UnitedSofa
You'll Never Walk Away
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
- Messages
- 7,306
What is he on about? If there is less time-wasting, the games won’t be any longer. It’s really not a difficult concept. Players will now just be playing matches that are the correct length, not artificially shortened by whichever team happens to be winning.
Have they even give a reason behind the idea of longer games? I just don't understand it.
There will be almost ten minutes of stoppage time whether teams are time-wasting or not. It’s a load of bollocks, where time-wasting teams aren’t actually punished at all.
There wasn’t any time wasting yesterday and we got 12 minutes of extra timeOnly if there have been actual injuries or other stoppages which justify it. He obviously has a good point about the schedule generally but match length is the wrong focus.
There wasn’t any time wasting yesterday and we got 12 minutes of extra time
They are asking players not to talk back to refs. Which is something I just don't understand and I've had previous debates about it. In any profession, if you mess up you would expect your colleagues to let you know. But a ref can make all kind of terrible decisions and players are just supposed to smile and nod. Especially, given the standard of refereeing which is atrocious at best."Less emotions being shown by players"?
Nobody is asking for that. Just don't be a cheating, time wasting, petulent bellend (Varane doesn't seem to be either or those things) and there's no problem.
Spot on.They need to enforce yellow cards for time wasting more seriously.. Especially the obvious things..
not getting off the pitch quick / not talking the shortest exit
kicking/throwing ball away
stopping a quick throw in/free kick
and any place where the ref thinks there is a clear attempt to waste time.
They are asking players not to talk back to refs. Which is something I just don't understand and I've had previous debates about it. In any profession, if you mess up you would expect your colleagues to let you know. But a ref can make all kind of terrible decisions and players are just supposed to smile and nod. Especially, given the standard of refereeing which is atrocious at best.
That’s after 8 minutes was signalled though?It was about right to be fair. There was a very long stoppage for a head injury.
On the flip side theres also the problem small face when they’re falsely accused of time wasting. I see it at Anfield all the time, it’s when they aren’t rushing around after the ball or simply not running off the pitch when subbed they’re accused of time wasting and Liverpool get 5/6/7 minutes to find a goal out of nowhere.They need to enforce yellow cards for time wasting more seriously.. Especially the obvious things..
not getting off the pitch quick / not talking the shortest exit
kicking/throwing ball away
stopping a quick throw in/free kick
and any place where the ref thinks there is a clear attempt to waste time.
He’s right. The new additional time rule is a load of old bollocks and will get canned after three weeks.
It‘s also another huge piss in the face of match-going supporters, who already have to leave the ground early in order to make sure they get home before 6am the next morning.
The game is fine as it is; just leave it alone.
How am I supposed to politely tell a ref he's rubbish at his job?There's not asking players to "not talk back". They're asking them to not be abusive.
How am I supposed to politely tell a ref he's rubbish at his job?
Making instead of trying to cover up the issue, FA should invest more resources into ensuring the refs are of a higher standard.
They have specifically asked for that though, including reducing time spent celebrating etc"Less emotions being shown by players"?
Nobody is asking for that. Just don't be a cheating, time wasting, petulant bellend (Varane doesn't seem to be either or those things) and there's no problem.
Pretty sure that's how most players interact with the refs. Most of the interactions you see involve a chuckle from either party."you got that one wrong ref, I got the ball"
Is very different to multiple players chasing the ref screaming swearwords in his face.
They have specifically asked for that though, including reducing time spent celebrating etc
Pretty sure that's how most players interact with the refs. Most of the interactions you see involve a chuckle from either party.
It's only when during the same game refs keep making the wrong decisions or make a wrong decision in a high pressure situation do players react aggressively. Even in those cases unless someone goes ballistic like Mitrovic and puts his hands on the ref, I don't see the reason to make a big hue and cry about it.
Wrong decisions affect matches and title challenges, so I don't find it strange players who are giving everything on the pitch will react with angst over wrong decisions.
He’s right. The new additional time rule is a load of old bollocks and will get canned after three weeks.
What is he on about? If there is less time-wasting, the games won’t be any longer. It’s really not a difficult concept. Players will now just be playing matches that are the correct length, not artificially shortened by whichever team happens to be winning.
I don't know why additional time makes more sense than a stop clock.
Not in those exact words, but if they’ve been asked to reduce time celebrating, and tone down interactions with the referee, then I can easily understand why someone may refer to that as ‘showing less emotion’. Particularly if it’s not a native speaker.You think they've "specifically asked" for players to show less emotions?