Di Maria's angel
Captain of Moanchester United
Scholes was right.
I said I think our play style makes it difficult for him to shine. I think the same about any of our strikers under LVG, whether that be him, RVP, Chicharito, Martial, etc. I didn't say anything about his touch.
So wouldn't you agree Martial has performed better out wide than as a striker?You insinuate that if we played like today every week Rooney would shine. And I don't believe its as simple as that. Martial has been having a much better season than him, and he is getting played here, there and everywhere.
So wouldn't you agree Martial has performed better out wide than as a striker?
I don't think this has been discussed quite enough. What in the blue hell was going on there? It looked like he was wearing someone else's wig.Is he wearing a yarmulke? Something odd with his hair tonight.
It's quite odd. Concurrently off-putting and captivating. He has his natural hair around the sides and back and the artificial puff up front. On the crown of his head, though, he has hair like a coconut.How is he back on pens? He gets to skip Herrera because he was subbed at the weekend?
I don't think this has been discussed quite enough. What in the blue hell was going on there? It looked like he was wearing someone else's wig.
Don't ever do negotiating in real life, if your mind wonders.... Desist
They were not willing to go over £25m. It was wrong decision not to sell him, you can be certain that if Ferguson had stayed, he would have been sold and rightly so. Moyes was too much of a coward to make that decision so instead he gave him an utterly ridiculous 5.5-year contract which is beyond ridiculous.
First off, if we had sold him in the summer of 2013, we would easily have got close to 50M (or very close to that). He had two years still left on his contract and Chelsea, Arsenal and PSG were all looking for a forward. After that it would always have been much less, as we would be seen to be a more desperate party. If he was not sold, it is not Rooney's fault. Its not like he wouldn't have moved out if we wanted to sell him. He couldn't afford to not play with world cup around the corner. We could pocket what we got and gotten rid of the excessive salary. It was clear that Chelsea and PSG would more than match his salary so he would obviously insist on that if he stayed. It was totally in our hands if we didn't want to give him a new contract, or only give him a new contract at a lower salary.
However some people here think that as soon as he turned rubbish he should somehow voluntarily agree to get his salary reduced, even when his contract is until 2019. No player in their right mind will do that. We were foolish to sign the contract, or at least such a long contract, not he.
LvG always the job to whoever scores a penalty. Herrera and Mata were off the pitch on Saturday, so he got the job and scored. Now it is his job again until he misses.How is he back on pens? He gets to skip Herrera because he was subbed at the weekend?
I don't think this has been discussed quite enough. What in the blue hell was going on there? It looked like he was wearing someone else's wig.
I think my point is pretty simple here. Falcao, despite having a relatively better season than Rooney is having was serially beaten with the wages stick all season but when it comes to Wayne Rooney it doesn't apply? It doesn't make sense. You use Young, Mata et al but what we do know is that Rooney openly forced our hands and that is a fact. Like I said, if the club paid him £300k without the nonsense he was on, then fine. He brought this one on himself. I do not treat players differently just because they play for Manchester United.
For every fair criticism that Rooney gets from fans, he gets 10 more crazy support from the media. Only last night another headline read
"In-form Rooney looks to add to tally against Newcastle"
None of them would have given him a 6-year old contract to boot. And I very much doubt anyone would pay him that much or give United the fee you're talking about. PSG had Zlatan at the time already and were signing Cavani (or didn't they sign him a year before?). You're having a laugh if you think Arsenal would offer him such wages.
No one has suggested that he should take a pay cut, just that he's not been performing as he should be given his status within the club and enormous wage he's on.
That's a fair point but status is only really based on past performances and the years he has spent with us and being involved in winning trophies. No one in their right mind should have expected a 30 year Rooney to match the past performances. Also if wage is a yardstick, hardly anyone is justifying their wages. For me earning 'only 150k' is not an excuse to play badly compared to someone who is earning '250k'. As I said earlier wages take into account a lot more than just the quality of the player. By all means criticize the performances but if we use wage as a stick then to me it somehow sounds like we are saying that as a player you will get less blame if someone earning more is playing gash.
Its really lazy to claim that Falcao was having a relatively better season than Rooney is having now. Even if you take out the last 4 goals that Rooney has scored, he is still on 7 goals for the half season compared to 4 for Falcao for the whole of last season. Never mind the fact that Falcao looked totally out of place in our side when he was not injured. Yes Rooney has been bad this season (and apart from De Gea and Martial, hardly anyone has been much good) but Falcao last season was another level. He was also a player who came to us on loan because Monaco didn't want to pay his wages so he would obviously be beaten with the wage stick more. If he had already stayed 10 years and gave us his best, I am sure people would have been more patient. While we are on Falcao, its worth remembering that he was being paid 265K a week (from wiki) and we also paid a 6 million fee so in total he cost around 380K a week. We all know the return we got for that 380K a week.
How did Rooney force our hands? We had the chance to get a very decent sum on his transfer in 2013 which we didn't take. He was easily getting a better (or at least a similar offer) outside so he would insist on that. It was clearly up to us to not give him a new contract on his terms. We only gave him a new contract because Moyes and Woody thought it made sense (or at least I hope so). In hindsight may be it didn't. Whether we decided to give him 250k, or 300k or 200k or 150k, it would be the same Rooney. The money only shows our perception of what we thought we could give him. It wouldn't turn him into a different player. And yes as a fan you might have felt slightly better that a gash player is only getting 150K (instead of 250K) but nothing else would be different.
That's the problem, if you just watch highlights it looks a great performance, but I can't help feel if we had an aguero/Suarez/Kane he would have scored 4 yesterday. He was 1v1 against coloccini of all people and failed to get passed him! Unless Wayne has runners around him he's unfortunately toothless these days, which suggests we definitely need pace in the team to make him "effective"Only got the highlights of the game.
Looked a totally different player. Here's hoping he can keep this up. Van Gaal's job probably depends on it.
Better, but still a long way to go. There was one moment last night where he was 1 on 1 with the defender (think it was Coloccini, who they'd highlighted before the game as being dreadful at 1 on 1 situations) and he just ran straight into him. He still does that far too often and his touch is still shite. Cracking goal though and looked a lot better than he has done for a while so hopefully this is a turning point.
No, status has to be based on current performances. Respect can be based on past performances. Giggs was in and out of the team, in his last few years, as was proportionate to his performance levels. He was not this guaranteed-to-start Mr. Manchester United "privelidges" man, and was used in line with his footballing level (which had naturally dropped). What he did have, based on past performances, was respect from fans, team-mates, the staff and his manager.That's a fair point but status is only really based on past performances and the years he has spent with us and being involved in winning trophies. No one in their right mind should have expected a 30 year Rooney to match the past performances. Also if wage is a yardstick, hardly anyone is justifying their wages. For me earning 'only 150k' is not an excuse to play badly compared to someone who is earning '250k'. As I said earlier wages take into account a lot more than just the quality of the player. By all means criticize the performances but if we use wage as a stick then to me it somehow sounds like we are saying that as a player you will get less blame if someone earning more is playing gash.
If he avoids injury and being dropped, he's got at least 20 games to score the 9 goals he needs to break Charlton's record.
The Wayne Rooney of 4 or 5 years could probably do it comfortably, but i'm not sure this version, in this set-up, will. Be nice if he does though.
Hopefully he has a season like 2010/11, where he was poor in the first half, and excellent from New Years day onwards (when he got that stooping, headed goal against West Brom).