Escobar
Shameless Musketeer
He's useless in midfield. He just isnt good enough so either he plays upfront or not at all. LVG always speaks about balance but Rooney in midfield probably creates the most inbalance
I am one of his biggest fans but he was quite bad yesterday. If LVG thinks Falcao and RVP are better strikers then fair enough bring Rooney on as sub when they get tired or we need to try something different, however there is no point playing him in a role which is not No 10 or 9, specially when we have Blind, Fellaini, Hererra etc who are better suited there.
I think Rooney's performance is also getting affected because he has started realizing that his shift to midfield is probably not a temporary move in eyes of LVG. Not only is he competing with Falcao and RVP but also with Di Maria, Fellaini and Wilson (who have all been preferred up top in some recent games). The funny thing is that none of these players have shown any sort of goal-scoring form playing up front while Rooney was scoring quite a few when he was playing in No 9 or 10.
LVG was right to try him in midfield. But Rooney is not being effective there and our strike-force is not effective up front. Its just a no-brainer now that we drop one of RVP/Falcao (or even both) and try Rooney upfront with proper midfield players behind him.
I will join you if you allow me. We don't get penalties anymore , where are our divers ?
I don't see many runs into the penalty box where defenders could potentially make a mistake. I think 2 things needed for most penalties (apart from ref's proper view of incident):
fast runners into the penalty area at full throttle causing panic or through balls cutting across defense where defender have to foul the attacker to avoid 1-1 with GK. Too many crosses United is playing now for defenders to panic, it's easy to settle down and clear crosses.
In his United career it seems that the better Rooney's finishing, movement and awareness in the box has become, the further away from goal we've moved him.
That just isnt how I remember it at all. In 2011-12 he played up front and scored 34 goals, he was fantastic. When we signed a new striker and pushed him back the following summer some people spoke about SAF not having forgiven him for holding the club to ransom, like it was an act of vindictiveness. Others said, "when a player as good as RVP becomes available you just have to go for it." Either way, people werent talking about us needing a new striker because the one we had wasnt up to it.Actually I'd say the further away from playing as a striker that Rooney gets, the more fans overrate his ability as a striker. People forget that he isn't a great striker; thinking that he must be as he's a great player and he isn't a great midfielder/play-maker. People forget his patchy form and positional indiscipline up front caused most people to declare him a great number 10, but merely a good number 9 a few years ago.
Sadly too true.
That just isnt how I remember it at all. In 2011-12 he played up front and scored 34 goals, he was fantastic. When we signed a new striker and pushed him back the following summer some people spoke about SAF not having forgiven him for holding the club to ransom, like it was an act of vindictiveness. Others said, "when a player as good as RVP becomes available you just have to go for it." Either way, people werent talking about us needing a new striker because the one we had wasnt up to it.
Overall people remember the great periods of Rooney as a number 9 and forget the lengthy periods of inconsistency and mediocrity. They forget his positional indiscipline, forget his inability to play as a sole striker, forget his inconsistent first touch and remember maybe 50 games out of the 150 that he's played up front that he was in great form.
.
That's true for all strikers, not just Rooney. We watch Rooney every single game and at the same time presume every other top striker never goes through a barren spell. Rooney's barren spells are even tougher to judge the likeliood is not all of those games were spent playing as a striker. We have another striker at the club in RVP who goes through his share of barren spells.
He's only had 2 seasons where he's pretty much consistently played up top and he scored 30+ in both the seasons.
And 50 in 150 is a ridiculous figure, one you've pulled out of nowhere.
The reason he hasn't played more often as a number 9 is because he's often not been great there. I disagree that he's only had 2 seasons there, after Ruud left he played up front consistently until RVP was signed. The 06/07, 07/08, 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 & 11/12 seasons had Rooney playing up front far more often than not, 4 of these 6 seasons he didn't play great there which culminated in Hernandez playing himself into the position half way through the final season. During that period he played with Berbatov alongside him, Tevez alongside him, Ronaldo behind him, as well as briefly Saha and Hernandez ahead of him. Over this period you could point to 50-60 games where he showed consistency as a number 9: which was all of 09/10, a couple of months at the start of 11/12 and 3 months at the end of 11/12.
Hernandez form in 2010-2011 is a prime example of how playing brilliant will get you a place in the team, regardless. Unfortunately Rooney hasn't shown this level of form in 3 years. The only argument for starting Rooney up front is "everyone else is in poor form and Rooney was great 3 years ago".
