WC All Stars Chain Draft QF - Arbitrium vs Tuppet

with players at indicated WC peaks, who will win the match?


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
Can somebody comment on how Ocwirk compares in an All-Time context? As far as I'm concerned, the likes of Varela and Neeskens put in some of the best midfield performances ever, respective to their roles.

From what I understand he is the reason Austria were so good in 54. Nothing in comparison to Neeskens or Varela though.
 
Can somebody comment on how Ocwirk compares in an All-Time context? As far as I'm concerned, the likes of Varela and Neeskens put in some of the best midfield performances ever, respective to their roles.
Maybe someone else would have better insight, for now here's a post -

Four renown football experts each compiled their own selection for Germany`s "Kicker" football magazine. They were Dr. Friedebert Becker, Dr. Willy Meisl, Dr. Paul Tröger and Dr. Fritz Weilenmann. From their selections, Kicker compiled the "definitive" World selection 1954.


Dr. Friedebert Becker`s Teams:

Team A:

----------Czibor-----------Hidegkuti----------Julinho

-------------------Kocsis------------Puskas

-------------------Ocwirk------------Bozsik

--------Andrade-------------Wright------------D.Santos

-----------------------------Turgay


Team B:


----------Schäfer-----------Hügi-----------Klodt

------------------Schiaffino-----------F.Walter

------------------Cajkovski------------Eckel

--------Crnkovic------------Horvath------------Stankovic

-----------------------------Beara

His commentary:
"The best players were the linkmen. The two Hungarians Puskas and Kocsis, the Uruguayan Schiaffino and our own Fritz Walter can only be chosen according to the alphabet, for who would want to favour any of them? Even Maxl Morlock is approaching these world class players, in terms of shooting accuracy, he can take on even goal champion Kocsis! Wings didn`t shine as brightly as they did in 1934 (Lehner, Orsi, Puc, Guaita), but Schäfer and the Bernie Klodt of the Turkey match can be compared with any of the Greats from Overseas or central Europe. But the best winger of this tournament was without a doubt the Brazilian Julinho."


Dr. Willy Meisl`s Teams:

Team A:

----------Czibor-----------Hidegkuti----------Julinho

----------------Schiaffino------------F.Walter

-------------------Andrade------------Cajkovski

---------Neury-------------Wright------------D.Santos

-----------------------------Grosics


Team B:


----------Schäfer-----------Stojaspal----------Matthews

-------------------Kocsis--------------Puskas

------------------Ocwirk--------------Bozsik

------no player named-------Lorant------------Lantos

-----------------------------Parlier

His commentary:
"The best player? This is an unanswerable question. One could at best try to classify groups of players. But if I have to answer: number 1 was the bearer of a name of a player who already once before overshadowed every other player at a World Cup: Andrade is the complete footballer, a real 'black diamond'. Technically completed, an athlete and sportsman from head to toe, tactically, a football pitch-marshall. He is equally perfect at passing and taking balls, in destruction as in built-up."


Dr. Paul Tröger`s Teams:

Team A

---Schäfer-----Hidegkuti------Budai II

----------Kocsis--------F.Walter

----------Ocwirk--------Bozsik

------Andrade----Liebrich----Kohlmeyer

-----------------Turgay

He didn`t list enough players for a second team. The players he listed additionally were: Grosics (goalie), Horvath (stopper), Eckel (half), Schiaffino (linkman), Hügi (centre forward).

His commentary:
"Kocsis' inimitable way of scoring headers was the most impressive thing for me. He was the most dangerous forward of the tournament (Morlock was close in terms of jumping power as well as in the exactness of his heading). Uruguay`s Schiaffino (even if Milan just paid 300,000 Marks to Penarol) does not just reach him (maybe because he`s missing the accompanying players). Best strategic: Fritz Walter, who literally hypnotized his accompanying players, to act according to his ideas. Best performance in terms of defence: Liebrich in Geneva and Basel (despite Uruguay`s giant Santamaria, despite the self-sacrificing Neury). No goalie was outstanding. Decisive however were: Turek against Yugoslavia in the positive, Merrick (England vs. Uruguay) in the negative."


