Isotope
Ten Years a Cafite
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2012
- Messages
- 24,219
How much per week Vardy is on?
How much per week Vardy is on?
Vardy, the PL winner who consistently turns up (and scores) against the best teams in the PL...?
He's on less than Rashford.
Would gladly take him on a couple years contract. He scores goals and rarely gets injured.Vardy, the PL winner who consistently turns up (and scores) against the best teams in the PL...?
He's on less than Rashford.
Hilarious! Truly, truly, truly hilarious!!!!I'd take Vardy at United along with their 3 midfielders and maybe Perez. Put with our defence and Rashford and Martial and also maybe nab Rodgers as coach and I reckon we'd be up there.
Another player who needs open space to run into and wouldn't fix our issues.
How much per week Vardy is on?
How much was the question?Much less than Rashford.
How much was the question?
To do what? Continue to disappoint and flop and get boo’d by their childish and arrogant fanbase, as opposed to stay somewhere where he is a cult figure and the playing style is built to suit him.Really should have moved to Arsenal all those years ago.
Thanks!140K according to Spotrac.
Vardy, the PL winner who consistently turns up (and scores) against the best teams in the PL...?
He's on less than Rashford.
Shows what an idiot Vardy was to sign that contract.Vardy, the PL winner who consistently turns up (and scores) against the best teams in the PL...?
He's on less than Rashford.
Something like north of 140k a week as far as I know.How much was the question?
Shows what an idiot Vardy was to sign that contract.
Just made a point in the Brendan Rodgers thread that Vardy had 24 touches and 12 passes yesterday, but scored three goals. Statistically, this season he averaged 12.4 passes a game, which shows that he's a striker that doesn't get involved in the build up play much. Actually, before he scored yesterday, some people in the gameweek thread were saying he wasn't very involved.
Ultimately, a striker is there to score, and Vardy certainly does that, but if you haven't got the creativity behind you, what can you do?
Brendan Rodgers has two creative 8' behind him, in Maddison and Tielemans, and two wingers and full backs who stretch play and create from wide areas.
As I said, Vardy is a fantastic goalscorer, but I honestly believe if he were here, we wouldn't be seeing anywhere near the amount of goals he's scored because we simply don't create enough. I'm sure Leicester had the same problem when Claude Puel was there.
Well obviously.
As Rashford is a better player.
What a pathetic response as well.
Yes we did and the game changer was Tielemans. The latter was convinced by Puel to come here, thanks to his Monaco connection, as he fell out with Jardim and his career came to a stall. Puel couldn't reap the benefits of this signing as he was sacked a couple of weeks later.
This isn't to say that Rodgers didn't get the most out of him though.
Hes the player Rashford should most look to emulate stylistically rather than the failed attempts to be Ronaldo
Vardy is obviously a better player than Rashford.
Hes the player Rashford should most look to emulate stylistically rather than the failed attempts to be Ronaldo
Vardy is obviously a better player than Rashford.
He's a better striker, that's for sure.Vardy is obviously a better player than Rashford.
how how much of an idiot the person that does the contracts at United is to put Rashford on a bigger contract than Vardy when he hasn't earned itShows what an idiot Vardy was to sign that contract.
his all around game is better nowBack to his 15/16 best.