pocco
loco
Christ, I hope they don't find their way onto here Some home truths can be found on here for a lot of people associated with the club these days.
All three of those are essentially automatic picks so they aren't "peripheral" players are they? So it's a waste of energy speculating on any of those three other than just to enjoy throwing shit at them.Well, they are the only players who have gotten heavy critique in the media(I reckon you could throw AWB in there as well), so who else could it be?
Luckhurst wrote another good article about this sort of thing during the summer that went under the radar.
In it, he heavily infers that all the players he's talking about are British and also notes that it isn't Shaw (who has 'never once complained')
We have an absurdly thin-skinned group of (British) players.
All three of those are essentially automatic picks so they aren't "peripheral" players are they? So it's a waste of energy speculating on any of those three other than just to enjoy throwing shit at them.
This the what the article says:
The father of a player informed me my coverage of their son had been ‘red flagged’ by the player’s social media team. The player is still contracted to United but so peripheral it seemed inconceivable he could have a ‘team’.
Already this season, the relative of another prominent United player has sent me an abusive email. A follow-up arrived in my inbox an hour later from the same address, claiming they had been ‘hacked’. It was a rash transgression. The aforementioned players are all still at United.
So in relation to the very peripheral figure, you're looking at the back-up goalkeepers, Jones, Amad, Mata, Martial.
Regarding the prominent player, I would wager that is more likely to be AWB than Maguire or Shaw. I say this because the media have always claimed Shaw has never complained & Maguire has had a lot more shit thrown at him in the past than he's getting at the moment, additionally he has publically stated he doesn't look at social media so there is no reason he would be contacting a journalist. Plus, the article goes on to hammer Wan Bissaka for being poor with the press & very quiet.
It is also important to note a players family contacting a journalist does not mean the player has had anything to do with it. Frankly the backdown an hour or so later could easily have been when the player found out about it and told them to backtrack.
Maguire 100%, his family seem a tad touchy on social media when it comes to criticism of him and the fact on the article, he's on everyone photo basically as a subtle, yet massive hint.Samuel Luckhurst of the Manchester Evening News claims that some family members of Manchester United players have been in touch with him to complain about negative coverage of the players in question.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....ed-players-complain-about-media-coverage/amp/
Not at all surprising.. mentally weak team can’t handle criticism shocker. Maguire and Bruno are two players who’ve come out whinging over criticism over the past year. That’s our captain and best player… which speaks volumes.
Wondering who these players are who’s family members are crying to the press….
Numerous players constantly apologising through that media relations wanker after every embarrassing defeat.
Do our players have no shame ? At all? Seriously ?
For some reason I read that United players upset at criticism and dimsums
Maguire 100%, his family seem a tad touchy on social media when it comes to criticism of him and the fact on the article, he's on everyone photo basically as a subtle, yet massive hint.
The other is mentioned as more or less, part of the squad but is nowhere near playing.
Aahahaha, well doesn't that sound familiar?!Luckhurst: The most player-specific correspondence I get is from Swedish or Scandinavian readers appalled by my assessments of Victor Lindelof, yet Lindelof would not recognise me if I doorstepped him.
McTominay blocked Goldbridge last week. Can't blame him for that though."The player who did the blocking on Twitter used to search his name on the site to read negative posts to channel them into positive performances. He never seemed likely to make it at United but he has."
Gotta be McTominay or Fred? Can't think of any other players who fits that bill.
Aahahaha, well doesn't that sound familiar?!
We're all familiar with them too, Samuel.
So every word Luckhurst says is true? Did he provide any evidence in his article?
Hercule Poirot on the case.
Luckhurst is an idiot and has always comes across as a moany twat, so it's a bit rich. Just because his attitude captures the zeitgeist now doesn't mean we should believe everything hands down.
I don’t think they’re thin skinned, there’s more entitlement amongst fans now who think they can give them shit on social media and in real life, because they see others doing it on social media.Luckhurst wrote another good article about this sort of thing during the summer that went under the radar.
In it, he heavily infers that all the players he's talking about are British and also notes that it isn't Shaw (who has 'never once complained')
We have an absurdly thin-skinned group of (British) players.
Hmm you might be right, but I just remember being wholy unprofessional when tweeting, for a journalist and basically acting like a gobby fan. So it wouldn't surprise me if you're right.Didn't he make some racist tweets/ Remember there was thread on caf with lot of tweets in that thread. Someone posted his old tweets.
Didn't McTominay block that guy from the United Stand recently? (probably understandable with how much of a prat the guy is).
First thought was Rashford but you never know.
Indeed. I wouldn't be surprised if none of it is true, or if it's heavily fabricated. The bloke is a clown.Luckhurst is an idiot and has always comes across as a moany twat, so it's a bit rich. Just because his attitude captures the zeitgeist now doesn't mean we should believe everything hands down.
Yeah this is my issue with how he writes stuff. It reads like a shitty daily mail article about Meghan Markle or something.Indeed. I wouldn't be surprised if none of it is true, or if it's heavily fabricated. The bloke is a clown.
"The father of a player informed me my coverage of their son had been ‘red flagged’ by the player’s social media team. The player is still contracted to United but so peripheral it seemed inconceivable he could have a ‘team’. "
Lines like this in the article just seem very weird and bitter. Why would it be inconceivable to him that a Utd player had a social media team despite them being "peripheral" these days? Makes absolutely no sense. I'm pretty sure players don't hire and fire their social media teams based on how often they get a game.
Luckhurst wrote another good article about this sort of thing during the summer that went under the radar.
In it, he heavily infers that all the players he's talking about are British and also notes that it isn't Shaw (who has 'never once complained')
We have an absurdly thin-skinned group of (British) players.
Yeah my money is on Maguire being the main guy. Guessing Lingard for the other…Maguire 100%, his family seem a tad touchy on social media when it comes to criticism of him and the fact on the article, he's on everyone photo basically as a subtle, yet massive hint.
The other is mentioned as more or less, part of the squad but is nowhere near playing.