Youre going back 7, 8, 9 years to assess his contribution as a striker. At that time, yes, he looked more like a second striker. But for me it is largely irrelevant considering his most recent spell up front dispelled any doubt about where he should be playing. His inability to play as a solo striker? He proved himself more than capable of playing that role then. Some people felt the rest of his game suffered when playing up there which is a separate argument, but in his primary task of scoring goals he excelled.Rooney has played up front for several lengthy periods and has had mixed results. He played a large chunk of the 06/07 and 07/08 seasons as a number 9 and didn't set the world alight. He also alternated the position with Berbatov for the 08/09 season and the start of the 10/11 season and went through lengthy periods of poor form (before Hernandez started playing). The 11/12 season he played up front often as well, on the whole he played very well but again he was inconsistent (if I recall he went through a couple of baron spells where he looked poor mid Sept - mid Dec and end Dec - end Jan). He basically started the season fantastically and finished fantastically which made the season seem brilliant on a whole. The 09/10 season he was great throughout.
Overall people remember the great periods of Rooney as a number 9 and forget the lengthy periods of inconsistency and mediocrity. They forget his positional indiscipline, forget his inability to play as a sole striker, forget his inconsistent first touch and remember maybe 50 games out of the 150 that he's played up front that he was in great form.
However I watch Rooney and I see a player who when on his game is a 10/10 player in central midfield, as a number 10 or as a number 9. His first touch is immaculate, his finishing phenomenal, long passing is fantastic, work rate/drive/determination are brilliant and short passing is very good. On the top of his game he is Shearer as a centre forward, Scholes in central midfielder and not a million miles away from Messi as a number 10.
The problem is he attains his absolute top level quite rarely and sustains a top level not nearly enough. For his ability Rooney plays a 5/10 infinitely more than 10/10.
The reason he hasn't played more often as a number 9 is because he's often not been great there. I disagree that he's only had 2 seasons there, after Ruud left he played up front consistently until RVP was signed. The 06/07, 07/08, 08/09, 09/10, 10/11 & 11/12 seasons had Rooney playing up front far more often than not, 4 of these 6 seasons he didn't play great there which culminated in Hernandez playing himself into the position half way through the final season. During that period he played with Berbatov alongside him, Tevez alongside him, Ronaldo behind him, as well as briefly Saha and Hernandez ahead of him. Over this period you could point to 50-60 games where he showed consistency as a number 9: which was all of 09/10, a couple of months at the start of 11/12 and 3 months at the end of 11/12.
Hernandez form in 2010-2011 is a prime example of how playing brilliant will get you a place in the team, regardless. Unfortunately Rooney hasn't shown this level of form in 3 years. The only argument for starting Rooney up front is "everyone else is in poor form and Rooney was great 3 years ago".
Disagree with this, after Ruud left Ronaldo, Tevez, Berbatov and even Saha were playing upfront while Rooney was often shunted to the left wing because Ronaldo was a liability playing on the wing. Yes he did play the odd game upfront in that period but he wasn't consistently played there for 30+ games, when he did he was pretty good.
Youre going back 7, 8, 9 years to assess his contribution as a striker. At that time, yes, he looked more like a second striker. But for me it is largely irrelevant considering his most recent spell up front dispelled any doubt about where he should be playing. His inability to play as a solo striker? He proved himself more than capable of playing that role then. Some people felt the rest of his game suffered when playing up there which is a separate argument, but in his primary task of scoring goals he excelled.
Maybe he had a bit of a lull in the middle of the season but I dont remember it being a huge one, his stats for the season were very good. As @akash02 said, that happens to every striker. I really dont think this is a case of rose-tinted hindsight, all things considered the facts point to his best position being up top.
The only thing he lacks as a number 9 is the ability play well with his back to goal. Which is where his indiscipline comes from. If the team is playing well he'll stay up top and not drop deep but the worse our performance is the deeper he comes. I prefer him as a #10 in an any case even if it means fewer goals.
It's pretty much a fact. He's only had 2 season of consistently playing there. At various points, you've had Saha, Larsson, Tevez, Berbatov, RVP all play in front of him. Then there was also the period where Fergie stuck Ronaldo up top and played Rooney out wide although this was mainly in the CL games. Not that he hasn't played there at all. He has but not had a long run of games there. So unless you can come up with some sort of stats of how many games he played as #9 and how many goals/assists he has in just those games, it's all a bit pointless.
Or you could aalso say, Rooney was great the last time he played there. He also started last season playing up top and scoring goals before moving deeper as the season went on.
He lacks many qualities to be a great number 9. He can't play with his back to goal, his first touch is too poor to play as a lone striker, his short passing often breaks down quick attacks and his positional indiscipline means that frequently he isn't in the box when you need him to be.