Dr. Fritz Weilenmann`s Teams are a bit too complicated to put into a tactical scheme. I will just quote what he said about his selections plus the general comment.

Goal: Beara, Turgay, Turek
Full Backs pair: Crnkovic-Stankovic
Left Full Back: Kohlmeyer
Right Full Back: Neury (he remarks that he unfortunately didn`t see D.Santos play)
Stopper: Liebrich, closely ahead of Horvath (he remarks that he didn`t see Wright play)
Halves pair: three almost equal pairs, Bozsik-Zakarias, Ocwirk-Koller & Cajkovski-Boskov.
Single half: Eckel (he remarks that Uruguay`s Andrade does not exactly belong into this position, but he wants to call him "the king of the classical outside-marking half backs")
Outside Right: Julinho, Milutinovic
Outside Left: Schäfer, Zebec, Czibor
Inside forwards/linkmen: F.Walter, Kocsis, Puskas (all equal), then Schiaffino
Centre forwards: Hügi (as executor), Hidegkuti (as "thinking" player), Stojaspal (as "gapless commuter").

His commentary:
"The best attack? The Hungarians, but closely followed by the Germans. Only the inside forward trio of Kocsis-Hidegkuti-Puskas outdid the German inside trio Morlock-O.Walter-F.Walter (from the 6-1 bashing of Austria). Kocsis is just unstoppable! Puskas is equalled by F.Walter as a selfless teamplayer and strategic. The best outside forwards: at the right doubtlessly Brazil`s Julinho, at the left Schäfer despite Czibor."


From the selections of these four gentlemen, Kicker magazine then went on to compile the 1954 "World XI".

Goal: Beara
Full Backs: D.Santos, Kohlmeyer or Crnkovic
Stopper: Wright
Halves: Ocwirk or Cajkovski or Bozsik (who would want to decide between them?)
Outside forwards: Julinho, Czibor or Schäfer
Inside forwards: Kocsis, F.Walter, Puskas or Schiaffino.
 
You can only judge my full backs on the WC in question and Maicon was just fine attacking in 2010 hence his inclusion in the all star team.

And as far as Maradona goes, I’m holding the best card possible in this context to stop him. One of the best captains ever, who led his country to glory against Brazil in their own back yard, and one of if not the best DM in international history. I have tardelli and Neeskens able to help out at times too. This is as good as it gets to limit Maradonas Effectiveness on a game.

Agreed regarding the Maradona part. If your attack was sorted out, it would probably be much more closer.
 
Agreed regarding the Maradona part. If your attack was sorted out, it would probably be much more closer.

I don’t think it needs as much sorting out as you suggest. Those versions of Pele and Kocsis have joy against anyone. And Hagi with that kind of quality around him in the Romania side goes from WC all star to potential WC winner.
 
Maybe someone else would have better insight, for now here's a post -

Cheers, great insight that. I really liked the parts about Schiaffino and Andrade. Those two were known from the 1950 edition, but no big stars in Europe like the Hungarians so nice to see the German pundits giving them big praise. I also have to read up about Julinho now, he is nowhere to be seen in this draft.

From what I could gather, Ocwirk was seen as the second best midfielder after Bozsik. Sadly, there was no comment about his performance. I am still torn about how to rate him against other All-Time greats.
 
Cheers, great insight that. I really liked the parts about Schiaffino and Andrade. Those two were known from the 1950 edition, but no big stars in Europe like the Hungarians so nice to see the German pundits giving them big praise. I also have to read up about Julinho now, he is nowhere to be seen in this draft.

From what I could gather, Ocwirk was seen as the second best midfielder after Bozsik. Sadly, there was no comment about his performance. I am still torn about how to rate him against other All-Time greats.

Consider it like this. In order to accommodate Facchetti, tuppet had to drop Gerson who was known as the brain behind the 1970 Brazil squad. Gersons WC was better than Facchettis, and facchettis was probably better than ocwirks. So in the context of this draft, there’s a better WC performer than him on the bench.
 
@idmanager



Where would your vote have gone then? Wouldn’t there still be the same issue with Kocsis?

