Warn fellow caftards about really shit films

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
17,993
Location
Flagg
Good public service this. It means only one of us has to waste our time watching them.

To be clear though, we're going for films that are genuinely, and indesputably shite. Not films that were just slightly disappointing, or cheesy action flicks, that no matter how stupid, pointless, stereotypically racist, and repetitive, still manage to be slightly entertaining. I mean films that leave you literally feeling angry at having watched them.



Examples:

Fast and Furious - Was dragged along to watch this, thinking it'd be your average cheesy popcorn flick. Instead, seemingly the only real purpose of this film was to allow Vin Deasel (aka Riddic) to further confirm himself on the increasingly long list of male actors, who jump from one movie to the next, playing the exact same character in each one, merely changing their clothes to suit (the exception here being Keanu Reeves, who doesn't even bother to change his clothes. Ever). Plot holes that even the new Transformers movie would struggle to contend with, pathetic acting, failed attempts at Matrix style coolness. About as dramatic as ordering a pizza on the internet, much less so if you happen to lose your connection half way through, or can't decide on a topping.

Solaris - I simply didn't get this film, though it'd take some convincing for me to believe there was actually anything to get. Man goes on spaceship, has imaginary sex with dead wife, dies. That's it, except it drags the whole thing out for nearly two hours. It could have been about two minutes long and still dragged. Literally nothing else happens. I rented it from Blocbusters, on the grounds that there was a guy in a space suit on the cover, and therefore it'd either be good, or about aliens. How wrong I was. Avoid

Casino Royal - didn't understand what was trying to be accomplished here. Bond films are supposed to be light hearted action flicks. If they wanted to take a new direction, that's ok I guess, except, what the feck was this? It wasn't an action film, that's for sure, can't exactly call it a thriller, and except for one part where a guy suddenly and inexplicably gets electricuted and dragged off by two other blokes, it certainly wasn't funny. My theory is that the film originally had a plot/sequence, but they kept cutting bits out, until all that was left was the customary game of poker, which they nicked from one of the several other Bond films it also takes place in. So in the end, they just made that one game of poker last the entire film, and hoped no one would notice.

Now, watch someone go and dispute all three of those.
 
Four Rooms - This film seemed interesting due to the rather unique concept of 4 seperate mini-films rolled into one, directed by a differing director. Everything Tarantino touched up until this was gold, and I greatly admire Tim Roth as an actor. However, the film went absolutely nowhere, Roth's overracting, although comical, contributed to this culmination of complete nothingness. Good for a few giggles, but no real plotline, and I believe that the final mini-film's (the one directed by Tarantino) plotline was directly lifted from some TV show a couple of decades back. A pile of steaming turd, which is a shame as I really like Tim Roth as an actor.
 
Knowing - Nicholas Cage. Man finds numbers that predict the future, gawps at a plane crash and a tube accident that were predicted, then realises that the final prediction is that we're all doomed anyway, thus rendering the prediction part utterly pointless as there's no way of saving anyone. Right at the end what seemed like a meaningless and totally unrelated sub-plot for two hours of the film becomes the main story and Cage and his numbers aren't mentioned again as angels kidnap children and fly them in spaceships to the Garden of Eden where they stroke white rabbits and run towards silver trees.
 
Good public service this. It means only one of us has to waste our time watching them.

To be clear though, we're going for films that are genuinely, and indesputably shite. Not films that were just slightly disappointing, or cheesy action flicks, that no matter how stupid, pointless, stereotypically racist, and repetitive, still manage to be slightly entertaining. I mean films that leave you literally feeling angry at having watched them.



Examples:

Fast and Furious - Was dragged along to watch this, thinking it'd be your average cheesy popcorn flick. Instead, seemingly the only real purpose of this film was to allow Vin Deasel (aka Riddic) to further confirm himself on the increasingly long list of male actors, who jump from one movie to the next, playing the exact same character in each one, merely changing their clothes to suit (the exception here being Keanu Reeves, who doesn't even bother to change his clothes. Ever). Plot holes that even the new Transformers movie would struggle to contend with, pathetic acting, failed attempts at Matrix style coolness. About as dramatic as ordering a pizza on the internet, much less so if you happen to lose your connection half way through, or can't decide on a topping.