Again I don't agree that it's a fact he's only played 2 seasons as a number 9 and he wasn't great last time he played there, he was inconsistent. Which is exactly the problem with Rooney in any position he plays. I accept that almost every striker goes through dry patches, but with Rooney it wasn't just his failure to score during these (too frequent) periods, it was the fact that his level can drop to such a low that negatively effects the team far more when you're the focal point.
In my opinion a wide forward role would probably be the most forgiving for Rooney, given his inconsistencies but terrific work rate.
Again I don't agree that it's a fact he's only played 2 seasons as a number 9 and he wasn't great last time he played there, he was inconsistent
His first touch is quite good. Just because he has the odd stinker does not mean he has a poor first touch. Breaks down quick attacks? That's just complete nonsense. Some of the best counter attacks and fast paced goals we've scored have involved Rooney. His short passing is more than good enough when he plays as a #9 or #10 because it's mostly based on instinct. It's when he plays CM that it becomes suspect. Again, his positional indiscipline only comes to the fore when the team is playing shite and he feels the need to drop back.
You may not agree but it's the truth. Also, not the word consistent. He's only had 2 seasons of consistently playing there. That's irrefutable.
He's best as a #10 where he brings balance to the team while contributing plenty of goals and assists.
Im using one period, which is the most recent one available where he played in the position in question. That strikes me as being more rational than leapfrogging it entirely and looking at 2 or 3 seasons before that where he was played in a number of different positions and was still developing as a young player.And you're using a period 5 years ago to assess his ability as a centre forward, or looking very favourably on a season 3 years ago.
I could understand one manager having a blind spot to his qualities as a centre forward; but all three of our managers have dismissed the option of playing him up front. Fergie tried him there after Ruud left and with mixed results signed Hernandez and then RVP; Moyes tried him there but he ended up playing in other positions more often than not and now Van Gaal has tried him anywhere but the strikers position. Fans must accept there is something these people don't see in him that they do (or vice versa)?
Im using one period, which is the most recent one available where he played in the position in question. That strikes me as being more rational than leapfrogging it entirely and looking at 2 or 3 seasons before that where he was played in a number of different positions and was still developing as a young player.
However I will concede your second para does pose problems for me. In isolation each manager's treatment of Rooney can be explained easily enough but taken together, as you said, it does look like the managers see something the fans dont.
He used him out wide at the World Cup to play Sterling through the middle, I'm sure he'd do similar to get Kane and Sturridge in.Was thinking Engalnd game may be a good thing to get him back up top.
However with Kane and Sturridge (Who could make a good pair) - will Hodgson mix Rooney up in CM for England?
Evidently. God knows where they are getting that from.They see a squad that is profoundly flawed with a talented, versatile and extremely hard-working footballer able to help try and paper over the cracks?
Im using one period, which is the most recent one available where he played in the position in question. That strikes me as being more rational than leapfrogging it entirely and looking at 2 or 3 seasons before that where he was played in a number of different positions and was still developing as a young player.
However I will concede your second para does pose problems for me. In isolation each manager's treatment of Rooney can be explained easily enough but taken together, as you said, it does look like the managers see something the fans dont.
That's how I feel: versatile player who can help out if needed for a few games, but his default position should remain CF.He was right because at the time our CMs weren't fit and in form. Rooney can cover for a few matches and help out for sure.
I was looking at his career as a whole, but yes I agree he was good the last time he played as a number 9 consistently. However I also think he was one of the better player's last season as a number 10.
I think it's also pertinent that fans still argue where Rooney's best position is after watching him for 11 years. If there were a straightforward answer it would have been conclusively answered half a decade ago. A number of them say it's as a number 9, quite a lot say it's as a number 10 and then there's people like myself that think it's neither. Rooney is the only Footballer I can think of that doesn't actually have a position.
Rooney is a bizarre hybrid of several types of player's, which actually makes him good but not great in almost any position. If you could swap a couple of his qualities with a couple of his weaknesses you could have the perfect number 8, number 10, number 9 or wide forward. Bizarrely however he has a (or a couple of) key weaknesses for each of these positions, whilst possessing an array of strengths which aren't natural to a player of these specific positions.
Agreed, right now he should definitely be playing up front just to get us a bit of momentum if nothing else, but I think those stats highlight the fact that, if RVP and Fatcao were scoring from the chances we create, it wouldn't be a problem that he's playing in CM.I know stats aren't everything, but on paper that shows what a bloody good go he is giving it. Taking the captain's duty seriously and rolling his sleeves up. Good to see.
He should be playing up front though, at least we should be trying him there whilst we are in this slump.