Tiber
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,432
Could have signed Kane, didn't even try
Could have signed Kane, didn't even try
Yes we didCould have signed Kane, didn't even try
I agree - we have no actual build up. We also seem to lose the ball/give the ball away more than any team I have ever seen.I can't explain it succinctly, but...it feels like we're trying to fluke goals. The general idea is get the ball in midfield and hope that something happens somewhere that eventually leads to a goal. We don't seem to naturally attack the opposition in the same way that other teams do it. There's no fluidity to it. The football doesn't look pretty and it doesn't result in goals. It's the worst of both worlds.
This for me is the issue!
United should have been ahead against Spurs. Which in turn makes the game easy to play as Spurs would need to over commit.
Hopefully Martial can play soon because he is the only one who can hold up the ball.
I know it apparently makes me a dinosaur but signing a keeper to transform the team into an attacking force was at best, never going to be a short fix.
Behave. It's pretty obvious we'd have gone there but Levy wouldn't have it.
I've been looking for the xG stats myself, 4.2 with one goal is absolutely shocking but sounds about right. One positive I suppose is that Onana has been a clear upgrade at least so far. The other is that eventually they do even out to SOME extent. But it's bad JuJu even at the start of a season we deserve to see progress in.Ludicrously small sample size obviously, but it's 1 goal from 4.2 xG across the first two games.
Which usually you'd point to as a sort-of positive, because you could simply say we've been a bit unlucky in terms of finishing and could have easily got more from those games. It's certainly better that we created those chances and didn't take them rather than not create them at all.
In a context where around 65% of our squad underperformed their xG last season though, it's definitely frustrating. Generally you'd expect it not to last and for them to start converting better through sheer variance, any day now...
That would be fine if this was a one off occurrence and wasn't a long term issue.. We just don't have enough players who can be trusted in front of goal.On another day we had 3 goals yesterday.
1. The penalty.
2. The biggest sitter from Bruno with that header.
3. The shot against the post from Anthony.
We have had a terrible start but it’s not the crises that so many are making out. Let the window close first.
Chance creation wasn't a huge issue last season. Arsenal only had 4.61 xG more than United over the course of the season (and that was entirely from pens and corners, open play xG was the same). They scored 15% above their xG, we scored 19% below our xG.It’s only two games in but I’ve just read that only Brighton and Newcastle have created more big chances in front of goal than United. The difference, obviously, is that they’ve put some of theirs away. So hopefully somehting to be a little positive about.
He was not on sale to United. We were made pretty clear on that very early.Could have signed Kane, didn't even try
One would think we want to compete with City/Arsenal/Newcastle and not Spurs/Chelsea. At least keep our ambitions high.We are going to be saying the same about a lot of teams I think. Chelsea are in the exact same position, I think Spurs will ultimately lack goals this season, Liverpool are still waiting on Darwin to take the next step.
There is only one world class striker in the league and it shows. There are going to be a hell of a lot of games like the United/Spurs and Chelsea/West Ham games this season, if teams can't generate goals in line with the amount of chances they are creating.
We just have to hope Hojlund is ready for the step up basically immediately.
Yeah good post. It’s clearer more than ever. It could be a loooong season for usChance creation wasn't a huge issue last season. Arsenal only had 4.61 xG more than United over the course of the season (and that was entirely from pens and corners, open play xG was the same). They scored 15% above their xG, we scored 19% below our xG.
Actually even going on the teams who had more xG than us last season, here are their open play xG's:
Fix our chance conversion. Fix our set pieces. Because that's where the biggest difference lies in our attacking stats between us and the others.
- City - 64.9 (84.32 total)
- Liverpool - 62.71 (80.77 total)
- Brighton - 65.61 (77.72 total)
- Newcastle - 52.52 (76.98 total)
- Arsenal - 63.94 (76.51 total)
- United - 63.09 (71.90 total)
Edit: Actually also looking at our defensive numbers, open play is right there with Newcastle and Arsenal, but our set piece defending drags us way down. City is clear at the top defensively though.
Until an hour ago, I, along with the United hierarchy, were assuming that we would have a 20 goal a season contribution coming from the right wing. Now with the back-tracking news that Greenwood is not coming back, we need another striker before the season starts (which we needed anyway), and an upgrade on Antony for a truly world class right winger. Orban would be an exciting striker as an alternative to Hojlund. We are fine with Rashford and Garnacho on the left, but there is a massive dearth of great right wingers. There is a guy at Arsenal who is ok, but who are the world class right wingers??? Most of the good wingers seem to play on the left.
One would think we want to compete with City/Arsenal/Newcastle and not Spurs/Chelsea. At least keep our ambitions high.
It’s baffling we spent £100m on Onana and Mount when we clearly needed goals.