Swap tardelli and Neeskens
 
Consider it like this. In order to accommodate Facchetti, tuppet had to drop Gerson who was known as the brain behind the 1970 Brazil squad. Gersons WC was better than Facchettis, and facchettis was probably better than ocwirks. So in the context of this draft, there’s a better WC performer than him on the bench.
Its not just the world cup performance though but more of a tactical thing. I didn't drop Gerson to fit Facchetti, I got Facchetti after I had decided to drop Gerson since I already got Maradona. Once you get Maradona 86 you want him as the primary playmaker and Gerson's playmaking is not that important to the side. Ocwirk offers better defensive protection and more mobility in general, while losing some of the playmaking. He just fits better in the team.

As for good WC performance sitting on bench you don't have to look farther than Zico, who sadly had to be sacrificed to get the best possible out of Maradona.
 
@idmanager



Where would your vote have gone then? Wouldn’t there still be the same issue with Kocsis?

Swap tardelli and Neeskens

I already said I don't mind Kocsis mate. I have seen managers (@Lord SInister ) win drafts with him in the same formation with these same voters. Better wingbacks attacking wise would have made it perfect though. Especially when Pele has a great header in him as well.

That midfield 4 would have made it very difficult for me to vote against you.
 
Its not just the world cup performance though but more of a tactical thing. I didn't drop Gerson to fit Facchetti, I got Facchetti after I had decided to drop Gerson since I already got Maradona. Once you get Maradona 86 you want him as the primary playmaker and Gerson's playmaking is not that important to the side. Ocwirk offers better defensive protection and more mobility in general, while losing some of the playmaking. He just fits better in the team.

As for good WC performance sitting on bench you don't have to look farther than Zico, who sadly had to be sacrificed to get the best possible out of Maradona.

Yeah I wondered if you would keep 4 at the back and shove Zico where I put Hagi In my last game. Think your attack looks better for it, although a little extra distraction for my midfield might not have been the worst thing.
 
I already said I don't mind Kocsis mate. I have seen managers (@Lord SInister ) win drafts with him in the same formation with these same voters. Better wingbacks attacking wise would have made it perfect though. Especially when Pele has a great header in him as well.

That midfield 4 would have made it very difficult for me to vote against you.

Yeah I just felt that as a three and staying true to World Cup form, the lineup I went for made more sense. Both potential front 3’s scored 20 goals between them, and I made the trump card the fact that I could play 3 all stars.
 
I did feel lizarazu was unfairly floated over thanks to the promotability of Roberto Carlos (remember the Nike commercials at the time :drool:)

Don't try dumping on my Bobby Carlos!
 
Does anyone have anything that shows how many assists Pele had in 58? I can only make out one from any of the videos I’ve watched but only seen one game.
 
I would have preferred to see Pele at the hub of things in the 10 role, with Hagi playing as the free-roaming attacker pulling wide to serve crosses for Kocsis.

Kudos to Tuppet for keeping Lato on the park - not the sexiest name in a GOATfest but his WC credentials are second to none.
 
I would have preferred to see Pele at the hub of things in the 10 role, with Hagi playing as the free-roaming attacker pulling wide to serve crosses for Kocsis.

Kudos to Tuppet for keeping Lato on the park - not the sexiest name in a GOATfest but his WC credentials are second to none.

I just didn’t know what to do with Hagi when I abandoned 4231. Tried to keep the players to playing as closed to their position in the relevant WC’s
 
Substitution

1994 Hagi replaced by 1986 careca (5 goals at that WC)

Careca moves up front, 58 Pele ages 12 years and reverts to 1970 Pele as a pure number 10 at the tip of what is almost the perfect diamond.
 
Those lists !!

Bleacher report listed Ronaldo 2002 as the best ever performance and doesn't even have Garrincha 62. Sportsbreak list Garrincha as 10th best performance behind hurst and zenga. I don't really expect much from bleacher report but those lists are horrendous. Getting Pele and not using 1970s world cup just seem wrong to me.
Reminded me of the one from 4-4-2 that I've seen just yesterday

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/ranked-25-best-world-cup-players-ever?page=0,2

Klose 3rd, Cafu 6th, Yashin is the only keeper in the list (okay, this is not that outlandish) and Milla and Lineker as the final touch. No Charlton, no Didi, no Djalma...
 
