Victor Lindelof image 2

Victor Lindelof Sweden flag

2017-18 Performances


View full 2017-18 profile

5.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
29
Clean sheets
13
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thought he looked good tonight, looks way more confident and assured now after a shaky start. Looks more like the guy I saw at Benfica.
 
He had decent moments tonight but also some sloppy ones. He's certainly a work in progress.
 
Tuanzebe had been impressive but clearly Lindelof is different profile that aims to improve our ability to initiate attack from the back. Tuanzebe can pass and can dribbling out of tight situation, but as far as I know, for him to fill that profile may take forever, even impossible. Sometimes it's about special talent and in this case, Lindelof has it. However, we definitely would like him to adapt quicker.

I don't think that Lindelof is special. He obiously is a talent, no doubt, but I don't think he's that special. My opinion is that Tuanzebe is a bigger talnt than Lindelof. I think that Chelsea is a pretty good example, they let go of players like Lukaku, De Bruyne, Salah and so on. Instead they bought mediocre talent like Schurrle. Who knows, maybe Lindelof is a special talent and Tuanzebe isn't. But from what I've seen, it seems like a pretty pointless signing. Remember that we have TFM aswell.
 
I don't think that Lindelof is special. He obiously is a talent, no doubt, but I don't think he's that special. My opinion is that Tuanzebe is a bigger talnt than Lindelof. I think that Chelsea is a pretty good example, they let go of players like Lukaku, De Bruyne, Salah and so on. Instead they bought mediocre talent like Schurrle. Who knows, maybe Lindelof is a special talent and Tuanzebe isn't. But from what I've seen, it seems like a pretty pointless signing. Remember that we have TFM aswell.

And I think he also cost a fair bit more than the buyback on Michael Keane. Does indeed seem a bit odd to gamble on Lindelof with more money when you can get a ready made, better defender for less cash.
 
I haven't really seen anything from Tuanzebe in his appearances for the first team that suggests that he'll become a top class defender in the future. It seems like he gets more highly rated the less he plays.

And I think he also cost a fair bit more than the buyback on Michael Keane. Does indeed seem a bit odd to gamble on Lindelof with more money when you can get a ready made, better defender for less cash.
How's Michael Keane doing at Everton again?
 
I haven't really seen anything from Tuanzebe in his appearances for the first team that suggests that he'll become a top class defender in the future. It seems like he gets more highly rated the less he plays.


How's Michael Keane doing at Everton again?

And what have you seen from Lindelof? When Lindelof was 20 he played in the portugese second division.
 
And what have you seen from Lindelof? When Lindelof was 20 he played in the portugese second division.

When Ibrahimović was 19-20, he played in the even worse Swedish second division. And then went to Ajax, where he flopped initially.
 
I'm not doubting that Tuanzebe can become a good defender in the future, it's just that his reputation on the caf seems to be based a lot on wishful thinking.
 
I agree. He's supposedly have had slow starts in all clubs he's been new in. I wouldn't be surprised if he mimics Carrick on the pitch as well and gets moved up the pitch in the future, as a kind of a modern defender/DMF/regista hybrid, when he gets settled in and good enough. His feet are way too good for being wasted on a static CB role, and José has always valued good defensive players with very good feet. He's also hinted at Lindelöf's potential in multiple roles in interviews. I'm pretty sure this lad has a career in this club, I'm just not sure in what position yet.

Mourinho bought him to play 3 at the back like Bonucci with Juventus but we don't have the wing-backs...

I think that next season, the 352 will be our main formation.
 
Last edited:
I'm not doubting that Tuanzebe can become a good defender in the future, it's just that his reputation on the caf seems to be based a lot on wishful thinking.

His performance against Sanchez was more inpressive than anything Lindelöf has served up so far, for United at least
 
His performance against Sanchez was more inpressive than anything Lindelöf has served up so far, for United at least
While Tuanzebe's performance vs Sanchez was top notch. It was as RB. Also it's just one situation we know (man marking). As CB and utilize different defensive tactic, many stuff may arises something we can see young Tuanzebe had error that he needs to iron out at Reserve level. We're not talking about ceiling here.

