even that 'we need to show more leadership'. He said 'we are starving for leaders'. Effectively what Amorim is saying that there is hardly anyone on the pitch who sets examples for others, is prepared to take responsibility, is accountable for their actions, is willing to take the initiative, will sacrifice for the cause. Basically, no one gives a s**t. It is an incredible thing for a manager/ coach to say publicly about their players. Amorim is telling us exactly what he thinks of the current United team.
If he feels the need to say this publicly, what must he have seen privately?