Solaris - I simply didn't get this film, though it'd take some convincing for me to believe there was actually anything to get. Man goes on spaceship, has imaginary sex with dead wife, dies. That's it, except it drags the whole thing out for nearly two hours. It could have been about two minutes long and still dragged. Literally nothing else happens. I rented it from Blocbusters, on the grounds that there was a guy in a space suit on the cover, and therefore it'd either be good, or about aliens. How wrong I was. Avoid

Casino Royal - didn't understand what was trying to be accomplished here. Bond films are supposed to be light hearted action flicks. If they wanted to take a new direction, that's ok I guess, except, what the feck was this? It wasn't an action film, that's for sure, can't exactly call it a thriller, and except for one part where a guy suddenly and inexplicably gets electricuted and dragged off by two other blokes, it certainly wasn't funny. My theory is that the film originally had a plot/sequence, but they kept cutting bits out, until all that was left was the customary game of poker, which they nicked from one of the several other Bond films it also takes place in. So in the end, they just made that one game of poker last the entire film, and hoped no one would notice.

Now, watch someone go and dispute all three of those
.

Ok then, I will.

Casino Royal is the best Bond film I've ever seen.

Ian Fleming's Bond was a secret agent in the traditional style - suave, sophisticated and a hard as feck bastard to boot.

This film combined these elements and produced a Bond film that moved away from the quasi-camp mode the franchise had found itself in, and produced film that was worthy of Fleming's original vision.

Quantum of Solace is proper bunk though.
 
Knowing - Nicholas Cage. Man finds numbers that predict the future, gawps at a plane crash and a tube accident that were predicted, then realises that the final prediction is that we're all doomed anyway, thus rendering the prediction part utterly pointless as there's no way of saving anyone. Right at the end what seemed like a meaningless and totally unrelated sub-plot for two hours of the film becomes the main story and Cage and his numbers aren't mentioned again as angels kidnap children and fly them in spaceships to the Garden of Eden where they stroke white rabbits and run towards silver trees.

The adverts made it look like Numberwang! so I went to see it. Utter toss, a really laughable film.
 
Streets of Blood - I'd imagine the bloke who made this had aspirations for it to be Godfather-esque...It's not, it's utter toss. Filmed incredibly annoyingly by a cretin, acted stunningly badly (when 50 cents the best thing in it, you know your in trouble) morally confused (very morally confused) and just dull...very very dull. And confusing. It has shit music too, which it overplays and it's far too long

Avoid!
 
Knowing - Nicholas Cage. Man finds numbers that predict the future, gawps at a plane crash and a tube accident that were predicted, then realises that the final prediction is that we're all doomed anyway, thus rendering the prediction part utterly pointless as there's no way of saving anyone. Right at the end what seemed like a meaningless and totally unrelated sub-plot for two hours of the film becomes the main story and Cage and his numbers aren't mentioned again as angels kidnap children and fly them in spaceships to the Garden of Eden where they stroke white rabbits and run towards silver trees.

I actually thought it started pretty ok, especially for a Cage film, but it deteriorated epically and snowballed into one of the worst films i've seen.
 
Ok then, I will.

Casino Royal is the best Bond film I've ever seen.

Ian Fleming's Bond was a secret agent in the traditional style - suave, sophisticated and a hard as feck bastard to boot.

This film combined these elements and produced a Bond film that moved away from the quasi-camp mode the franchise had found itself in, and produced film that was worthy of Fleming's original vision.

Quantum of Solace is proper bunk though.

This.
 
Ok then, I will.

Casino Royal is the best Bond film I've ever seen.

Ian Fleming's Bond was a secret agent in the traditional style - suave, sophisticated and a hard as feck bastard to boot.

This film combined these elements and produced a Bond film that moved away from the quasi-camp mode the franchise had found itself in, and produced film that was worthy of Fleming's original vision.

Quantum of Solace is proper bunk though.

How do you know?

He spent the entire fecking film playing cards
 
Casino Royal - didn't understand what was trying to be accomplished here. Bond films are supposed to be light hearted action flicks. If they wanted to take a new direction, that's ok I guess, except, what the feck was this? It wasn't an action film, that's for sure, can't exactly call it a thriller, and except for one part where a guy suddenly and inexplicably gets electricuted and dragged off by two other blokes, it certainly wasn't funny. My theory is that the film originally had a plot/sequence, but they kept cutting bits out, until all that was left was the customary game of poker, which they nicked from one of the several other Bond films it also takes place in. So in the end, they just made that one game of poker last the entire film, and hoped no one would notice.