Lindelof after shaky start seems like finding his feet and gradually improves, while his ability to create chance from the back is quite impressive.
 
And I think he also cost a fair bit more than the buyback on Michael Keane. Does indeed seem a bit odd to gamble on Lindelof with more money when you can get a ready made, better defender for less cash.

All Keane has proven is that he can play in a Burnley team that defended deep. We should sign Tarkowski as well.
 
And I think he also cost a fair bit more than the buyback on Michael Keane. Does indeed seem a bit odd to gamble on Lindelof with more money when you can get a ready made, better defender for less cash.

All Michael Keane has shown is hes a mid table defender and not good enough to play for us. Lindelof is yet to prove himself either way, but I'd rather that than buy someone we already know isn't up to it.
 
After the initial handbags, he seems to be settled a little and has shown us what he can do, and I beleive he is only going to improve. And he seems to be the only defender we have who won't hoof the ball at the first sign of trouble, and play a pass midfield under pressure. I didn't watch last match, but the recent reactions seem very much of a knee jerk.
 
Liability when he plays in a 4 at the back, looks good when we play 3/5 at the back. Terrible 1 on 1 with a forward and poor at tracking runs (see bristol winner). Great on the ball though, more of a CDM than a centre back tbh. Currently our 5th best centre back after Bailly, Rojo, Smalling and Jones.
 
Liability when he plays in a 4 at the back, looks good when we play 3/5 at the back. Terrible 1 on 1 with a forward and poor at tracking runs (see bristol winner). Great on the ball though, more of a CDM than a centre back tbh. Currently our 5th best centre back after Bailly, Rojo, Smalling and Jones.
Huh? Rojo is looking right at that runner and watches him go whilst Lindelof is facing up the man who plays the pass. Rojo can have decent performances but his poor permonces outweigh his good ones.
 
All Keane has proven is that he can play in a Burnley team that defended deep. We should sign Tarkowski as well.

Not saying we should've signed Keane (wouldn't have signed him or Lindelof, would've promoted Tuanzebe), just that he's currently shown a higher level in the Prem than Lindelof, and was cheaper. Both facts.
 
Liability when he plays in a 4 at the back, looks good when we play 3/5 at the back. Terrible 1 on 1 with a forward and poor at tracking runs (see bristol winner). Great on the ball though, more of a CDM than a centre back tbh. Currently our 5th best centre back after Bailly, Rojo, Smalling and Jones.

Tuanzebe is better aswell.
 
I would rate Bailly as no 1 and Lindelof & Jones as second depending on what qualities you need and what formation. Smalling no 4 and Rojo as 5. Both are too reckless and have too poor judgement for my taste. Haven’t seen so much of Tuanzebe but what I have seen he looks ok.

When they go for 3 at the back, which he seems to do more often when Pogba plays, I think Lindelöf’s qualities are better utilised and his weaknesses play smaller role.

Also, choosing CB is not about one man, it is about finding a good combo where both (or all three) get the opportunity to play many matches together. To do that, they must stay fit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not saying we should've signed Keane (wouldn't have signed him or Lindelof, would've promoted Tuanzebe), just that he's currently shown a higher level in the Prem than Lindelof, and was cheaper. Both facts.

He cant even get a game for Everton at the moment. Lindelof and Sweden also kept out Italy playing very deep. Same thing Burnley do. Keane has proven nothing in a team that plays open football.
 
I'm surprised that Mourinho have played Rojo in all these games instead of Lindelöf. Lindelöf was good against Bristol City, couldn't have prevented any of the goals the way I see it.
 
Must have been a stellar performance in order to convince so many caf posters that he's a better option than Lindelöf at CB

Just see the debate above. Both him and Lindelof played that game in the back 3, Tuanzebe was slightly better imo, but than again Lindelof was just settling in and from than on raised his performance.

Don't know about being a better option as the sample is just too small to judge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.