@Arbitrium If the game started like this i wouldnt have voted in this game.

That’s okay, I’d just like some discussion Instead of talking to myself, it’s a fascinating match up and it’s a World Cup draft with now arguably the two best individual World Cup performances in history on the field.
 
Reminded me of the one from 4-4-2 that I've seen just yesterday

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/ranked-25-best-world-cup-players-ever?page=0,2

Klose 3rd, Cafu 6th, Yashin is the only keeper in the list (okay, this is not that outlandish) and Milla and Lineker as the final touch. No Charlton, no Didi, no Djalma...

Yeah like all lists they are mega subjective.

I watched a tv show here yesterday with the top 50 goals of season 17/18 across Europe.

This was number 1



Ronaldo v Juventus was #8
 
Reminded me of the one from 4-4-2 that I've seen just yesterday

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/ranked-25-best-world-cup-players-ever?page=0,2

Klose 3rd, Cafu 6th, Yashin is the only keeper in the list (okay, this is not that outlandish) and Milla and Lineker as the final touch. No Charlton, no Didi, no Djalma...
Which would you consider his best world cup ? I remember you mentioning in a previous game that Djalma 62 was too old and got a torrid time from Gento (No shame in that though) and in 58 he only played the final game. I am not sure if he deserves the greatest world cup right back medal thats often pinned on him.
 
Which would you consider his best world cup ? I remember you mentioning in a previous game that Djalma 62 was too old and got a torrid time from Gento (No shame in that though) and in 58 he only played the final game. I am not sure if he deserves the greatest world cup right back medal thats often pinned on him.

Only one player takes that mantle
 
Which would you consider his best world cup ? I remember you mentioning in a previous game that Djalma 62 was too old and got a torrid time from Gento (No shame in that though) and in 58 he only played the final game. I am not sure if he deserves the greatest world cup right back medal thats often pinned on him.
I only watched 1958 final from that World Cup (thankfully there are Didi's and Nilton's compilations from different games already on YouTube), didn't even remember that he missed the rest of the tournament :lol:

Even against Gento you could've seen his defensive quality though. His approach was interesting, very aggressive — he knew that if Gento were to receive the ball running, he is done — so he tried to prevent Gento from getting the ball at all (and obviously a few times that risky tactic backfired, leaving him beaten and Gento running full speed at the free space).
 
Looks like @Arbitrium destroyed his neat frontline to contain Diego, only for the midfield to get bypassed down the flanks.

Inclined to agree with @Tuppet that Kocsis thrived off crosses. In 1954 it was only once Andrade got injured in ET that he chipped in with a brace. Even in a diamond I would have kept Pelé 70 upfront over the 58 one.

But then Tuppet can't spell Schnellinger.
 
Looks like @Arbitrium destroyed his neat frontline to contain Diego, only for the midfield to get bypassed down the flanks.

Inclined to agree with @Tuppet that Kocsis thrived off crosses. In 1954 it was only once Andrade got injured in ET that he chipped in with a brace. Even in a diamond I would have kept Pelé 70 upfront over the 58 one.

But then Tuppet can't spell Schnellinger.

Yeah no issue with any of this, I’m just happy that I ended up with a midfield that could actually do well against Diego, that in itself is an achievement.

There are much better all round teams than mine and I’m keen to see some of the reinforcements.
 
There’s a program on tv just now covering the 74 and 78 World Cup :drool:
 


@Šjor Bepo @idmanager @harshad @ctp @Jim Beam

Won’t tag the rest of the tuppet voters but this is the new formation, mainly so we can actually have 1970 pele v 1986 Maradona
[/QUOTE]

Not that a switch of votes would matter much, but that does look like the best midfield of the draft so far.

As I mentioned in the first game, that defense still doesn't work for me though.

Can't see Passarella getting too much attacking output from this game, while him and Silva is still a very identical pair.
With a Faachetti/Cafu sort of flank, that would have been one of the best and more balanced attacks of the draft as well.

As you mentioned earlier, sometimes reinforcements don't work in your favor.
Maradona-Faachetti vs Varela-Kocsis is never going to be the same.
Lucky that you already had Pele.