Now, watch someone go and dispute all three of those.

This may be the only thing we ever agree on. Ever.
 
Okay, everybody just chill the feck out....im about to feck you with the truth


Nicolas cage is awesome....reason.....Con Air baby!
 
Solyaris is a good film, watch it.

Don't watch it if you can't get your head around why Adam Sandler haven't gotten an Oscar yet.

----

Don't watch Bring it On Again, sucks.
 
The Rock was very good I thought, and that had Cage, he has a few decent films but for the most part they are absolutely awful
 
Casino Royal was excellent and very true to the original character. Quantum of Solace was an incoherent mess.

The Age of Sexual Innocence was the worst film ever made. Ever. I dare you to try to watch it and get more than half way through until you start fast forwarding to see if anything understandable ever happens.

Spoiler: IT DOESN'T.

Only a head up arse film student could find any redeeming quality in this film and even then its redeeming quality will be showing off to other film students who also have their heads up their arses.
 
Casino Royal was excellent and very true to the original character. Quantum of Solace was an incoherent mess.

The Age of Sexual Innocence was the worst film ever made. Ever. I dare you to try to watch it and get more than half way through until you start fast forwarding to see if anything understandable ever happens.

Spoiler: IT DOESN'T.

Only a head up arse film student could find any redeeming quality in this film and even then its redeeming quality will be showing off to other film students who also have their heads up their arses.

I actually hated Casino Royale the first time I saw, but the second time, I was more than impressed with it. I actually thought Quantum of Solace was quite good, despite many on here not liking it. I think one of the great things about QOS is that it sets up the next 007 film to go after the whole organization that is Quantum, which I think could be really great. QOS was a bit lacking in plot, well of course it had one, it just was overly simple, but the action and pace of the film was absolutely excellent.
 
Leaving Las Vegas is good, too. The **** even managed an Oscar for it!

Edit: Why can't I say "cunt" anymore?

Bloody hell did he get an oscar for that? that was one of the worst films I ever saw with a serious case for 'overacting/oscar seeking'- not seen since Hoffman in Rainman.
 
Bloody hell did he get an oscar for that? that was one of the worst films I ever saw with a serious case for 'overacting/oscar seeking'- not seen since Hoffman in Rainman.

Have to agree with you there, overdone it i felt, John Malkovic was better as Lenny in Of Mice and Men
 
I actually hated Casino Royale the first time I saw, but the second time, I was more than impressed with it. I actually thought Quantum of Solace was quite good, despite many on here not liking it. I think one of the great things about QOS is that it sets up the next 007 film to go after the whole organization that is Quantum, which I think could be really great. QOS was a bit lacking in plot, well of course it had one, it just was overly simple, but the action and pace of the film was absolutely excellent.

I never actually really got QOS, in the end it seemed to be about water, which was stupid.

Started off well but got progressively worse as the film went on.
 
Meet Joe Black

oh dear jesus. takes boredom to a new level

Hello
Hello
Who are you
Me?
Yes you
I'm Joe
Joe?
Yes Joe
Joe Who?
I'm Joe Black
Joe Black?
Yes Joe Black
 
I never actually really got QOS, in the end it seemed to be about water, which was stupid.

Started off well but got progressively worse as the film went on.

I think it had more to do with the scope and power that is Quantum and also the compliance of governments in their plans. But when they went to South America I surely thought they wouldnt be there for the rest of the film, in that respect they could have done better.
 
I never actually really got QOS, in the end it seemed to be about water, which was stupid.

Started off well but got progressively worse as the film went on.

I thought the idea was good but they'd clearly had to cut massive bits of plot out in order to fit in boring action sequences so it ended up making little sense and none of the characters were fleshed out at all. There was a run of about 30 minutes near the beginning of the film where it was just "long action scene, two lines explaining why we need a new action scene, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat." I actually almost fell asleep. Oh and I forgot to mention that line where someone goes "Fuel cells, eh. Sounds dangerous." And then about 20 minutes later in the biggest shock of the day the place blew the feck up.

Summary: Quantum of Solace could have been great but was actually pretty shit. Nothing film trying to link Casino Royale to the next Bond film that will come out.
 
Vantage Point

terrible shite

Dennis Quaid is another one of the Nic Cage types, total shit actor who ruins a lot of films. Tries to act exactly like Harrison Ford which I find amusing.